Skip to content or view screen version

The Nation joins the campaign against Julian Assange

David Walsh with General Joe | 30.12.2010 15:31 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Social Struggles | World

“Feminist opinion—as the Assange case and the Polanski affair before it have demonstrated—has become one of the means of legitimizing the suppression of nonconformists and political dissidents, and of changing the subject from the great social issues, above all, class oppression and social inequality, to stale and self-pitying concerns.
Those supervising the attack against Assange are no doubt congratulating themselves on its clever design. Mounting it in the guise of a campaign against the sexual molestation of women… how else could such a filthy operation, with its threat of a sweeping assault on democratic rights, be mounted and even legitimized today?
The powers that be know the Pollitts of this world, and the Nation. The magazine’s editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, is, after all, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a leading ruling class think tank whose membership has included numerous CIA directors, along with dozens of US generals and admirals.”

The Nation joins the campaign against Julian Assange
By David Walsh 
30 December 2010

The Nation magazine in the US, with its publication of “The Case of Julian Assange” by columnist Katha Pollitt (posted December 22, 2010), has joined the right-wing campaign against WikiLeaks co-founder Assange, a campaign directed by the highest levels of the American state.
The sexual assault charges against Assange in Sweden are part of an orchestrated effort to divert public attention from the content of the WikiLeaks exposures—the duplicity, hypocrisy and criminality of American and world imperialism—and bury the important revelations in a pile of scandalous garbage. Pollitt has eagerly lent a hand to that effort.
Such a development was predictable, given the history of the journalist and the publication, but that does not make it any less reprehensible… or educational. The arguments employed by Pollitt shed further light on the politically rotten character of contemporary feminism and identity politics generally.
Pollitt has written for the Nation, one of the principal voices of American left liberalism, since 1980 and has had a column in the publication since 1995.
In her recent piece on Assange, Pollitt’s modus operandi is to remove the sex charges from their political context—the determined effort to destroy WikiLeaks and its founder—and assert that defenders of Assange are insensitive to rape and sexual violence against women. This is hardly a new, or persuasive, ploy.
What she has learned from the furor over the allegations against Assange, Pollitt begins by writing, is that “when it comes to rape, the left still doesn't get it.” The self-appointed enlightened one then attempts to set “the left” straight.
She dismisses the concerns of “WikiLeaks supporters,” among whom she obviously does not number herself, about “the zeal with which Swedish authorities are pursuing Assange,” arguing that “it could also be that Sweden is following up because prosecutors get mad when world-class celebrities flee the country and then thumb their noses at them—cf. Roman Polanski.”
This is an obvious and malicious distortion of the Polanski case, but more importantly, it suggests that Assange belongs in the category of “world-class celebrities” trying to get off scot-free for their crimes, i.e., privileged, well-connected miscreants.
The picture painted here turns reality on its head. Assange is being relentlessly pursued and persecuted by the most powerful governments and agencies on earth, with almost unlimited resources at their disposal. Elements within the US media and right-wing political figures have openly called for his assassination. This is a man whose very life is in danger. Why? Because he has helped expose a portion of the Holy of Holies—the secrets of imperialist foreign policy and diplomacy.
WikiLeaks has revealed, for the benefit of the world’s population, how the US government and its allies lie to their populations, conspire against democratic rights, repress opponents, plot “regime change” and prepare aggressive wars.
Assange is not a spoiled, arrogant “world-class celebrity,” except in the imagination of the human rubbish on the Murdoch payroll and such. What is Pollitt talking about?
This is not the first time we have noted the alliance of the extreme right and feminism. [ http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/oct2009/pola-o08.shtml] The latter has assumed deeply reactionary characteristics, misappropriating the movement for women’s rights that at one time was an element of the struggle against oppression.
Pollitt goes on to lambaste Assange’s supporters who have denounced the trumped-up and politically motivated character of the “rape” charges, including Truthout’s Dave Lindorff, filmmaker Michael Moore, MSNBC talk show host Keith Olbermann and feminists Naomi Wolf and Katrin Axelsson. “What's disturbing,” she writes, “is the way some WikiLeaks admirers have misrepresented the allegations, attacked the women and made light of date rape.”
Date rape has nothing to do with it, by the women’s own statements. The case involves consensual relations. Each of the women actively sought a sexual involvement with Assange.
It has been widely reported that one of the “victims” hosted a party for Assange after the alleged crime and publicly boasted about the fact. The same individual once published a guide on the Internet on the means of revenging oneself on a cheating lover. Assange may be guilty of naïveté in associating with these women, but not of anything criminal.
The sexual assault case was taken up, after Swedish authorities first dropped it in embarrassment, and promoted by a prominent lawyer with connections to the upper-echelons of the Swedish ruling elite. The precise role played by the various parties is unclear, along with their respective political or psychological motivations, but the frame-up character of the case against Assange is unmistakable. The stamp that reads “Made in the USA” is all that is missing.
Pollitt, however, has a different view of things. In response to the revelation that one of Assange’s accusers had connections to an anti-Castro group supported by terrorist and former CIA agent Luis Posada Carriles, she exclaims, “You would think the left would be more sensitive to charges of guilt by association—since when did marching in a demonstration mean you sign on to everything its supporters support?”
One has to rub one’s eyes. The Assange affair is preeminently a political affair. It involves the concerted attempt to silence a critic of the US government and military-intelligence apparatus, which includes—centrally—the CIA. Does the dubious political background of one of the alleged victims, which Pollitt does not refute, have no bearing on the case? This is simply part of the Nation journalist’s dishonest effort to hack away at the socio-political sinews of the affair and present it purely as a matter of sexual misconduct.
Pollitt’s argumentation, couched in the subjective, self-satisfied tone peculiar to Nation columnists, is similar to that of the New York Times’ Katrin Bennhold (“The Female Factor”), whose article, “Is It Rape? It Depends on Who Is Asking,” begins: “Is it rape when you have sex with someone who didn’t tell you it was OK, but told you it was OK earlier that night?” Bennhold presents this scenario as the generally accepted reality of the Assange case.
Pollitt concludes her December 22 piece, blandly: “WikiLeaks is revealing information citizens need to know—it's a good thing. Assange may or may not have committed sex crimes according to Swedish law. Why is it so hard to hold those two ideas at once?”
As though those two facts were equivalent! Here you have the outlook of the petty-bourgeois philistine summed up. WikiLeaks has exposed, among many other things, thousands of unreported civilian deaths in Iraq—a world-historical war crime committed by American imperialism. That weighs no more with Pollitt than the complaints of Assange’s jilted or disappointed—or worse—lovers.
Pollitt is the representative of a social milieu. From a Stalinist family background, she belongs to the comfortable “left” circles around the Nation and such publications. In what, however, does this “leftism” consist?
In her autobiographical Learning to Drive: and Other Life Stories, Pollitt writes: “Toward the end of the 1990s… I joined a Marxist study group. This was something I had avoided throughout my twenties and thirties, when Marxism still had some life to it.” The trend in question was the “anti-Bolshevik tendency of council communism.” The passages in her book dealing with this venture are revealing.
Pollitt makes cheap jokes about her short-lived little group, but this dilettantish and impotent activity appears to be the sum-total of her connection to “Marxism” or socialism. She belongs to the generation of middle-class lefts whose earlier association with protest, often identified with Stalinism or Maoism, has long since receded into the past. Upward mobility has brought them affluence, and their endless fixation on gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity is a means of promoting their own immediate economic and social interests.
There is nothing remotely progressive about such politics. Pollitt doesn’t oppose the attacks on the working class or imperialist interventions, much less champion those persecuted by the state, as her role in the Assange case makes eminently clear. Her conceptions and values flow into and merge with those of the privileged layers attached to the Democratic Party and the media establishment. It is not for nothing that one of the pillars of that establishment, the Washington Post, has called her column “the best place to go for original thinking on the left.”
Feminist opinion—as the Assange case and the Polanski affair before it have demonstrated—has become one of the means of legitimizing the suppression of nonconformists and political dissidents, and of changing the subject from the great social issues, above all, class oppression and social inequality, to stale and self-pitying concerns.
Those supervising the attack against Assange are no doubt congratulating themselves on its clever design. Mounting it in the guise of a campaign against the sexual molestation of women… how else could such a filthy operation, with its threat of a sweeping assault on democratic rights, be mounted and even legitimized today?
The powers that be know the Pollitts of this world, and the Nation. The magazine’s editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, is, after all, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a leading ruling class think tank whose membership has included numerous CIA directors, along with dozens of US generals and admirals.
Identity politics in America is increasingly exposed for what it is—a method of duping people, of covering over the enormous social divide, and, not accidentally, enriching a layer of African-Americans, gays and professional feminists. Political charlatans like Pollitts should be objects of derision and contempt.

------

Understanding the critical significance of this historical moment for humankind, the monumental importance of the revalations of wikileaks will summon forth the greatest and grandest assaults the rulers have at there disposal. Be assured they have plenty.

Wikileaks has provided for the lifting of a veil that offers to awaken the world. We must not be fooled into relinquishing this potentially transformative opportunity. Please spread very widely. General Joe







Find details for further publishing below:



The Nation joins the campaign against Julian Assange

David Walsh with General Joe

“Feminist opinion—as the Assange case and the Polanski affair before it have demonstrated—has become one of the means of legitimizing the suppression of nonconformists and political dissidents, and of changing the subject from the great social issues, above all, class oppression and social inequality, to stale and self-pitying concerns.
Those supervising the attack against Assange are no doubt congratulating themselves on its clever design. Mounting it in the guise of a campaign against the sexual molestation of women… how else could such a filthy operation, with its threat of a sweeping assault on democratic rights, be mounted and even legitimized today?
The powers that be know the Pollitts of this world, and the Nation. The magazine’s editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, is, after all, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a leading ruling class think tank whose membership has included numerous CIA directors, along with dozens of US generals and admirals.”

