Skip to content or view screen version

Sex-on-duty police officer jailed

relevant | 08.02.2011 14:48


BBC News Manchester
8 February 2011 Last updated at 13:13
Sex-on-duty Greater Manchester police officer jailed

A former Greater Manchester Police constable who had sex with a vulnerable woman while on duty has been jailed.

Michael Fletcher, 31, of Blackwood Court, Bacup, Lancashire, admitted misconduct in a public office at an earlier hearing.

The court heard that he had sex twice with the woman at her Rochdale home after responding to a welfare call.

He was sentenced at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court to 32 months.

The court was told that Fletcher first had sex with her while on duty on 21 July 2010, when he attended her house in Littleborough to make sure she was safe.

His duties in responding to a welfare call to a vulnerable adult were to contact social workers and ensure the woman was not in danger of being harmed.

He returned to her house later the same evening while off-duty and had sex with her again, the court heard.
'Abused position'

Speaking after the sentence Chief Constable Peter Fahy said: "As soon as this was reported we took swift and decisive action, started an investigation and immediately suspended the officer from duty.

"Fletcher was sent to help this woman, ensure she was safe and arrange appropriate support from other agencies.

"Fletcher abused his position and disgracefully took advantage of the situation and such behaviour within Greater Manchester Police will not be tolerated.

"What this officer did has a huge impact on how the public view the police and the hard work and dedication of the majority of officers has now been undermined by his disgraceful and appalling behaviour."

"Because we dealt with this so robustly, the officer had no choice but to resign and due to the evidence presented before him he also pleaded guilty to the offences.

"No one is above the law, and officers who commit crimes will, quite rightly, be treated exactly the same way as everyone else."

relevant

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

the police are not to be trusted

08.02.2011 14:56

this is an absolute horrible abuse of power, the police are clearly not to be trusted, how many more police officers are there acting worse than criminals

anon


Non news - corporate repost

08.02.2011 18:04

remove

Eye


So...

08.02.2011 19:13

Was Mark Kennedy on duty whilst he was shegging his way through the activist community?

Paul


I beg your parsnips

08.02.2011 20:52

What kind of facist would post something like this, Non news-corporate respost, presumably means "it" thinks that this article is not worthy to be published here. and is accustomed to order his personal slaves to to obey one word orders. Or is it a prowling cop with a less on overtime time and no sex life ?

Non news - corporate repost

08.02.2011 18:04
remove

Eye

Doctors orders


Would a police officer tell a lie?

08.02.2011 21:42

"No one is above the law, and officers who commit crimes will, quite rightly, be treated exactly the same way as everyone else."

Who says the police are not good value for money?

The BBC spends millions on alleged "comedy" which fails to raise as much as a wan smile from me. Mr Top Copper, on the other hand, pressed my funny button straight away. Talented man, obviously..

Stroppyoldgit


er..

09.02.2011 07:23

only... for the cop to be sacked, there would have been a complaint or investigation into his actions, who did the investigation? The cops.
So if "all cops cant be trusted" then the conviction brourght by the cops must also be untrustworthy and they have jailed an inocent man.....

You dont get to have it both ways.
oh and "No one is above the law, and officers who commit crimes will, quite rightly, be treated exactly the same way as everyone else" is a very true statement, consider the case

First offence
Looses job - and a bad reference from the cops can not help his hopes of a job afterwards
Imprisonment

on a first offence, thats pretty harsh, indeed I dont remember the last imprisonment on first offence, sounds like the cops made sure he fell hard.

Aint got a huge amount of love for them but F me that sounds harsh

anon


Sounds harsh?

09.02.2011 12:09

OK, in comparison to rapists and muggers getting bail and sometimes not even receiving prison sentences, this could sound harsh. However, abuse of position to the extent of having sex with a vulnerable person who you're supposed to be checking up on is pretty fucked up. I don't know what the article means when the words "vulnerable person" are used - victim of crime who is otherwise not considered vulnerable or someone with learning difficulties or something similar who would be considered "vulnerable" regardless of whether or not they've been a victim of crime...

Either way, while it's not the norm for people to get prison sentences (especially if they've pleaded guilty) on a first-time offence, I don't think it's particularly harsh... Especially as he was in a position of trust.

What?