Skip to content or view screen version

May 15th 2010: Mass Action for Freedom of Movement

No Borderer | 20.04.2010 17:39 | Migration | Repression | World

There's now just under a month to go before the Paris Day of Action for Freedom of Movement!
...Have a read of this mini-update & book your travel now...

May 15th, 2010
May 15th, 2010


The mobilisation on 15th has grown in part out the ongoing solidarity work of some No Borders activists in Calais. Recognising that there has been no adequate political response to the destruction of the 'jungles', & the ongoing repression there, we realised that we need not only to be responding to the immediate violence, but building a wider network of resistance & making it known that European citizens will not accept the continued persecution of those seeking a better life here.
Migration controls are a global scourge; our resistance can only be transnational.

We've now set up an English language blog, where we're posting info on travel, the legal situation and other practical info:

 http://parisactionday.wordpress.com/

We will soon announce the breakdown of the day's events, including the main target for action, but feel free to be forming affinity groups & get busy plotting in the meantime...

------------------------------------------------------------

Reminder of the (translated) callout:

- DAY OF ACTION FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT -

15th May 2010, Paris

(Meeting point: Jaurès Metro Station, Line 2, @ 2pm)

----------> Barriers to freedom of movement are on the rise

These days, it's not just migrants and sans-papiers who are being stopped and questioned by the authorities, but precarious workers, and stigmatised youth alike; all are being forced to undergo checks on identity and travel documents on the basis of their physical appearance.

----------> Spread the word & be vigilant...

Governments seek to legitimise the increasing control and surveillance of the social sphere each day via an expanding toolbox of security legislation.
It is by this mechanism that the denunciation of men, women and children without legal immigration status is encouraged: in the civil service, in the banks, and even in the workplace. Female sans-papiers are further at risk: the reality is that a complaint about acts of violence or rape promptly translates to detention and deportation.
The unemployed and precarious are monitored, criminalised and penalised; communities are divided, people are arrested in schools, those who commit the French so-called 'Crime of Solidarity' are punished, and communities who resist are ultimately vilified.

----------> Time to resist European 'migration management'

Following a journey lasting many months, the migrants in Calais seeking entry to the UK are harassed, chased, or deported in a relentless routine. The destruction of the 'Jungle' in Calais, and the systematic closure of all avenues of solidarity by an inhumane police force, has forced the migrants onto the streets, exposing them to yet more persecution.
In the European policy of 'migration management', borders mean watchtowers and barbed wire, and migrants are reduced to mere quotas. To realise their objectives, the European Agency, Frontex - armed and in possession of considerable powers - executes a merciless hunt of migrants in maritime, aerial and terrestrial areas. This only forces people to seek alternative and inevitably more fatal access routes (1,508 deaths at the EU border were recorded in 2008 alone).

Freedom of movement is prohibited and violently repressed for exiles fleeing war, corruption and misery: all accesses to Europe are denied. The right to housing, to work, to a decent existence for those who want to rebuild their lives or rejoin family in Europe, are made a mockery of by oppressive European legislation:

- The Dublin II Regulation allows for the systematic removal of an asylum-seeker to the first country of entry, where their fingerprints were recorded (known as the 'EURODAC' database). This is why Greece, a principal entry point of Europe, in contravention of the European Convention of Human Rights, takes in just 0.03% of asylum seekers.
- The European Return Directive 'harmonises' the duration of immigration detention across Europe, expressly permitting detention for to up to 18 months (with the exception of the UK which opted out and allows for near indefinite detention).
- Meanwhile, the new Stockholm Programme, negotiated by the 27 Ministers of the Interior, will harden existing measures. Under the pretext of the War on Terror, EU nations are choreographing our descent into greater repression and social control.

---------->The guilty parties

When the fight against immigration becomes a business, deportation, detention, and the rest of the security architecture becomes the source of (major) profit. Men and women build the detention centres that imprison them, clean the stations and trains in which they are monitored and arrested. They are reduced to a mere workforce, one which can be picked up and discarded without mercy....

BECAUSE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT IS THREATENED BY THE VERY EXISTENCE OF BORDERS.

NO BORDERS REJECTS AND INTENDS TO FIGHT THE PRISON-LIKE, PROFIT-DRIVEN EUROPE WHICH TRAMPLES ON OUR FREEDOM TO MIGRATE AND TO SETTLE.

FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND SETTLEMENT FOR ALL!!!

