Blues Budget batters public
Roger Bagley | 22.06.2010 22:19 | Other Press | Sheffield
Launching a horrific "emergency" Budget, Chancellor Osborne charged wildly along his ruinous road, attacking public services, welfare payments, jobs, wages and pensions.
He announced a vicious programme of spending cuts and tax rises to claw back over £110 billion from the people of Britain if the Con-Dem coalition stays in power for five years.
A Treasury spokesman admitted: "This is the biggest fiscal consolidation this country has ever seen in peacetime."
Rail union RMT general secretary Bob Crow warned of "widespread industrial and community resistance" against "this assault on the British people."
Trade Union Co-ordinating Group parliamentary convenor John McDonnell MP also forecast massive resistance.
"People rightly perceive a grotesque unfairness in being forced to pay with cuts in their jobs and services for a crisis caused by the greed of the bankers," said Mr McDonnell.
Mr Osborne said government departments would suffer an average budget cut of 25 per cent over four years.
Spearheading a huge attack on jobs and services, he said spending by government departments would fall a further £17 billion over and above the £44 billion cut already planned by the new Labour government.
More details will be announced in a spending review to be published on October 20.
The multimillionaire Tory wielded his axe to please the financiers and international speculators who are demanding deep cuts plus a free rein for greedy privateers.
Unashamedly he declared: "I want a sign to go up above the British economy which says open for business."
Public-sector net borrowing will fall from a forecast £149 million this year to £20 billion by 2015-16, according to the Tory stooge Office for Budget Responsibility.
VAT will go up from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent from January 4, and welfare benefits will be slashed by £11 billion by 2014-15.
Housing benefit will be cut by £1.8 billion, and tough new medical assessments will be introduced from 2013 for anyone claiming Disability Living Allowance.
Benefits, tax credits and public service pensions will suffer a cut of around £6 billion by the trick of uprating them in line with the generally lower consumer prices index rather than the retail price index.
But corporation tax on companies will be progressively reduced from 28p in the pound to 24p over four years. This compares with 32p under the last Tory government.
Public-sector workers will suffer a two-year pay freeze despite a current 5.1 per cent rise in retail prices and forecasts of continuing price rises.
Suggesting he was making a great concession, Mr Osborne added that 1.7 million public servants who earn less than £21,000 would receive a flat pay rise worth £250 in each of the next two years.
In line with Tory policy the Chancellor declared: "This government will not be joining the euro in this Parliament."
But as a sop to the eurofanatic Lib Dems, Mr Osborne announced a £1,000 increase in the personal tax allowance to £7,475 from next April.
The basic state pension will be re-linked to earnings, with a "triple lock" guaranteeing a rise in line with earnings, prices or a 2.5 per cent increase - whichever is greater.
And a levy on banks and building societies is expected to raise £2 billion.
Roger Bagley
Homepage:
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/91890
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
and your point is?
23.06.2010 00:35
Thats what you get with god knows how many years of Labour running us into a massive debt.
At least they are dealing with it, rather than just running up more debt to keep people happy in the short term. Look at Iceland - they lived way beyond their means for years, and now look at them. Labour had us two steps away from having to hold our hand out to the IMF like some third-world country (oh yeah, thats right --- just like the 70s). Funny how history repeats itself.
No one is looking forward to it but its got to be done. Such is life.
You run up a debt, you got to pay it back by spending less. Not exactly rocket science.
tableman
'...got to be done'
23.06.2010 07:13
You run up a debt, you got to pay it back by spending less. Not exactly rocket science."
tableman'
Has it 'got to be done'? Really? Well sure, if you want to maintain an economic system that most people don't approve of then, yeah, 'its got to be done'. But I don't think anyone in their right might would say that it has to be done in this way, the way that the political-right have always done it, by making the poorest parts of society pay for the follies of the richest.
There are plenty of other ways that this could have been done including ways that the public actually wants like, withdrawing from Afghanistan (£11billion saving right there!), Scrapping Trident (£70+billion)...etc
MB
MB - Notts
Class Warfare
23.06.2010 08:23
Is it just me or are public policies being decided by 'The markets" or "Investors" or 'Credit rating agencies" rather than 'the people" in this supposedly democratic system.
The services now being attacked by the ruling class were fought for and won by the working class through the sacrifices of two world wars.
I didn't notice much deprivation at Ascot or Wimbledon or Henley this year did you?
2%Human
priorities
23.06.2010 10:36
Didn't go to any of them, but I'll take your word for it.
Strange though how in progressive quarters the dominant theme of the election and since has been opposition to the Tories. The small matter of 600-800,000 Iraqi civilians (according to the Lancet) killed in a totally unjustified war, in which New Labour played a leading role seems to have been forgotten.
The Tories were unprincipalled and opportunistic at the time, but New Labour were and are war criminals by every definition of the term.
Still, far less important than how long you have to wait to see your fcking dentist isn't it?
bufton tufton
Just you? (a lot of us wearing ideological blinders)
23.06.2010 10:47
Why are you saying "supposedly democratic"? Because "the people" aren't voting according to how YOU (well a lot of us) imagine that they should vote. Democracy (when working properly) isn;'t about coming up with good, wise, just, etc. decisions but just the decisions that "the people' want for good or ill.
Now WHY do they persist in supporting a system in your (our) eyese so much not to their won financial benefit? Instead of assuming this represents a failure of the democratic system be willing to honestly face reality.
1) People do commonly do things that by rational measure not to their finanical interests like buy lottery tickets. That's not all that much different than supporting a system that has these favored places on top even though their chances of occupying one of those slots miniscule.
2) People don't trust us of the left to be any better if we were in charge. They aren't interested in working for a change in masters.
3) We are NOT presenting a clear, attractive picture of an alternative, a believable alternative. Yes of course, each of our little splinter groups may have such a vision but collectively we do not. Our "alternatives" at variance with each other and it is this muddy picture that "the people" sees.
The failure isn't with "democracy". The failure is within ourselves. We have to do better.
MDN