cant wait! fucking great to see!

At least think twice. Think about the message you would be sending.

It's one thing to protest the decisions/positions of an emeny political party.
It's quite another to try to DISRUPT their political organization.

The problem here is that it cuts both ways. Either we want to have democracy and the idiots get their say too no matter how wrongheaded that might be or we don't. Unless you qualify what you want to accomplish the message you would be sending is "we are fascists of the left". In which case while the capitalists are my enemies you are also (the enemy of an enemy is not necessarily my friend).

Luckily, for the time being I can concentrate on the capitalists and ignore you as you don't have diddly squat power.

Please ignore the middle class liberal/BNP troll above

The people forming the unauthorised march will be taking it upon themselves to protect their future from the ConDem government, since standing at the sidelines protesting your corner when massive attacks are coming your way is pure neglience. Do you think the people meeting do not understand that their cuts are going to have a detrimental impact on working people? Of course they do, now people will show that they won't take it.

I hope people are organising into groups among themselves and not hoping that the march will spontaneously become effectively disruptive solely the existent of a stated militant march. So come on people! There's much preparation needed and fun to be had!

The usual definition is somebody jumping in with opinions NOT honestly theirs with the sole intent of sowing disruption. You believe that of me?

And ROFLOL not a "mddle class" (your usage of that term) liberal. Not a "liberal" at all.

A REAL anarchist recognizes that any rights claimed for ourselves we have to acknowledge to others. Sorry, but that means if I claim the right to disrupt the POLITICAL organization of others then I confer upon them the right to disrupt mine. No right to complain if they do.

Are you REALLY menaing to say that you want this fight with the ruling class (and the people who for whatever foolish reason support their rule in prefernece to ours) carried out with guns instead of ballots? You fancy our chances would be better?

I wasn't saying what you should do but asking you to THINK about all of the implications of choices of action. To suggest that maybe we should limit our actions at the POLITICAL organization of our enemies is a different matter from what actions we might take against them in other contexts.

Real anarchists respect the right of the ruling social order to organise amongst itself? What anarchists are you talking about? Anarchists are in permanent conflictuality with these structures, people and organisations, since they are the force which organises and reorganises society in their interests to preserve positions of privlege. I'd say the majority of anarchos are fully aware that their subversive actions all going to be clamped down upon by the State, so they don't waste to much time whining but call for solidarity in the face of repression.
Also, most anarchists reject the notion of rights because due their rejection of a hierarchical body holding authority over the population, hence to have rights structures need to be inplace to allow them. 'Real anarchists' call for liberation.

"Real anarchists' call for liberation"

Including from pseudo anarchists who think it's about a fashion statement.

And no of course not. No anarchists think of "rights" as being fixed. But neither are all of us opposed to making social conventions. Stop confusing advice to THINK from giving anybody orders.

Democracy is a social convention. Real anarchists think about origins and base meanings. What are we doing when we do a "show of hands" except counting potential sword arms on one side or the other. And maybe a "voice vote" makes sense too, because push come to shove it might not be just pure numbers on each side since enthusiasm and determination count too.

You want something else at the national/politcal level? Please frend, I am NOT telling you not to choose to make it decision by force instead. But I'm afraid I'd be sick of your bleating about how unfair as they gunned you down. REA:L anarchists are willing to accept responsibility for the consequences of their choices.

Let me ask you a question. Is your anarchism entirely theory or have you ever DONE THINGS? Organized groups which carried out some constructive purpose* while operating under anarchist principles. You did this WITHOUT your group having consensus as to some conventions about how your decision making porcess would work? Could even start with what you mean by consensus (does everybody have to be happy with the decision or just accept that no other compromise would be better).

* In other words, I'm talking about accomplishing things beyond running a demo, etc. I'm talking about BUILDING something.

'Real Anarchists' Lol.
'Please ignore the middle class liberal/BNP troll above' What are you on?
Anyone who thinks any different is a'TROLL!' or ' FASCIST!' or my favorite 'MIDDLE CLASS'.
99% of the anarchists I've met have been middle class. You lot are kidding yourselves if you think you've got a working class movement.
Do you wanna to live like common people? Wanna do whatever common people do?
Lols

'Real Anarchists' Lol.
'Please ignore the middle class liberal/BNP troll above' What are you on?
Anyone who thinks any different is a'TROLL!' or ' FASCIST!' or my favorite 'MIDDLE CLASS'.
99% of the anarchists I've met have been middle class. You lot are kidding yourselves if you think you've got a working class movement.
Do you wanna to live like common people? Wanna do whatever common people do?
Lols

You are talking about the absolute basics of anarchist practice....working in groups of radicals and wider community groups isn't a new idea. Fucking hell, the UK hardly has a summit hoping movment to talk about!