Skip to content or view screen version

A Very ‘Moderate’ Murder Plot

Barnsley-Bill | 04.04.2010 19:10 | Sheffield

The BNP like to portray themselves as a ‘moderate’ political party that has left it’s violent street-fighting roots in the past. But it seems that 29 yr old Sheffield Brightside candidate, Mark Collett, hasn’t quite got the message.

Key BNP members have been summoned to a meeting tomorrow to discuss “urgent organisational matters” after BNP leader Prick Gri££in and his vile colleagues made statements to the police which resulted in Collett being detained by Humberside police on Thursday.

Collet, the BNP’s ‘publicity director’, has been released on bail pending further inquiries, but it is understood that the BNP have suggested that Mr Collett was plotting to kill Nick Gri££in – Griffin and Terreblanche in one week, wouldn’t that have been news worth celebrating?

With politicians being absolute back-stabbing scumbags, and right-wing politicians being the worst of all, we shouldn’t really be surprised to find that there’s a lot more to these allegations than meets the eye. We don’t doubt that a nazi like Collett is capable of murder, but the whole incident seems to have been kick- started by rumours of “alleged financial irregularities”. Didn’t a poor disillusioned nutter like Collett realise that the BNP exists solely to line Prick Gri££in’s pockets? Did he turn against his fuhrer – like Tom Cruise in Valkyrie – when he realised the truth? Or was it Collett who was caught with his fingers in the fascist-piggy bank?

We’ll probably never know, and to be honest we really don’t care. Though it’s interesting to see that the BNP really have become more like the usual mainstream political parties – i.e. they’re a bunch of greedy, devious, self-serving, corrupt bastards, just like everyone else in Westminster

Barnsley-Bill

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

in your opinion

04.04.2010 19:55

stop watching tv and trying to fantasise

Ahmed


misdirection

04.04.2010 23:11

Tom Cruise in Valkyrie was a true event, so it would be better to refer to Colonel von Stauffenberg.

But, the boring bits aside, what real question is what is your motivation? There is an underlying tone of distraction about this article to inform us that 'We’ll probably never know, and to be honest we really don’t care'

Why try to instruct people not to care? What are you hiding?

anon


Its all true

05.04.2010 11:50

couldnt make it up want an April fool Collette, Griffolump the missing money and the pathetic assasination

these losers are the nations saving grace? more like a bad farce

Colly wobbler


Don't understand

06.04.2010 14:29

I don't understand the true thrust of your story. Why is Griffin referred to as 'Gri££in'? If he was interested in money, as an Oxbridge graduate, joining an extreme political party with no supporters doesn't seem to be the best route. Indeed, with his qualifications he could easily have gone straight into the City and earned a fortune (or joined a mainstream party for that matter and been equally well rewarded).

Also, why are right wing politicians the 'worst of all' when it comes to corruption'? There are plenty of left and right systems from democracies to totalitarian regimes that all exhibit clear examples of corruption so why do you say that the right is particularly worse?

However, even you note that, 'We’ll probably never know, and to be honest we really don’t care'. Under such circumstances don't you think you should keep your ill-informed and poorly researched opinions to yourself?

Polly Pecker