Skip to content or view screen version

Farnborough Airport breaches no fly ban

Keith Parkins | 19.04.2010 13:14 | Climate Chaos | Ecology | Technology | World

Profit comes before people and planet.

There is in place in the UK and across northern Europe a no fly zone due to the dust from the eruption of Eyjafjallajoekull in Iceland.

 http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/uk-airspace-closed/

Farnborough Airport, a business airport southwest of London, has twice breached the no fly ban putting passengers and crew and those on the ground at risk.

- Mid-morning (around 1030 BST) Friday 16 April 2010 aircraft takes off in an easterly direction from Farnborough Airport

- 1022 Monday 19 April 2010 aircraft takes off in an easterly direction from Farnborough Airport

Profit before people and planet. Business aviation with its low occupancy is one of the most obscene forms of transport.

Farnborough Airport has had an application to double its number of flights rejected. An appeal is due to go before a Planning Inquiry in May. Meanwhile local residents are enjoying unaccustomed peace and quiet.

Also see

Farnborough Airport to double the number of flights?
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/07/434470.html?c=on

Misappropriation of Farnborough Airport environment levy
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/08/436044.html

Stop Farnborough Airport Expansion
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/09/438822.html

Expansion of Farnborough Airport rejected!
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/11/441621.html?c=on

UK airspace closed!
 http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/uk-airspace-closed/

Gaia strikes back
 http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/gaia-strikes-back/

Keith Parkins

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Not banned

19.04.2010 13:38

Aircraft are still allowed to fly, they're just not allowed to operate commercial public flights to fee paying customers. Most of the big airlines have been running test flights without passengers on board to check safety this is perfectly acceptable.

Also the ban doesn't apply to privately owned planes or private corporate flights. My neighbours owns a small light aircraft and has been flying it over the weekend without any problems.

The Flights


Corrections to 'Not banned'

19.04.2010 19:29

"Aircraft are still allowed to fly, they're just not allowed to operate commercial public flights to fee paying customers. Most of the big airlines have been running test flights without passengers on board to check safety this is perfectly acceptable."

I have found no evidence that this is true. The latest CAA update states that they are overseeing the test flights, and one took place on Sunday between Heathrow and Cardiff using a Boeing 747. It would not make sense for all the 'big airlines' to run their own flight tests thus exposing their pilots to unnecessary risk when there is an aviation authority doing it for them.

 http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?catid=14&pagetype=65&appid=7&mode=detail&nid=1861


"Also the ban doesn't apply to privately owned planes or private corporate flights. My neighbours owns a small light aircraft and has been flying it over the weekend without any problems."

This is inaccurate. The restrictions (it has not been referred to as a ban) are for all aircraft with jet engines regardless of ownership. Propeller driven planes are not affected by volcanic ash so are not restricted. Many privately owned planes are are propeller driven.

A