David Walsh with General Joe

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

text

30.12.2010 17:34

From Pollett's article, on the source of the "she's CIA" bit:

I spent a few hours on www.israelshamir.net and learned that: "the Jews" foisted capitalism, advertising and consumerism on harmonious and modest Christian Europe; were behind Stalin's famine in Ukraine; control the banks, the media and many governments; and that "Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is." There are numerous guest articles by Holocaust deniers, aka "historical revisionists." We have now produced on the left an echo chamber like that on the far right, where the scurrilous charges of marginal fanatics are disseminated through electronic media and end up, cleansed of their original associations, as respectable opinion.

context


what?

30.12.2010 20:15

there's a reasonable commentary in here, but it seems clouded in a thick fog of mysogyny. I say that as a man. An alliance of feminism and the right? There is no such alliance. There are some sensible people saying that these charges might be true, and we shouldn't assume they are not, and there are those who assume anyone saying this is working for the CIA, as opposed to being a decent, open, honest human being.

Get off your pedestal, join the human race, and stop throwing crap at everyone who isn't a member of the personality cult of assange and start recognising who it is we we need to fight here. We certainly don't need to stat fighting feminism, which, aside from your petty remarks that feminism is a 'side issue' apart from the 'great struggles' such as class (which is deeply disturbing to hear anyone say), actually represents a bid to liberate humanity from the same people hunting down assange.

man friday


suprise suprise - rightwing-feminist alliances do exist...

31.12.2010 11:49

...for instance the close working relationship of many prominent 2nd wave radical feminists with the christian right in their anti-pornography crusades. The very worst the author of this article does with regards to feminism is to treat it as if it was some kind of monolithic entity, rather than the diverse and often contradictory set of ideologies and movements that it is. Throwing around accuations of misogyny at critics of cetain feminisms or feminists, or at ideological opponents in general, is fairly weak.

dn


Black is White, White is Black!

31.12.2010 13:41

"The sexual assault charges against Assange in Sweden are part of an orchestrated effort to divert public attention from the content of the WikiLeaks exposures"

The Whitehouse is driving the controversy surrounding Julian Assange. Why sink millions into distracting people's attention away from leaks which number just 20 per day and do not give even a vague insight into the reality of the US Government war machine. It is doing this in order to drive global attention toward the content that Wikileaks is "leaking" because the Whitehouse knows that there is nothing substantial within them.

Wikileaks is a decent venture, currently being made squalid by the US "system".

Wikileaks is simply finding that its existence is converging with the interests of the Whitehouse.

The right wing serial human rights abusing Republican party are shouting loudest (in case you hadn't noticed!).

There is nothing in the "diplomatic" cables because, in times of war, diplomats are deliberately kept away from the truth of the squalor of the conduct of the US army.

In time of war, diplomats are no more knowledgeable about reality than your local milkman.

Cablegate is a whitehouse fraud designed to placate the Republican party in order that the Democrats can grease legislation past the senate at a time when it does not have control of the House of Representatives. The Republicans are taking any and all bait in order to find a way back from the squalor of the Bush Presidency.

Diplomatic non-sensitive trivia will do. Anything, so long as people take the bait!

Leopold


alliance?

31.12.2010 14:31

"The very worst the author of this article does with regards to feminism is to treat it as if it was some kind of monolithic entity"

Yes I accept that.

"Throwing around accuations of misogyny at critics of cetain feminisms or feminists, or at ideological opponents in general, is fairly weak."

I accept that too. The label mysogynist is a bit of an exageration on my part. I used it because the author stated that the major social concerns are injustice and class, not patriarchy. This is astonishingly ignorant, but does not make the author a misogynist.

man friday


christ what has happened to this country

03.01.2011 01:29

"I accept that too. The label mysogynist is a bit of an exageration on my part. I used it because the author stated that the major social concerns are injustice and class, not patriarchy. This is astonishingly ignorant, but does not make the author a misogynist."

Do you lot always talk that like or do you spend your lives with your nose in books?
All what you are doing is replacing names like fuckwit and twat with patriarchy and misogynist.
Its still "name calling" and it is still childish no matter how academic you think you are.

Mike MBE Phd MSc BSc GCSE I'm smarter than you


Ooer

03.01.2011 23:41

I feel very humble. Didn't think it was that bad - not like I started a war or anything. I'm going to cry now.

man friday