America's Holy Crusade against the Muslim World.
Michel Chossudovsky and General Joe | 30.08.2010 17:34 | Anti-militarism | Social Struggles | Terror War | World
"The fact that the 9/11 attacks were not instigated by Muslims has rarely been acknowledged by the Muslim community. Al Qaeda's ongoing relationship to the CIA, its role as a US sponsored "intelligence asset" going back to to the Soviet-Afghan war is not mentioned. (Michel Chossudovsky, America's "War on Terrorism" Global Research, Montreal, 2005)
Since the early 1980s, Washington has covertly supported the most conservative and fundamentalist factions of Islam, largely with a view to weakening secular, nationalist and progressive movements in the Middle East and Central Asia. Known and documented, the fundamentalist Wahhabi and Salafi missions from Saudi Arabia, dispatched not only to Afghanistan but also to the Balkans and to the Muslim republics of the former Soviet republics were covertly supported by US intelligence. (Ibid) What is often referred to as "Political Islam" is in large part a creation of the US intelligence apparatus (with the support of Britain's MI6 and Israel's Mossad)."
Since the early 1980s, Washington has covertly supported the most conservative and fundamentalist factions of Islam, largely with a view to weakening secular, nationalist and progressive movements in the Middle East and Central Asia. Known and documented, the fundamentalist Wahhabi and Salafi missions from Saudi Arabia, dispatched not only to Afghanistan but also to the Balkans and to the Muslim republics of the former Soviet republics were covertly supported by US intelligence. (Ibid) What is often referred to as "Political Islam" is in large part a creation of the US intelligence apparatus (with the support of Britain's MI6 and Israel's Mossad)."
America's Holy Crusade against the Muslim World.
Michel Chossudovsky
We have reached a decisive transition in the evolution of US military doctrine. The "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) directed against Al Qaeda launched in the wake of 9/11 is evolving towards a full-fledged "war of religion", a "holy crusade" directed against the Muslim World.
US military dogma and war propaganda under the Bush administration, was predicated on combating Islamic fundamentalism rather than targeting Muslims. "This is not a war between the West and Islam, but .. a war against terrorism." So-called "Good Muslims" are to be distinguished from "Bad Muslims":
"The dust from the collapse of the twin towers had hardly settled on 11 September 2001 when the febrile search began for "moderate Muslims", people who would provide answers, who would distance themselves from this outrage and condemn the violent acts of "Muslim extremists", "Islamic fundamentalists" and "Islamists". Two distinct categories of Muslims rapidly emerged: the "good" and the "bad"; the "moderates", "liberals" and "secularists" versus the "fundamentalists", the "extremists" and the "Islamists"." (Tariq Ramadan, Good Muslim, bad Muslim, New Statesman, February 12, 2010)
In the wake of 9/11, the Muslim community in most Western countries was markedly on the defensive. The "Good Muslim" "Bad Muslim" divide was broadly accepted. The 9/11 terrorist attacks allegedly perpetrated by Muslims were not only condemned, Muslim communities also supported the US-NATO invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, as part of a campaign directed against Islamic fundamentalism.
The fact that the 9/11 attacks were not instigated by Muslims has rarely been acknowledged by the Muslim community. Al Qaeda's ongoing relationship to the CIA, its role as a US sponsored "intelligence asset" going back to to the Soviet-Afghan war is not mentioned. (Michel Chossudovsky, America's "War on Terrorism" Global Research, Montreal, 2005)
Since the early 1980s, Washington has covertly supported the most conservative and fundamentalist factions of Islam, largely with a view to weakening secular, nationalist and progressive movements in the Middle East and Central Asia. Known and documented, the fundamentalist Wahhabi and Salafi missions from Saudi Arabia, dispatched not only to Afghanistan but also to the Balkans and to the Muslim republics of the former Soviet republics were covertly supported by US intelligence. (Ibid) What is often referred to as "Political Islam" is in large part a creation of the US intelligence apparatus (with the support of Britain's MI6 and Israel's Mossad).
The Ground Zero Mosque
Recent developments suggest a breaking point, a transition from "the war on terrorism" to the outright demonization of Muslims. While underscoring the freedom of religion, the Obama administration is "beating the drums" of a broader war against Islam:
“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country... This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable." (quoted in Obama Backs Ground Zero Mosque; Iranian Link Questioned, Israel National News, August 15, 2010)
Beneath the political smokescreen, the distinction between "Good Muslims" and "Bad Muslims" is being scrapped. The proposed Ground Zero mosque is allegedly being funding by "the radical rogue Islamic state of Iran ... as the United States is stepping up sanctions on the regime in retaliation for its support of terrorism and what is feared to be an illegal nuclear-weapons development program." ( Ground Zero mosque developers refuse to outright reject funding from Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - NYPOST.com, August 19, 2010)
The rising tide of xenophobia, sparked by the proposed Ground Zero mosque and community center, has all the appearances of a PSYOP (Psychological Operation) which contributes to fomenting hatred against Muslims throughout the Western World.
The objective is to instil fear, rouse and harness citizens' unbending support for the next stage of America's "long war", which consists in waging "humanitarian" aerial attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, portrayed by the media as endorsing the terrorists.
While "all Muslim are not terrorists", all terrorist attacks (planned or realized) are reported by the media as being perpetrated by Muslims. In America, the Muslim community as a whole is being targeted. Islam is described as a "religion of war". The proposed mosque and community center are being heralded as "violating the sanctity of Ground Zero".
"..opening a mosque at Ground Zero is offensive and disrespectful to the city and the people who died in the attacks. The project is “spitting in the face of everyone murdered on 9/11.” (Plan to build mosque at Ground Zero angers New Yorkers ,National Post, May 17, 2010)
"Homegrown Terrorists"
The arrests on trumped up charges, as well as the show trials of alleged "homegrown" Islamic terrorists, perform an important function. They sustain the illusion, in the inner consciousness of Americans, that "Islamic terrorists" not only constitute a real threat but that the Muslim community to which they belong is broadly supportive of their actions:
"[T]he threat increasingly comes not from strangers with rough English and dubious passports. Instead, it resides much closer to home: in urban townhouses, darkened basements -- anywhere with an Internet connection. Homegrown terrorism is the latest incarnation of the al-Qaeda threat." How terror came home to roost, Ottawa Citizen, August 27, 2010, report on an alleged homegrown terrorist attack in Canada)
From a process of selective targeting of Muslims with radical tendencies (or allegedly associated with "terrorist organizations"), what is now unfolding is a generalized process of demonization of an entire population group. Muslims are increasingly the object of routine discrimination and ethnic profiling. They are considered a potential threat to national security. The threat is said to be "much closer to home", "within your neighborhood", in other words what is unfolding is an all out witch-hunt reminiscent of the Spanish inquisition.
In turn, Al Qaeda is described as a powerful multinational terrorist organization (possessing WMDs) with subsidiaries in a number of Muslim countries: Al Qaeda is present (with corresponding acronyms) in various geopolitical hotspots and war theaters: -Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) (comprised of Al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Jihad of Yemen), Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia (Jamaah Islamiyah), Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb, Harakat al-Shabaab Mujahideen in Somalia, the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, etc.
At no moment is the issue of atrocities committed against several million Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan considered a terrorist act by the occupation forces.
The American Inquisition
A "war of religion" is unfolding, with a view to justifying a global military crusade. In the inner consciousness of many Americans, the "holy crusade" against Muslims is justified. While President Obama may uphold freedom of religion, the US inquisitorial social order has institutionalized patterns of discrimination, prejudice and xenophobia directed against Muslims. Ethnic profiling applies to travel, the job market, access to social services and more generally to socila mobility.
The American Inquisition as an ideological construct, which is, in many regards, is similar to the inquisitorial social order prevailing in France and Spain during the Middle Ages. The inquisition, which started in France in the 12th century, was used as a justification for conquest and military intervention. (See Michel Chossudovsky, 9/11 and the "American Inquisition", Global Research, September 11, 2008).
The arrests, trials and sentences of so-called "homegrown" terrorists" (from within America's Muslim community) on trumped up charges sustain the legitimacy of the Homeland Security State and its inquisitorial legal and law enforcement apparatus.
An inquisitorial doctrine turns realities upside down. It is a social order based on lies and fabrications. But because these lies emanate from the highest political authority and are part of a widely held "consensus", they invariably remain unchallenged. And those who challenge the inquisitorial order or in any way oppose America's military or national security agenda are themselves branded as "conspiracy theorists" or outright terrorists.
Beyond the process of inquisitorial arrests and prosecution, which outdwarfs the Spanish inquisition, an expedient extrajudicial assassination program sanctioned by the White House has been launched. This program allows US special forces to kill American citizens and suspected homegrown terrorists:: "A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"? (See Chuck Norris, Obama's US Assassination Program? "A Shortlist of U.S. Citizens specifically Targeted for Killing"?,. Global Research, August 26, 2010)
The objective is to sustain the illusion that "America is under attack" and that Muslims across the land are complicit and supportive of "Islamic terrorism".
