Double standards
hard up, skint & broke | 30.07.2010 09:22
Seen this article in the Observer - the local (Bristol) free paper.
Dated Thursday July 29th 2010
I writ about the first article but left the second one in - for the hell of it!
With the authorities claiming that cut-backs are austerity measures as a resulte of a reccession, threatening our services; why are they surprised when individual households make cut-backs.
It makes sense the first bill not to pay is the poll-tax, now re-branded as the council tax.
It is clear that we are not getting value for money, so why waste it?
Dated Thursday July 29th 2010
I writ about the first article but left the second one in - for the hell of it!
With the authorities claiming that cut-backs are austerity measures as a resulte of a reccession, threatening our services; why are they surprised when individual households make cut-backs.
It makes sense the first bill not to pay is the poll-tax, now re-branded as the council tax.
It is clear that we are not getting value for money, so why waste it?
hard up, skint & broke
Original article on IMC Bristol:
http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/692798