G20 Plan for Prosperity: Rubber Bullets and Shredded Social Safety Net
Paul Jay (repost) | 14.07.2010 18:28 | G20 London Summit | Globalisation | Repression | Social Struggles | World
targeted freedom of speech and assembly, putting the world’s poor and working people on notice.
The Toronto G-20 summit sent a message to poor and working people in Europe and North America. “You will pay for the global financial crisis through cuts to your social safety nets. There will be no taxing of those who actually caused the crisis and made fortunes in the various bubbles over the last decades.”
The Toronto G-20 summit sent a message to poor and working people in Europe and North America. “You will pay for the global financial crisis through cuts to your social safety nets. There will be no taxing of those who actually caused the crisis and made fortunes in the various bubbles over the last decades.”
Of course not in so many words — what they said was they had committed to fiscal plans that will at least halve deficits by 2013 and stabilize or reduce government debt-to-GDP ratios by 2016. That means austerity plans, which was pretty much what was on the agenda before the countries got there.
This was bad enough. But there was another message, too, sent through the Canadian police: “If you don’t like it, how about a rubber bullet?” It looks like G-20 countries will deal with opposition to their plans through martial law and police brutality.
I was there in Toronto, where police turned the downtown center into something resembling martial law. The invocation of an archaic piece of legislation called the “Public Works Protection Act” at the G20 site essentially suspended probable cause, giving police the rights of search and seizure to anyone, anywhere in the area. In other parts of the city peaceful demonstrators were charged with “conspiracy to commit mischief” and “disturbing the Queen’s peace”.
Canadians learned that there was no right to freedom of assembly and no freedom of speech as long as extraordinary measures could be rationalized.
And what were the circumstances? Well, in the midst of twenty thousand peaceful demonstrators were around one hundred people dressed in black (known as the Black Bloc tactic[1]). At a certain point on Saturday afternoon, they broke away from the main protest march, and ran up and down Yonge Street breaking windows. Four police cars were trashed and burned. There is evidence a few of the cars were abandoned by police for hours before they were set upon. On one such car, protesters painted the words “bait”.
There was nothing very secret about the Black Bloc’s intentions or plans. There is evidence that the police had infiltrated the group, but in any case, they actually published most of their plans on a public web site. Yet in footage captured by a freelance journalist and dozens of cams posted on YouTube, police can be seen[2] standing by for as long as an hour or more while the rampage occurred.
Was it a deliberate plan by the security forces (led by the RCMP), or a lack of resources as police claimed? When you try to answer that, keep in mind the Canadian government spent close to a billion dollars on security that included around 19,000 police on the streets.
In any case, television images of burning police cars became the rationale for almost a thousand arrests, mostly not of people wearing black, but of ordinary demonstrators. We know of times when people sat cross-legged holding up peace signs had rubber bullets fired at them. Journalists were manhandled, thrown to the ground, beaten with batons or punched in the face or gut, which happened to Jesse Rosenfeld[3] (writing for the British paper The Guardian) and our own Jesse Freeston[4] at The Real News.
The public has a right to know whether police are or are not abusing their powers. And the public can’t know this without professional journalists with the courage to report from the centre of the storm. These journalists must be able to stand their ground if police try to move them, and the law must protect their right to do so. Without this, we are on our way to a police state.
Canadians are still processing the Toronto protest. What happened with the $1 billion the federal government is spending on security? Are the people of Ontario going to put up with the Public Works Protection Act, implemented quietly for the G-20? Will they accept the principle that the police can declare any protest or demonstration an illegal assembly? Will they demand full accountability from politicians and the police?
If the protest marked a turning point for the city, then it also marked a turning point for the world. If the Toronto G-20 is the shape of things to come, then people faced with drastic reductions in their living standards will be denied their freedom of speech and assembly at the snap of a police officer’s or politician’s fingers.
The firing of those rubber bullets should be a shot heard round the world.
You can watch a collection of G-20 video reports, including “Doves on finance reform, hawks on austerity”[5] with Rob Johnson, at the Real News Network.[6]
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc
[2] http://bit.ly/cWrDsA
[3] http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/journalist_describes_being_beaten_arrested_by
[4] http://bit.ly/accJUc
[5] http://bit.ly/dccOro
[6] http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=395
This was bad enough. But there was another message, too, sent through the Canadian police: “If you don’t like it, how about a rubber bullet?” It looks like G-20 countries will deal with opposition to their plans through martial law and police brutality.
I was there in Toronto, where police turned the downtown center into something resembling martial law. The invocation of an archaic piece of legislation called the “Public Works Protection Act” at the G20 site essentially suspended probable cause, giving police the rights of search and seizure to anyone, anywhere in the area. In other parts of the city peaceful demonstrators were charged with “conspiracy to commit mischief” and “disturbing the Queen’s peace”.
Canadians learned that there was no right to freedom of assembly and no freedom of speech as long as extraordinary measures could be rationalized.
