Skip to content or view screen version

Don't use Firefox - ALF Snitch writes it

Snitchwatch | 02.01.2011 11:28 | Animal Liberation | World

Where is former Animal Liberation Front prisoner and FBI informant Justin Samuel now? Designing the internet browser you may be using to read this.

Open letter to Mozilla Firefox

A few questions that might be posed to Justin Samuel’s current employers at Mozilla (these are really three ways of asking the same thing):

*Do you feel employing Justin Samuel, someone who has has worked with the FBI as an informant, to be a credibility-compromising to your product, and trust-eroding among its users?

*Can you brand Firefox a “safe and secure” browser with someone who signed a plea agreement obligating him to provide information directly to the FBI?

*Can anyone feel comfortable using Mozilla Firefox 4 knowing a person responsible for making it “secure” has a working relationship with a federal law enforcement agency?

While I don’t believe in “internet security”, I’m still going with the Opera browser… starting now.

- Peter Young

Snitchwatch
- Homepage: http://earthfirstnews.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/mozilla-gets-alf-snitch-to-design-firefox-browser-security-plus-more/

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

They probably don't care...

02.01.2011 11:54

In all honesty Mozilla probably doesn't give a shit, most large companies already work closely with the FBI and NSA to put backdoors in their products to allow federal spying.

Crypto


Bad advice - Opera isn't fully free and open

02.01.2011 14:32

I'm vegan and opposed to snitches, but this is bad advice to use Opera instead of Firefox.

Opera is free as in beer, but it isn't free as in speech. It is closed source software and the license is restrictive meaning it can't be redistributed.

For a security perspective, it is very bad to tie yourself to one company when you can't see the source code. Firefox is totally open source so anyone can see exactly what it does. Closed source software is much more difficult to analyse for security problems or backdoors.

I would recommend any animal rights activists to use Firefox over Opera or Internet Explorer.

Another reason is that Firefox has many more security-based plugins to protect your privacy online.

Maybe the author knows this anyway and is just using this post to embarrass Justin Samuel and dissuade others from snitching. Still, it's not good to give bad advice about security, which makes does me wonder somewhat if this is genuine.

anon


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

another update from the gran-diggers

02.01.2011 16:14

TBH granny-exhuming, small-business terrorising animal rights scum should just fuck off. There's a broad feeling that they deserve everything they get.

I'm glad your own have turned on you, you invertebrate lowlifes.

anon


Use linux!

03.01.2011 09:26

For the love of god, windows and IE are designed for autistic monkeys, use linux, then you have a choice of about 50 browsers, i like luakit, but whatever, firefox is alright (except the animal rights issue, you know using foxes and all). also use noscript plugin, and for the love of god setup tor and get the firefox tor button(plugin), then google "tor test" to be on the safe side.

Microsoft have admitted more then once putting backdoors in their OS (once by request from the CIA), it doesn't matter what browser you use if you use windows you have tons and tons of security issues (I know i know linux have a few too, but a lot less and there's a lot more to do about them)

and one very important tool that all security minded use is wireshark, if anything comes out of your computer that shouldn't you'll can see it.

get nmap and scan your own computer using several options, try and set it up so you can't tell which OS you're using, for example by using "netcat -lp SOME_PORT" to confuse a would be port scanner,

get snort - it's a very nice intrusion detection tool, it will email your root, and also have a /var/log/snort/alert file which you can look at at real time and know if you are being scanned, or whatever.

get vulnerability scanners, there are plenty and spend time trying to exploit your own computer

spend time know your tools, learn their limitations etc.

useful commands:
netstat -utpeeW : shows you all the connections (-uDP, -tCP, -pRogram's name,-eXtended view (twice), -Wide view)
netstat -lptu : shows you all the listening ports (-listening ports, -program's name, -tCP, -uDP)

tcpdump -i -vvv : shows you all of your network traffic, the same as wireshark (-iNterface, -vvv (very very very verbose.))
you can use -w to save in in to a file and then have a closer look at the packets with tcpdump -r

cat /var/log/auth.log will show you who's been logging into your machine ,when and how

lsof -i : will show you all the network files opened

Ok, i guess that's enough for now, it just demonstrates that there are plenty of things to do to secure your connection, and many of these tools are unavailable or proprietary in windows. if you still want to use windows then don't ever bitch about being insecure, it's your lazyass fault.

Time for change


Use Open Source

03.01.2011 18:39

This might damage the credibility of Firefox as a nice company, but there is no evidence of it being a security issue. Firefox is open source meaning that the code that it uses is publicly available for anybody to view. If there was a security breech or a backdoor that allowed authorities to access your browser it would be there for all to see.

Opera is closed source - there could have been a backdoor in there for years for all we know (I'm not saying there is - just that there could be).

The most secure way to use computers is to use open source software, including the operating system.

Slightly Tech


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

STOP USING YOUR COMPUTERS NOW!

04.01.2011 08:37

Then send them all to me, put your tinfoil hats on and sit quietly in the corner of the room.

Crazy Barry


Safety in openness

05.01.2011 12:29

Eric S Raymond has written at least as much Open Software code as the oft quoted Richard Stallman. He describes himself as a libertarian and an anarchist - so far, so good? Yet if you analysed his politics you wouldn't want to use any open software. A self-described gun-nut, he believes that the US should disband it's army and corporations should voluntarily hire mercanies to invade resource rich countries.
So should we boycott every project and cause he has worked on? Not unless you are happy to write your own operating systems and applications. His source code is available for anyone to read and check out, and so isn't affected by his personal politics.

Techie


explanation of "Open Source" for non techies

07.01.2011 20:33

Many people might not be familiar with the term "Open Source", or why it is good.

Computer programs are written in languages, which whilst not like plain English, are fairly readable to those that know the language. So you can see what is going on.

However, computers themselves can run the programs more efficiently if they are converted into "machine language", which is pretty unreadable to humans but very fast for computers. This process is called "compilation". If you only have the compiled program and not the original code, it is very difficult to work out everything the program does.

"Open Source" programs mean that as well as the final compiled program, you can see the program in its original language too. So you can check it for security problems or backdoors.

However, open source programs can't necessarily be distributed for free, so there is a further extension of the concept to "Free Software", which is like open source except in addition the programs are free to be distributed. You can charge for them if you want (it doesn't mean free as in free beer) but there isn't much point, since you can usually get the programs free elsewhere. The "free" in "Free Software" means free as in free speech, i.e. you won't get hassled by the copyright police for sharing the program with others.

anon


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments