Skip to content or view screen version

Supporters Call for End to Inhumane Treatment of Bradley Manning

Inhumane Treatment | 22.12.2010 12:42

Quantico, VA, December 22, 2010 – After trying other avenues of recourse, the Bradley Manning Support Network is urging supporters to engage in direct protest in order to halt the punitive conditions of the soldier’s detention. Bradley Manning, 23, has been held in solitary confinement in military jails since his arrest in late May on allegations that he passed classified material to WikiLeaks..

In the wake of an investigative report last week by Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com giving evidence that Manning was subject to “detention conditions likely to create long-term psychological injuries”, Manning’s attorney, David Coombs, published an article at his website on Saturday entitled “A Typical Day for PFC Bradley Manning”. Coombs details the maximum custody conditions that Manning is subject to at the Quantico Confinement Facility and highlights an additional set of restrictions imposed upon him under a Prevention of Injury (POI) watch order.

Usually enforced only through a detainee’s first week at a confinement facility, the standing POI order has severely limited Manning's access to exercise, daylight and human contact for the past five months, despite calls from military psychologists to lift the order and the extra restrictions imposed.

Despite not having been convicted of any crime or even yet formally indicted, the confinement regime Manning lives under includes pronounced social isolation and a complete lack of opportunities for meaningful exercise. Additionally, Manning’s sleep is regularly interrupted. Coombs writes: “The guards are required to check on Manning every five minutes [...] At night, if the guards cannot see PFC Manning clearly, because he has a blanket over his head or is curled up towards the wall, they will wake him in order to ensure he is okay.”

Denver Nicks writes in The Daily Beast that “[Manning’s] attorney […] says the extended isolation — now more than seven months of solitary confinement — is weighing on his client’s psyche. […] Both Coombs and Manning’s psychologist, Coombs says, are sure Manning is mentally healthy, that there is no evidence he’s a threat to himself, and shouldn’t be held in such severe conditions under the artifice of his own protection.”

In an article to be published at Firedoglake.com later today, David House, a friend of Manning’s who visits him regularly at Quantico, says that Manning “has not been outside or into the brig yard for either recreation or exercise in four full weeks. He related that visits to the outdoors have been infrequent and sporadic for the past several months.”

Bradley Manning Support Network founder Mike Gogulski stated that “the Marine Brig is using injury prevention as a vehicle to inflict extreme pre-trial punishment on Bradley Manning. These conditions are not unheard-of during an inmate’s first week at a military jail, but when applied continuously for months and with no end in sight they amount to a form of torture.”

The Bradley Manning Support Network calls upon Quantico base commander COL Daniel Choike and brig commanding officer CWO4 James Averhart to put an end to these inhumane, degrading conditions. Additionally, the Network encourages supporters to phone COL Choike at +1-703-784-2707 or write to him at 3250 Catlin Avenue, Quantico, VA 22134, and to fax CWO4 Averhart at +1-703-784-4242 or write to him at 3247 Elrod Avenue, Quantico, VA 22134, to demand that Bradley Manning’s human rights be respected while he remains in custody.

# # #

References:

“The inhumane conditions of Bradley Manning’s detention”, Glenn Greenwald, 15 December 2010,  http://www.salon.com/news/wikileaks/index.html?story=/o...nning

“A Typical Day for PFC Bradley Manning”, David E. Coombs, 18 December 2010,  http://www.armycourtmartialdefense.info/

“Bradley Manning’s Life Behind Bars”, Denver Nicks, 17 December 2010,  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-12-...ison/

Bradley Manning Support Network,  http://www.bradleymanning.org/

Inhumane Treatment

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Manning - The real hero

22.12.2010 16:03

While all the credit is given to Assange, the real hero in all of this is Manning, He is the one who "allegedly" got those documents and the video of the helicopter strike, he is the one who risked everything and he is the one who is going to get punished for all of this. Assange is just a new celebrity, he isn't likely to spend time in prison, and even if he does it will be a short sentence, Manning faces up to 52 YEARS! We need to start planning a long term campaign and make sure he knows that there are people outside who admire him and will not stop campaigning, and that he will be written as a hero in the history books to make his sacrifice worth a while and make sure others follow in his foot steps.

On the plus side:
Manning expressed disillusionment with American foreign policy, opining that the diplomatic documents expose "almost criminal political back dealings" and expressed a wish that the release of the videos would cause large-scale scandals and lead to "worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms." - Wikipedia

It seems like he already won!

niente


@niente

23.12.2010 15:38

"the real hero in all of this is Manning, He is the one who "allegedly" got those documents"

So if it is alleged, why put the word 'allegedly' in scare-quotes? The truth is these documents were always already available to 3 million people thanks to the US state. Anyone of them could have leaked the documents. Effectively the US state already 'leaked' them deliberately by making them so available to so many people, they must have known that this 'leak' was inevitable.

The case against Manning is weak, and denied by Wikileaks whose deniable procedures mean even Assange doesn't know the source of leaks. Wikileaks have chosen to help defend any one who is accused of the leaks that they republish, but the Guardian claimed to have gotten it's leaks from a third-party. You should bear these truth's in mind while you are defending Bradley Manning, or else you could be accused of merely "defending" him by lionising him.

More importantly, the actual cables should remain the focus of activists attention, not the soap-opera that is being scripted for us on the nightly news.

Danny


agreed

23.12.2010 17:11

The value is in the documents, not in the Assange soap opera, and I suggest we start digging a little into their contents, because I'm willing to bet, if we do, we'd find that some of them are fakes. The cables were a bait, and this whole thing is a spectacle, and we are all the passive observers. One story that sounds really dodgy is the Michael Moore's one about Cuba banning Sicko. a quick search on google show half the pages claiming Cuba banned it, and another quoting Moore as saying it didn't. if they didn't then this is a really transparent manipulation (and can easily be disproved) it's almost too good. but i still stick to the line that Manning should be celebrated and defended, and that Assange can take care of himself, and is in a much better position. He's a self made celeb. If we want to have more of these leaks, if we should expose all of their dirty secrets, we just have to find a way to reward the people who get caught exposing them. Manning would of got away with this if he hasn't bragged about it, but he still did the honest thing.

I hope you're right, and that the case against him will fall apart in court, but I am much less optimistic then you are, either way I think he needs our help much more then Assange.

another important thing is that we don't just take the contents of the leaks as the ultimate truth, scrutinize them, if there are are investigative reporters here please, contact the people in them, confirm or deny the contents. Even if 99% of the contents is genuine some surely isn't.

The real secrets aren't sitting on some network waiting to be hacked, the real state secrets are locked away in a filling cabinet somewhere, or much more likely in a paper shredder. these were just the tip of the iceberg.

niente