Skip to content or view screen version

London Protest - Hot or Not? Move forward

Theresa May | 12.12.2010 18:55 | Public sector cuts | Repression | Social Struggles

I’m still trying to get my head round the Tuition Fees protests, but I’m feeling pretty sure now that people weren’t happy with it, and its not the bacon.

First thing is that struggle is good, it improves independence and confidence and shows that people care, direct action is the way. Problem is, joining a march which is lobbying government doesn’t become direct action no matter how riotous it gets. People may have had the impression that the point of the demo was to get lib dems to vote no to the rises, it was for some, was the violence then just a more coercive lobbying? Punching a copper isn’t useful unless it helps you get what you need, like getting out of a kettle, fair enough if people are angry but we should realize that there’s nothing directly revolutionary about a push around with the pigs. Especially since when the opportunity for direct action came in parliament square it wasn’t used at all. People stood for hours with no dignity waiting to get out of the kettle and when they were finally turned back again they pathetically chanted ‘let us out!’, why didn’t we organize and force our way out? We were there for so long we could have done a workshop on getting out of kettles, then got out with pride and energy. How empowering would that have been? Having said all that congrats to people on Oxford Street, that’s the sort of thing we should all have been doing. We should plan (decentralized) mass actions rather than marches.

So the first point, direct action not lobbying, AND use your anger constructively.

Second, we are getting ‘royally’ fucked by the BBC (and other press), they are really showing themselves for what they are, an arm of the state. How are we fighting this? I don’t agree that any publicity is good publicity, especially when the police are using it to ratchet up their repression. People who were there might not realize just how differently the public feel about these protests to us. They think we’re stuck up and are just out for a fight and that the police couldn’t have done a thing wrong. Nevermind the fact that 1000s of people were just imprisoned in the cold without toilets or water! It’s hardly been mentioned. Good effort to the people keeping up solidarity with Alfie Meadows as well. I don’t know what to do about the press but maybe if we’d had an aim for the day, like shutting something down, or building something up, the media wouldn’t be able to portray it like mindless thuggery.

Finally, we have to organize and educate ourselves a lot better, maybe having an anti-capitalist direct action network specifically for this movement. We were pushing each other around on Thursday as much as we were pushing the police, we probably injured ourselves as much as the police did because some idiots choose to throw from the back of a crowd. There were arrests that just didn’t need to happen. Worst of all we got stuck in a square for 8 hours, and took it out on lowly PCs rather than their bosses (which is exactly what they want). Now we’ll have to face water cannons.

Sorry to be so negative, there was really good stuff on the day as well. Hope people will respond to this so we can discuss and learn.

Theresa May

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

organisation!

12.12.2010 19:40

I agree. Climate Camp in London in 2009 seems to me a useful point of inspiration, although I'm sure people can think of plenty of others. For a start there was serious organisations behind it which meant that there was food available and workshops held. Infrastructure is useful, especially when you know you're going to be penned in somewhere for hours!

C


What you're looking for..

12.12.2010 22:03

Look up network X, has an event page on facebook for a national gathering, direct action movement against capitalism. Is just about to begin.

@


capitalism in the guise of socialism

12.12.2010 23:10

Human beings naturally seek to dominate their surroundings; the land, the plants and animals on it, and other human beings too! Controlling any head (capita) of other people is capitalism. It is a form of human ownership or slavery, as opposed to material ownership (like when an independent tradesman owns the tools of his trade).

If we simply seize control from the capitalists, we become the new capitalists. Only when humans stop trying to control other humans, can we be free from capitalism.

One of the ways that humans control other humans it by taxing the productive workers for the benefit of others. No matter how deserving the others may be, if there is a mechanism by which some people can FORCE others to give up the fruits of their own labour, there will be a capitalist system in place.

The students are merely seeking to make the government (a weapon of force taxation on the workers), favour their particular cause. As good a cause as that may be, they are pursuing the continuity of capitalism, be it in the guise of socialism.

There is an irony though. The students are trying to defeat capitalism in the form of debt or financial slavery that future generations of students may opt into.

anarchist


The BBC

13.12.2010 10:37

We did a Freedom to Protest demo on the Friday outside New Scotland Yard, now what was interesting was the BBC cameramen with whom we chatted for a while. They had been beaten by the police at demos when they were obviously journalists, I have seen a Sky news camera man repeatedly beaten at the G20 demo and a pack of his fellow journalists shouting at the police to stop and then there was the famous incident with an ITN camera crew at Kingsnorth whereby they were harassed and intimidated by FIT teams.
So we have a scenario whereby camera crews go out and get beaten by the police and their bosses broadcast utter bollocks about the police not being violent enough. It must rile them and the NUJ have demonstrated against the Met' before. Is there any way we can get some of these people on side? Any way in which we can put a spanner in the corporate media works? One thing that could work is demos outside the offices of the worst offenders. This of course is not new we have had this is the AR movement for years zero reporting when we get half killed by violent police and the opposition, maximum reporting when someone gets hatemail or unwanted catalogues in the post. What is somewhat annoying is for years fellow activists have accused all animal rights people of violence and bought the corporate propaganda. Well....you ain't seen nothing yet. Stamp on these lies, once you are demonised you face double figure sentences and when someone gets seriously hurt and their life is in the balance "s/he deserved it" will be the comment of the day, when someone gets killed blame will be pointed at other activists and the victim for being an "extremist".

The media plays an important role in police violence without media support they are screwed, thanks to the poster for pointing it out.

Lynn Sawyer


Which channels, Lynne?

13.12.2010 12:37

"So we have a scenario whereby camera crews go out and get beaten by the police and their bosses broadcast utter bollocks about the police not being violent enough."

Which channel broadcast reports saying the police were not violent enough? I'm keen to know because otherwise I'm just going to assume that you are making that up.

I saw the BBC and others report that the police should have planned better, and raised questions about why Prince Charles was allowed to take a route where he would obviously encounter lots of protesters (a question raised on Indymedia too). But I've not, as yet, seen or heard a TV channel's own presenters calling for more violent action by the police. An example would be great - thanks.

Norvello


which chanels?,BBC,ITN national live broadcasts have all focused on the "mob"

14.12.2010 01:19

mainly showing images of transport police rather than TSG riot squads & police charges. They pretty much,all posed rhetorical questions on wether police used enough force& in the case of the royal motorcade guns, after concentrating on alleged student violence.
Only those who search for it on the web got more balanced glimpses.

James