Skip to content or view screen version

Madeleine Ann Selling fur again.

FUR FREE MIDLANDS | 30.10.2010 13:15 | Animal Liberation | Birmingham

FUR SCUM MADELEINE ANN THOUGHT SHE COULD GET AWAY WITH SELLING FUR AGAIN THIS YEAR. WRONG. WE CAUGHT YOU.

We now call upon everyone to do what they can to stop them selling fur again. we have a few more targets to release soon but lets deal with this stubborn old fur hag first!



Contact Madeleine Ann:

Solihull(main Shop):

Madeleine Ann, 45 Drury Lane, Solihull, West Midlands, B91 3BP
 stratford@madeleineann.co.uk
Tel: 0121 704 9454

Stratord-Upon-Avon:

Madeleine Ann, 39 Sheep Street, Stratford-Upon-Avon, CV37 6EE
 stratford@madeleineann.co.uk
Tel: 01789 297 229

FUR FREE MIDLANDS

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

boo!

30.10.2010 15:59

You appear to be trying to shut down small businesses because they sell fur hats. You had a go at my local Army surplus store as well recently.

With thuggish behaviour like this targeting quit ordinary people, can anyone really be that surprised that the Police send agents into your midst? I think they wouldn't be doing their jobs if they let the likes of you run around smashing peoples lives up willy-nilly.

I hope you think again about what you're doing. As well being very dodgy morally you're very much putting yourself and indymedia on the wrong side of the law with these inflammatory posts. It's like something out of Combat 18.

anon


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Agreed

30.10.2010 17:02

I second the above commenter.

>>>> FUR SCUM MADELEINE ANN THOUGHT SHE COULD GET AWAY WITH SELLING FUR AGAIN THIS YEAR. WRONG. WE CAUGHT YOU.

Thought she could get away!?! What you mean: thought she could get away with doing something legal? Since when were you in charge of the law dickhead?

>>>> We now call upon everyone to do what they can to stop them selling fur again. we have a few more targets to release soon but lets deal with this stubborn old fur hag fir

Well good luck with that one. Good luck in using your intimidation and threats.

camlast


wrong attitude?

30.10.2010 17:37

This is NOT about whether you should or should not campaign against those selling furs. This is just about the attitude expressed that there is anything wrong about those you have gotten to agree under while under threat to stop selling fur "going back on their word".

Sorry -- but it's not like that. You can reasonably complain about anybody who has pretended to come to your point of view, who has willingly ceased to deal in animal parts. But anybody whose agreement you have only under duress is entitled to revert the moment your force is removed. Yes, force may in the short run be more quickly effective than convincing; but you have to question durability of that effectivenss. THAT takes time too.

Hey, I'd be the same way too. Those with more force to apply might get my temporary agreement to things against my will. But that lasts only as long as they can still apply force and heaven help them if they are ever down in front of me where I can put a boot in. It's how we humans behave. When I force somebody to do something instead of convincing them, the nTHAT has become an issue which might over shadow the rights and the wrongs of the original matter.

MDN


to the above?

30.10.2010 18:30

who gives a fuck what you think, you think people should be governed by the law? you care about posh boutiques going under? you are trolling get off indy.

good luck to the campaign against her, i know i will be getting in touch!

ANARCHIST


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

ANARCHISTs = sad little spiteful people who secretly like to pick on someone

30.10.2010 19:32

Probably picked last for the team sport at school and generally got bullied.
Guess its not their fault.

Wonder if they were 'caught out' and their spitefulness was publicised to their friends / work collegues and family, would they be full of shame and remorse once people realised what they are like.

No different to that Mary Bale woman who put the cat in the bin.
Was mortified... that people saw her for what she is.

Never, ever, ever tell an anarchist a secret about yourself or anything because they have no scruples about screwing you over in the nastiest way possible

cable dance


Completely missing the point...

30.10.2010 23:41

The various trolls and animal abuse apologists here are completely missing the point as usual.

This message is aimed at other animal rights activists, not you. Animal rights, unlike human rights, doesn't rely on getting approval from the human population. We would think it is wrong to farm or trap animals for fur, and right to attack those who do, even if every single other human on the planet disagreed with us. Because we know the animals being abused would agree with us.

We can argue whether it is good tactically, but from our moral viewpoint it is totally justified.

And MDN, you are confusing rhetoric with overly literal interpretation, as usual.

I think the truth is:
animal abusers = sad little spiteful people who secretly like to pick on someone/something.
animal rights activists = people who always stood up to bullies and fought for what is right, even if it was unpopular.

Fur-farmed animals spend their entire short life in tiny wire cages going totally insane (they usually roam large territories) before being anally electrocuted. Trapped animals die an agonising death, often chewing their own limbs off in a desperate attempt to escape. This is the reality of the situation, and I'm sorry, anyone who is a part of this hideous abuse deserves everything they get, in my opinion. Utter scum.

vegan


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments