'Index on Censorship' and Wikileaks
Index on Censorship | 09.02.2011 14:52 | Repression
Index on Censorship is troubled by the uncomfortably close relationship between one of Wikileak's paid correspondents and the dictatorial regime of Belarus, where the cables are likely to be used to persecute political opponents of President-for-Life Lukashenko, who recently "won" a discredited reelection bid by the simple strategy of imprisoning all opposition candidates.
It has been reported that an “accredited” journalist for Wikileaks, Israel Shamir, met with Uladzimri Makei, the Head of the Presidential administration in Belarus. Subsequently, it was reported in the Belarus Telegraf that a state newspaper would be publishing documents about the Belarusian opposition.
Wikileaks has always maintained it takes care to ensure that names of political activists are redacted from cables before publication on its website. Index on Censorship is concerned that some of the Wikileaks cables relating to Belarus that have not appeared on the main Wikileaks website are now in the public domain.
There are various “commercial crimes” in Belarus that make it a criminal offence to run an unregistered organisation. In turn, many NGOs are prohibited from registering their organisations. This places a lot of civil society in Belarus in a legal grey area which can mean political activists, who cannot register, are placed in breach of the law for accepting foreign funding. It is rumoured in Belarus that many of the Wikileaks cables outline foreign support for opposition groups. Our worry is that this information could be used to prosecute some of the political prisoners currently held by the KGB.
http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/02/wikileaks-belarus-and-israel-shamir/
Wikileaks has always maintained it takes care to ensure that names of political activists are redacted from cables before publication on its website. Index on Censorship is concerned that some of the Wikileaks cables relating to Belarus that have not appeared on the main Wikileaks website are now in the public domain.
There are various “commercial crimes” in Belarus that make it a criminal offence to run an unregistered organisation. In turn, many NGOs are prohibited from registering their organisations. This places a lot of civil society in Belarus in a legal grey area which can mean political activists, who cannot register, are placed in breach of the law for accepting foreign funding. It is rumoured in Belarus that many of the Wikileaks cables outline foreign support for opposition groups. Our worry is that this information could be used to prosecute some of the political prisoners currently held by the KGB.
http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/02/wikileaks-belarus-and-israel-shamir/
Index on Censorship
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Index on Censorship is a CIA front
09.02.2011 18:33
Don't get me wrong, alot of the actual content in Index is OK, it's hard to say how much of it is deliberate misinformation, but I know genuinely great liberal writers whose credibility has been completely compromised in the authoritarian countries they were writing about (eg - Cuba) because no-one from Index had the integrity to mention to them that the publication they'd been writing for has a reputation for being a CIA front. After the CIA link was blown the CCF stopped funding Index but last time I looked the Ford Foundation - another CIA front - were still funding Index. Ironically you won't find ANYTHING about the Congress for Cultural Freedom or the CIA on Index's Wikipedia page - maybe someone from Index censored it?
My advice to Indymedia would definitely be to tell Index to FUCK OFF, but please keep this thread at least because Indymedia readers need to see it (and of course this issue has nothing to do with Wikileaks)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congress_for_Cultural_Freedom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_colonels
http://www.voltairenet.org/article30039.html
Frances Stonor Saunders "Who Paid the Piper: The CIA and the Cultural Cold War" (UK) 1999 and "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters" New Press (US) 2000
Wikipedia
When in doubt, shout "CIA"
09.02.2011 19:35
Ray Bord
When in denial, don't even bother to use Google
10.02.2011 16:10
http://www.commarts.uws.edu.au/gmjau/iss1_2008/barker.html
And, a typical act of self-justificatory misdirection from Index's OWN website (misdirection because it fails to mention that both Encounter AND Index were sponsored by the CIA) - -
"The Congress for Cultural Freedom soon turned itself into a permanent organisation of the same name and, a few years later, launched literary and political magazines in Britain, France, Germany and Italy. The British magazine, started in 1953, was called Encounter, and Stephen (Spender, later editor of Index) was an obvious choice as an English literary editor... In 1966, however, its reputation was seriously tarnished (along with the reputation of its editors) when it was revealed that it had been funded from its very beginning by the CIA, and Stephen resigned with a sense of having been exploited and betrayed" That didn't stop him accepting CIA money to found Index however! "We regarded other aspects of American and British foreign policy as short-sighted and counterproductive, namely the tendency to go easy on, or even support, authoritarian right-wing regimes such as those run by Franco in Spain, Salazar in Portugal, or the Shah of Iran, simply because these regimes were anti-communist. Encounter’s sin had consisted not in supporting those regimes, but rather in remaining silent about them."
http://ioc.sagepub.com/content/39/1/155.full.pdf
Mousemat
Oh, I forgot.
10.02.2011 20:21
By that line of reasoning, Indymedia's CIA.
forgetter
Index on Censorship rely on people to forget ;)
13.02.2011 12:19
As for the accusation of conspiracy theories, much of the above is published on Index's OWN website
Fire Place