And what were the circumstances? Well, in the midst of twenty thousand peaceful demonstrators were around one hundred people dressed in black (known as the Black Bloc tactic[1]). At a certain point on Saturday afternoon, they broke away from the main protest march, and ran up and down Yonge Street breaking windows. Four police cars were trashed and burned. There is evidence a few of the cars were abandoned by police for hours before they were set upon. On one such car, protesters painted the words “bait”.
There was nothing very secret about the Black Bloc’s intentions or plans. There is evidence that the police had infiltrated the group, but in any case, they actually published most of their plans on a public web site. Yet in footage captured by a freelance journalist and dozens of cams posted on YouTube, police can be seen[2] standing by for as long as an hour or more while the rampage occurred.
Was it a deliberate plan by the security forces (led by the RCMP), or a lack of resources as police claimed? When you try to answer that, keep in mind the Canadian government spent close to a billion dollars on security that included around 19,000 police on the streets.
In any case, television images of burning police cars became the rationale for almost a thousand arrests, mostly not of people wearing black, but of ordinary demonstrators. We know of times when people sat cross-legged holding up peace signs had rubber bullets fired at them. Journalists were manhandled, thrown to the ground, beaten with batons or punched in the face or gut, which happened to Jesse Rosenfeld[3] (writing for the British paper The Guardian) and our own Jesse Freeston[4] at The Real News.
The public has a right to know whether police are or are not abusing their powers. And the public can’t know this without professional journalists with the courage to report from the centre of the storm. These journalists must be able to stand their ground if police try to move them, and the law must protect their right to do so. Without this, we are on our way to a police state.
Canadians are still processing the Toronto protest. What happened with the $1 billion the federal government is spending on security? Are the people of Ontario going to put up with the Public Works Protection Act, implemented quietly for the G-20? Will they accept the principle that the police can declare any protest or demonstration an illegal assembly? Will they demand full accountability from politicians and the police?
If the protest marked a turning point for the city, then it also marked a turning point for the world. If the Toronto G-20 is the shape of things to come, then people faced with drastic reductions in their living standards will be denied their freedom of speech and assembly at the snap of a police officer’s or politician’s fingers.
The firing of those rubber bullets should be a shot heard round the world.
You can watch a collection of G-20 video reports, including “Doves on finance reform, hawks on austerity”[5] with Rob Johnson, at the Real News Network.[6]
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc [2]
http://bit.ly/cWrDsA [3]
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/journalist_describes_being_beaten_arrested_by [4]
http://bit.ly/accJUc [5]
http://bit.ly/dccOro [6]
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=395
Paul Jay (repost)
Homepage:
http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/07/14/the-g20-plan-for-prosperity-rubber-bullets-and-shredded-social-safety-net-14979/
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
what?
14.07.2010 20:10
lets just get some basics off the ground,
- every 'blac bloc' demo on the 'international summit stage' has been infiltrated by pigs, its old news,get over it. they dont just do it to make us look bad - which we dont care about anyway, its a war, not a debate - they do it to try and identify 'ring leaders' for snatch squads, which were out and about in toronto, particularly after the main 'offensive' by the Blac Bloc, and they do it to justify their own, state sponsored, tax payer paid for, copviolence...
- there is also footage of police fleeing, not abandoning, but running away from, veichles being attacked, that is a fact, findable if you look hard enough, they were fucking scared of the blac bloc, couz they're weedy canadian police, never fully understanding the blac bloc style of 'rampage for change', you can see it and hear it when you watch the vids - basically canadian police are wimps...thats why their fucking cars got torched.
- without the millions upon millions in defence and fences, the shitty little summit would've got burned down, thats what the money is spent on, as the police would have been there on the streets and roads even if it was a football game or baseball game or whatever, the streets aren't full of riot police on other occasions just because there was not a billion quid to spend. the police will always appear when crowds gather, its their natural state of play. so the billions protects the ministers as the real crimes are committed behind doors, its nothing to do with the pigs on the streets. by the logic of the numnuts who think other wise, it means that if there had been no billion dollar budget, then blac bloc would have caused loads of damage to the city...oh wait a minute.........thats what did happen, BECAUSE THE BUDGET IS FOR THE SUMMIT, NOT THE PIGS..and some fucker is making profit off it, which is nothing new, i guess...
- there was well over a three hundred blac bloc, not a hundred, as they dont just have to be wearing black clothes, far from it, black just makes it easier to evade capture or identification, they are engaging the enemy on 'blac bloc terms', not on a fashion outing......read the 'BLACK BLOCK PAPERS' for more clues and the truth about the single greatest threat to the elitists world order on this planet today*...........
and thats about it.cheers.
*this is all my fucking opinion, not the opinion of every blac bloccer out there.....
che fucking guavara
usual reformist drivel
14.07.2010 23:35
blakblocker