The demonization of Muslims sustains a global military agenda. Under the American inquisition, Washington has a self-proclaimed holy mandate to extirpate Islam and "spread democracy" throughout the world. What we are dealing with is an outright and blind acceptance of the structures of power and political authority. America's holy crusade against the Muslim World is an outright criminal act directed against all of us.
-----
Please spread widely all over the world. Form reading and discussion groups to inform as many people as possible. Help get this perspective into the schools, faith based communities, and throughout your progressive circles (many have been reluctant to see 911 as the psychological operations attack on the American people that it was) and into mainstream media outlets such as NPR (National Propaganda Radio) though a little “fibbing” as to your “statement” or “concern” will usually be necessary.
This is not too big to take on. We must take it on and force our rulers to take another course. Not doing is too dark to consider. Read failure is not an option! General Joe
PS Al Qaeda is 'Al CIAda.' Pass it on.
Michel Chossudovsky and General Joe
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Re. the Spanish Inquisition witch-hunt
30.08.2010 18:14
That put aside, most of this is relatively interesting. But it does get a bit annoying when you Global Research sorts have to give everything labels - PSYOPS and NLP are really nothing more than propaganda - there's no need to mask it in pseudoscientific terms for the sake of dramatic conspiracy theorising.
Comatus
e-mail: comatus1649@riseup.net
Style
31.08.2010 11:18
Shorthand Comatus, shorthand.
Article writer is simply shortening the essay by not going off an a tangent all the time. Imagine how long this would be writer had to explain everything!
T
There is no holy war against muslims!
31.08.2010 11:20
The 9/11 inside job theories have been debunked long ago! 9/11 was NOT an inside job look at this : http://www.debunking911.com
There is also no holy war against muslims. Muslims are still allowed to go about their business and practice their religon freely.
Poster
Undermined by its basic assumptions
31.08.2010 13:49
Leaving aside the normal 9/11 conspiracy lunacy, this piece falls apart when you look at the three major assumptions it uses as its foundation:
1) The assumption that because the US once gave its backing to a group means it must have total control of it now.
Nope. It’s been a major embarassment to the US that groups it has backed covertly in the past have come back to bite it on the arse. By your logic anyone who has been employed by the US is still in its control – what, like Ken O Keefe? It's also like claiming that former-troothers who now slag off the troof movement must still be working for it.
2) The assumption that it’s a big hush-hush secret that the US covertly backed Islamic groups in Afghanistan.
Erm, it’s the topic of a Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts film. I’m not sure how much more mainstream it could get than that.
3) The assumption that the US really is driven by a desire for a “religious war” against Muslims.
Oh right. So the US will be invading Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar next, will it? No, of course it won't. And if this was the long game, why spend so much time helping to arm and train Muslim groups in Afghanistan back in the days when the big bad was the Commies?
These assumptions are not only wrong, they obviously contradict each other. Can't Global Research stick to spamming the US site rather than the UK one?
Norvello
The Holy War
31.08.2010 13:55
There is no war against the muslims period. The muslims just happen to be in the way of the oil & gas.
9/11 was just a hair trigger waiting to be pulled. Why should the Americans not have been the one to pull it. In war all sides mutilate themselves from time to time in order to sell offensive attacks on the fabricated enemy to their own people. Government is no different than anything else. If it needs something it still has to rally its supporters. Passing legislation to order the people to war is too difficult in this modern era. To many obstacles.
A second "Pearl Harbour"? That'll do nicely thank you very much.
America just did what all empire seeking nations do. Empire making is all about how many of your own kind you can kill, to further your wider strategic aims.
Its also the reason only tyrants and lunatics are empire builders. It takes a tyrant and a lunatic to even consider murdering his own damn people.
Charles
@Charles & @ Global Research
31.08.2010 14:50
If the whole point of setting up 9/11 was to nab the oil in Iraq why didn't the conspirators bother fabricating one linking bit of evidence to Iraq, instead implicating the Saudis, US allies?
This is not to say the US didn't use 9/11 in a hamfisted way to justify the "war on terror" - of course they did, that's common, public knowledge. But you'd have thought if the conspirators could do all the amazing things the conspiraloons claim they could do (steer planes / holograms into buildings at the precise points where they had managed to preload piles of super explosives without the thousands of people who worked there noticing, etcetera...), one little scrap of A4 with a faked letterhead from the House of Saddam should have been a piece of piss.
I've asked this question loads of times, and noone from Global Research has bothered to answer.
Norvello
Theres no mention...
01.09.2010 18:00
stupid