THE DARING OF THE EDL
D.Dave | 06.07.2010 18:34 | Sheffield
Having (badly sheffield.indymedia.org.uk) advertised a public meeting in Leeds to oppose the EDL, the clueless idiots of The Anarchist Federation didn’t bother to organise any form of security whatsoever. Entirely predictably, the EDL took advantage of the open target and walked into the meeting. The AF have no pedigree whatsoever in terms of antifascism, and in handing the EDL such an easy victory, have shown themselves to be a liability and an embarrassment.
The Leeds branch of the Anarchist Federation have little or no history of antifascist activity. Yet their ambitions to form a new ‘militant antifascist alliance’ to take on the EDL led them to publically announce such a meeting.
Not that they put much effort into advertizing the meeting, and they certainly didn’t invite any of the existing antifascist groups operating in West Yorkshire.
Bearing in mind the nature of the meeting, and the recent record of the EDL in turning up uninvited to anti-EDL meetings, one might have expected a certain amount of security.
As it was, when the meeting was held, on Saturday July 3rd, and despite the AF being tipped off about EDL plans to attend, there was NO SECURITY WHATSOEVER.
This appalling negligence allowed a small group of EDL activists to simply walk into the meeting, from which the Anarchist Federation showed no stomach to evict them. The EDL have not stopped crowing since. In one stupid blunderous move Leeds Anarchist Federation have not only handed the EDL an easy victory, they have undermined the hard work put in by real militant antifascists in Leeds over the past two decades.
You have to hand it to the EDL that they are daring in their tactics in a way that anarchist/leftist groups are not. We could learn from them. At the weekend five EDLers strolled into an Afed organised ‘Stop the EDL’ meeting in Leeds and asked how they were to be stopped. The EDLers didnt know in advance how many anti-fascists would be there or how combative they would be. They’ve done the same to a UAF meeting in Bristol and a George Galloway meeting in Birmingham. As a result wild rumours circulate about the EDL -’fifty EDLers attacked the SWP’s Marxism event at the weekend’ another writes that ‘they were faced down’. Where’s the evidence for this happening outside of some paranoid minds? Where will they appear next?
Their whole marching strategy has some dynamism and coherence to it and they generally pull it off. They post regularly on left/anarchist forums (including here) and allow opponents to post on their own so they are certainly not afraid to debate. On their forum about Leeds they even salute the bravery of ‘ the bloke in the black shirt who had some bottle’. I’m sure if you’re in the EDL it’s exciting not only to march but to catch up on what your new best mates Marshy, Tommo, Snowy and Joel are up to – i’m getting keen myself! Compare good ‘ol Snowy’s occupation of the Dudley Mosque site – which made sense in the EDL strategy- with most of the things anarchists occupy which are nonsense. Before there is an avalanche of posts accusing this of being a closet Nazi – we are talking daring and tactics here.
Stick your head in the sand or wise up comrades. More of the same just aint working.
The Leeds branch of the Anarchist Federation have little or no history of antifascist activity. Yet their ambitions to form a new ‘militant antifascist alliance’ to take on the EDL led them to publically announce such a meeting.
Not that they put much effort into advertizing the meeting, and they certainly didn’t invite any of the existing antifascist groups operating in West Yorkshire.
Bearing in mind the nature of the meeting, and the recent record of the EDL in turning up uninvited to anti-EDL meetings, one might have expected a certain amount of security.
As it was, when the meeting was held, on Saturday July 3rd, and despite the AF being tipped off about EDL plans to attend, there was NO SECURITY WHATSOEVER.
This appalling negligence allowed a small group of EDL activists to simply walk into the meeting, from which the Anarchist Federation showed no stomach to evict them. The EDL have not stopped crowing since. In one stupid blunderous move Leeds Anarchist Federation have not only handed the EDL an easy victory, they have undermined the hard work put in by real militant antifascists in Leeds over the past two decades.
You have to hand it to the EDL that they are daring in their tactics in a way that anarchist/leftist groups are not. We could learn from them. At the weekend five EDLers strolled into an Afed organised ‘Stop the EDL’ meeting in Leeds and asked how they were to be stopped. The EDLers didnt know in advance how many anti-fascists would be there or how combative they would be. They’ve done the same to a UAF meeting in Bristol and a George Galloway meeting in Birmingham. As a result wild rumours circulate about the EDL -’fifty EDLers attacked the SWP’s Marxism event at the weekend’ another writes that ‘they were faced down’. Where’s the evidence for this happening outside of some paranoid minds? Where will they appear next?
Their whole marching strategy has some dynamism and coherence to it and they generally pull it off. They post regularly on left/anarchist forums (including here) and allow opponents to post on their own so they are certainly not afraid to debate. On their forum about Leeds they even salute the bravery of ‘ the bloke in the black shirt who had some bottle’. I’m sure if you’re in the EDL it’s exciting not only to march but to catch up on what your new best mates Marshy, Tommo, Snowy and Joel are up to – i’m getting keen myself! Compare good ‘ol Snowy’s occupation of the Dudley Mosque site – which made sense in the EDL strategy- with most of the things anarchists occupy which are nonsense. Before there is an avalanche of posts accusing this of being a closet Nazi – we are talking daring and tactics here.
Stick your head in the sand or wise up comrades. More of the same just aint working.
D.Dave
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
storm in a teacup?
06.07.2010 18:56
Were the EDL people who showed up hardcore fascists or just from the moderate EDL wing trying to explain they weren't fascists?
anon
EDL on tour and coming to a town near you soon.
06.07.2010 19:14
Here's a definition of fascism from the Cambridge dictionary, see much of the EDL in there?
"a political system based on a very powerful leader, state control and being extremely proud of country and race, and in which political opposition is not allowed"
We're not political, we don't have a powerful leader, we're very much for political opposition (unlike you Frankfurt School Marxists), but yes, we are proud of our country.
You guys that stifle free speech and a difference of opinion are the fascists.
Road_Hog
e-mail: Infidel@EDL.com
Axe to grind?
06.07.2010 19:15
Either you are EDL,
or ex-AFED with a massive chip on your shoulder,
Countrside Anarchist
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments