The Battle Against the Fur Trade - The Next Year Is Crucial
British Fur Trade Association | 31.03.2010 13:20 | Animal Liberation
The battle against the fur trade in the UK is on the verge of victory, but in this industry where are the weak points and where is our focus best made effective?
The battle against the fur trade in the UK is on the verge of victory, but in this industry where are the weak points and where is our focus best made effective?
Every year, the fur industry seems to market its products in a different way; we have seen over the past few years an increase in the sale of trimmed and dyded items in an attempt to distance from the horrific image associated with the full-length garnments condemned by animal rights actions in the 1980's. However, the fur industry has still not yet recovered from those such campaigns twenty years on, with actions continuing against such outlets for trimmed fur goods on a national level and every single department store refusing to stock fur goods, with the exception of Harrods. The straw is close to breaking the camels back, it would seem.
A number of top London furriers, responsible for supplying animal pelts nationwide have admitted that business is poor, however the new means of getting fur back on the high street is through the vintage image, through the false depiction of these items somehow being less cruel due to, upon first glance, being second hand and tied in with 'saving the planet' by re-using second hand items that may have, at one point been destined for the rubbish tip or a dusty attic. However, those same furriers also admitted that there is no such thing as 'vintage fur' and it is merely a marketing concept aimed at reforming the UK fur trade, something for which which the next year it crucial. To put it simply, vintage fur is not old fashioned, but merely based on the style of the clothing opposed to the age and has been documented to be imported from East European countries, China and the USA for sale on the United Kingdom market. If this marketing ploy falls through, so does the industry.
The London furriers send their items to vintage shops and sales nationwide, however gain most of their custom through four outlets without one of which, let alone two or three, this strategy for selling fur would be rendered useless on a national level. Again, if one of these furriers were to go into administration, it would also hinder the industry in the UK on a great scale, however they are not as weak as their external outlets in terms of campaigning as they rely upon other 'hardened' fur sellers, but vintage is their weakpoint. It is most certainly the case that the 'vintage' fur trade is propping up that involved in the sale in bespoke items, such as Joseph, Harrods and others as they both source items from the same furriers. Vintage fur is keeping these furriers afloat, so if they were to close down it would have a large knock-on effect on Joseph, Harrods and others.
So, where are these four key 'battlegrounds' key in the national fight against the vintage fur trade in the UK? Brick Lane, Portobello Road, Petticoat Lane and The Stables Market in Camden; all of which are supplied by London's main furriers and are crucial to their existance.
Details of a new national campaign are to be launched in the coming weeks, so keep your eyes peeled and get involved. Please also keep your focus aimed on your local vintage fur outlets and remember - take out vintage fur, take out the fur trade. It's a simple as that!
Every year, the fur industry seems to market its products in a different way; we have seen over the past few years an increase in the sale of trimmed and dyded items in an attempt to distance from the horrific image associated with the full-length garnments condemned by animal rights actions in the 1980's. However, the fur industry has still not yet recovered from those such campaigns twenty years on, with actions continuing against such outlets for trimmed fur goods on a national level and every single department store refusing to stock fur goods, with the exception of Harrods. The straw is close to breaking the camels back, it would seem.
A number of top London furriers, responsible for supplying animal pelts nationwide have admitted that business is poor, however the new means of getting fur back on the high street is through the vintage image, through the false depiction of these items somehow being less cruel due to, upon first glance, being second hand and tied in with 'saving the planet' by re-using second hand items that may have, at one point been destined for the rubbish tip or a dusty attic. However, those same furriers also admitted that there is no such thing as 'vintage fur' and it is merely a marketing concept aimed at reforming the UK fur trade, something for which which the next year it crucial. To put it simply, vintage fur is not old fashioned, but merely based on the style of the clothing opposed to the age and has been documented to be imported from East European countries, China and the USA for sale on the United Kingdom market. If this marketing ploy falls through, so does the industry.
The London furriers send their items to vintage shops and sales nationwide, however gain most of their custom through four outlets without one of which, let alone two or three, this strategy for selling fur would be rendered useless on a national level. Again, if one of these furriers were to go into administration, it would also hinder the industry in the UK on a great scale, however they are not as weak as their external outlets in terms of campaigning as they rely upon other 'hardened' fur sellers, but vintage is their weakpoint. It is most certainly the case that the 'vintage' fur trade is propping up that involved in the sale in bespoke items, such as Joseph, Harrods and others as they both source items from the same furriers. Vintage fur is keeping these furriers afloat, so if they were to close down it would have a large knock-on effect on Joseph, Harrods and others.
So, where are these four key 'battlegrounds' key in the national fight against the vintage fur trade in the UK? Brick Lane, Portobello Road, Petticoat Lane and The Stables Market in Camden; all of which are supplied by London's main furriers and are crucial to their existance.
Details of a new national campaign are to be launched in the coming weeks, so keep your eyes peeled and get involved. Please also keep your focus aimed on your local vintage fur outlets and remember - take out vintage fur, take out the fur trade. It's a simple as that!
British Fur Trade Association
Homepage:
http://www.caft.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
On the verge of victory?
31.03.2010 14:39
Ebays UK site is packed full of products containing real fur literally thousands of items on there, there's online UK outlets selling real fur too.
Please don't proclaim that you're on the verge of victory when you and I know full well that production simply moved abroad to China and sales have simply shifted online instead of in the high street. It makes the animal rights movement look foolish proclaiming false victories.
Cynical
vintage?
31.03.2010 14:41
jo blogs
Ideas
31.03.2010 16:02
Fur is still advertised in fashion magazines: If we could campaign against these magazines, and get them to adopt fur free policies, then people aren't going to see the advertising and less people will wear fur (and that would include vintage). Also, companies selling fur are less likely to stock it and feature it in their collections if they can't advertise it anywhere.
Also, speaking with universities, schools and colleges, so that all these new upcoming designers aren't using fur in their designs and that they are being taught that real fur is not the "done thing" anymore and that these young people are taught about alternatives. This ensures future generations aren't designing with fur.
I think we do need to campaign against this vintage fur, but I think attacking the problem from many angles would be more effective. The designers; the advertisers; and those who are responsible for importing and distributing it; those selling it; fashion shows etc etc.
Also if the campaign against fur widened to this kind of targeting, there will be more people who could help with campaigning. Many local a/r groups don't have fur in shops in their area, but maybe they live near the ports importing it, maybe they live near distributers, or magazine companies, or maybe they live near a university with fashion courses.
Fur Hater
I agree with the top and last comment
31.03.2010 20:49
Alot of glossies are advertising fur...contact them and ask them to stop advertising real fur.
I agree with the top and last comments,.
Save humans first
31.03.2010 22:18
If we can't save vulnerable humans then what's the point of trying to save any other species?
x
Ed
Ed's right, so are the rest. [Jo blogs you're troll.]
01.04.2010 00:19
When the fighting in the Congo, Liberia, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Palestine, Israel, Sri Lanka etc is over then ya yippididee doo all the world will be vegan.
It's the attitude that only being vegan matters that makes AR extreme. The whole movement is incestous. Only vegans are permitted on anti vivisection demos, fur demos etc. [Anyone who disputes this is a liar.]
When one of the campaigners for example meets a new partner they will be asked "Is he/she vegan?" and nothing else matters. Everything they do is checked out by the others to the point of obsession and pettiness. This is what makes them extreme and causes extremism...this closed off group of people who are in some sort of secret club. That's where in a way it stops even being about the animals and everyone is under suspicion of being "the cops" and the aura of illegality hangs in the air. Most average people leave "the movement".
As for the fur campaign, it's f***ed. The fur campaign is winnable but has never really been won. Fur is a fashion item and frivolous..it's easier to win that the vivisection campaigns etc but there is so much fur everywhere. PETA have been the most successful fur campaigners but are slated by "real" AR activists who are just one group. Maybe people should help PETA fur efforts?
Go to the fashion magazines, the fashion houses and the model agencies. Obvious. Sitting outside shops waving a placard will do little unless you tackle where fur is being made to seem desirbale and fashionable, the fashion industry. Why has this never been done?
What AR needs to do too is look outside the box and "the movement". You are but a GROUP, you are not "the movement". There are other AR groups and they are just as valid as yours. Support PETA and Viva! fur campaigns, go to the fashion houses and magazines and maybe you will really get rid of fur.
anon
People have been saying all this for years. Approach the fashion industry.
02.04.2010 01:21
anon
animals feel pain, dont need to be human to suffer
03.04.2010 23:41
have you watched the video footage of animals being skinned alive? please watch that, please an then decide if those animals dont deserve someone to trying to help them.
blah
the fur battle is effectively won, leather is the new battle
06.04.2010 20:35
The focus has shifted to leather and veganism in general, as people are realising there isn't really much difference between fur and leather in terms of cruelty. Choice of vegan footwear is massive compared to just a decade or two ago. The past was people feeling good about not wearing fur but still eating meat and wearing leather. Now more people are seeing the contradictions, and the bigger picture.
It's still good to keep pressure on the odd bods who still persist with fur though.
vegan