ON SATURDAY 15TH MAY 2010, WE CALL ON EVERYONE TO PARTICIPATE IN A DAY OF MASS ACTION AGAINST POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, INSTITUTIONAL AND IDEOLOGICAL ACTORS WHO CONCEAL THEIR PROFITS BEHIND A SECURITISED AND REPRESSIVE EUROPE.

NO BORDERS! NO NATIONS!

ALL INFORMATION & UPDATES ON:  http://parisactionday.wordpress.com/
 noborderparis@riseup.net


No Borderer
- e-mail: noborder at riseup.net
- Homepage: http://parisactionday.wordpress.com/

Comments

Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

freedom of movement or all power to communities?

20.04.2010 19:51

while i like on some levels the idea of free movement, it is a theoretical and practical nonsense. you do not let anyone just move into your house do you? or come to your party for free? Freedom of movement puts the rights of individuals above that of communities. It is liberalism. It should be up to communities to decide who lives where, as much as individuals deciding where they want to live. Yet I do not see NO Borders arguing that communities should have a right to veto people mving unwanted into their communities.

communist


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

@ communist

20.04.2010 22:34

Don't be daft. Youre using a flimsy straw man argument there. It's quite obviously not like saying 'let anyone just move into your house'. What we're talking about is the absurdity of (illegitimate) nation-states dictating who has the right to a safer and more secure existence.

We are living in a world carved up into nations, an indivisible characteristic of which is large-scale conflict, repression of minorities and dissidents etc etc. ie; more migration. We have to accept and respond to that reality, show solidarity with some of the hardest-hit casualties of capitalism & authoritarian rule, not base our actions on the theoretical notion that 'communities' (what are you referring to here? What communities?!) are the decision-makers.

Ultimately, the freedom to seek a better or safer life is inalienable.

How would you like to enforce it? What if people are so determined and desperate that they will ignore your 'veto'? Would you be be willing to resort to lethal barriers? How does your community decide who is 'deserving' enough? When it comes down to individuals, how can you pick and choose?



anarchist
mail e-mail: -
- Homepage: http://-


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Wake up!

20.04.2010 22:52

People are dying - with 14,921 reported deaths at the borders of the EU since 1988 according to this site:  http://fortresseurope.blogspot.com/2006/02/immigrants-dead-at-frontiers-of-europe_16.html

...borders continue to wreck peoples' lives and cause immeasurable suffering.

Likening it to 'coming to your party for free' is utterly trivialising the issue. Purely by chance of birth, the vast majority of EU citizens will never have a problem travelling about the continent, are absolutely clueless about the misery experienced here by so many of those without citizenship, and in fact need never know what its like to be in that position. Time to wake up!

anon


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

i think communist might be batting for the other side

21.04.2010 12:56

so to speak ; )

feral class (working division)


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Communist.....

22.04.2010 13:34

Congratulations on posting the most idiotic, unfactual, politically naive comment that I have ever seen on Indymedia.

Are you a 13 year old beret wearing, Che worshipping, pimpled little goon by any chance?

I bet you are......

Cj


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

enagage in debate please

22.04.2010 14:38

BECAUSE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT IS THREATENED BY THE VERY EXISTENCE OF BORDERS. ......

wot like the sea? some of you're arguments seem tabloid simplicity - redctio ad adsurdum , some seem pro liberal capitalist , you have others arguing for land rights for 'special cases' but not in this land of the dispossessed . Borders can also be geo-physical. This country has no apparent borders to the rich and the international bourgoisie. Natrion states are subsumed to trans national corporations i.e corporations without borders...

it also costs to move. are you saying that people cannot fight for land and independence from the state, are you arguing for people to come and support the centre of capitalism? you wanrt people to be alwasys on the move- how sustaianble is that? how can you grow anything? you need to clarify exactly what you are saying - not shout and use 'non-argument' abuse - there appears are very real reluctance to genuinely engage with anybody outside your small sphere of politcos.

quarantine


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

no debates?

22.04.2010 20:35

It is a bit striking how anyone who tries to talk practicalities with No Borders sympathizers immediately gets accused of being worse than the Nazis. This is not the case with other campaigns, and you may wonder if this sensitivity is not down to a fear that they are actually campaigning in a completely utopian cause.
So just to clarify - could someone explain what would actually happen if an extremely rich country (or region) like ours did abolish its frontiers, when we're completely surrounded by abject poverty?
Would many people make the most of this change, and if so what would happen?
I'm sure you've thought it all through - havent you?

staph


Mass Action Target: Gare du Nord

27.04.2010 19:47

No Borderer


Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments