Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab - Environment Disaster public meeting in Camden
Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab [Mandy Ford] | 02.02.2010 16:09 | Climate Chaos | Ecology | Health | South Coast | World
There are plans to build a high level [3] virus containment facility in Kings Cross, Camden alongside St Pancras International behind the British Libary close to an environmentally protected area, Camley Conservation Area. There is a "last chance" public development forum where the public can ask questions & speak out against the lab. Wednesday Feb 10th 2009 6.30-8.30pm.
The UKCMRI lab plans will be discussed at a public meeting in St Mary and St Pancras Primary School 45 - 47 Polygon Road Camden London NW1 1SR.
The lab poses an environmental disaster. Foot and Mouth disease was leaked from a govt facility Pirbright in Surrey. Such a leak in central London would be catastrophe especially so close to the Channel Tunnel.
Get down to the meeting and have your say to protect the environment!
07981111602
stopcamdeanimallab@yahoo.co.uk
www.myspace.com/stopcamdenanimallab
See also Camden Green Party for excellent, up to date and detailed information for Camden Green Party's Nathalie Bennet which is one of the best info sites about the lab on the internet.
Mandy Ford - Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab
The lab poses an environmental disaster. Foot and Mouth disease was leaked from a govt facility Pirbright in Surrey. Such a leak in central London would be catastrophe especially so close to the Channel Tunnel.
Get down to the meeting and have your say to protect the environment!
07981111602
stopcamdeanimallab@yahoo.co.uk
www.myspace.com/stopcamdenanimallab
See also Camden Green Party for excellent, up to date and detailed information for Camden Green Party's Nathalie Bennet which is one of the best info sites about the lab on the internet.
Mandy Ford - Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab
Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab [Mandy Ford]
e-mail:
stopcamdenanimallab@yahoo.co.uk
Homepage:
http://www.myspace.com
Comments
Hide the following 11 comments
Won't win on location - this is an AR issue
02.02.2010 19:01
Currently, all of the UK's ten CL4 facilities are located in the south of England, although CL3 facilities are widely distributed.[167] Some CL4 facilities, such as IAH Pirbright and the laboratories at Porton Down, are situated in relatively isolated locations but this is not the case for all. A number of CL4 laboratories exist in large cities around the world, including three in London which have been in operation for some time.
There are already labs in London that 'contain' a higher level - this is an AR issue campaign on that platform or if you can't let somebody else do so.
AR type
Homepage: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmdius/360/36007.htm
But what if....
02.02.2010 20:55
Not everything has a sinister side. Perhaps over cautious, but not the disaster predicted.
''Foot and Mouth disease was leaked from a govt facility Pirbright in Surrey'' - this is just a theory, right? Shouldn't you state that? Whether you 'believe' it or not?
Everytime the government does do something truly in need of question, it's over reactionary groups like yourselves who make it more difficult to fight.
St Pancreas is an International 'port' now, like it or not. There needs to be a facility there to deal with 'outbreaks'.
Please...
Infected
Level 3 and Level 4
03.02.2010 13:11
I've repeatedly pointed out the naivety of panicking about a new level 3 or level 4 facility in that part of London. What - you think that there aren't some a few minutes' walk from the site already? Have you not noticed how much scientific and medical research goes on in Bloomsbury, one of the capital's main research centres? Jeesh.
"But they might have weird tropical diseases! There could be an outbreak!" Really? Better tell the London School of Tropical Diseases over on Malet Street. (It was particularly funny when the campaigners tried to turn this into a class issue, saying such a lab would never be built in a posh area. Yeah - cause Bloomsbury, just across the Euston Road, is such a poor working class neighbourhood ...)
The old run-down labs in different parts of the UK may be cause for concern. But it seems misguided to worry about a new, all mod-cons one, and just smacks of NIMBY-ism.
Getting into bed with the AR brigade would also seem dumb, given some of the daft claims they made - later disproved - about how the centre would have lots of primates and so on.
And anyone who thinks that a terrorist bomb could unleash a virus from a lab should go and sit with the homeopathy brigade in bad science corner.
Norvello
This is a well written argument and this affects everyone in Britian and Ireland
03.02.2010 13:53
This IS an environment issue, like it or not and we don't want the lab here in Islington or next door Camden.
Pat [Islington / Dublin]
Er, Pat..
03.02.2010 14:14
You say I'm "completely wrong". I pointed out that older level 3 facilities, and facilities handling dangerous tropical diseases already exist a few minutes walk away from the site. In what way is that not correct?
http://www.rae.ac.uk/submissions/ra5a.aspx?id=3&type=uoa&subid=2277
Secondly, I don't recall ever posting anything on here on the subject of northern Ireland. Maybe my memory's going, so I'd love to know what you're on about.
Norvello
Re : "this is only an AR issue" what stupid thing to say!
03.02.2010 15:46
Oh and foot and mouth disease was leaked from a lab...
anon
Pirbright is an argument for a new lab
03.02.2010 18:17
Given that the first poster's main argument was that the campaigners should switch to being AR activists - and I argued that that would be really stupid - your intuition seems out.
There is nothing "personal" about this. When politicians and the press scaremonger, Indymedia contributors rightly point out what they are doing. Why can't it be pointed out when campaigners scaremonger (like all this "It'll be like 28 Days..." stuff)? And why can't some people think that a lab that could help the fight against cancer, and illnesses such as malaria which kill thousands of people in the developing world, is a more positive development for the world than a NIMBY campaign.
"Yes - but MI5 says it's a danger". Oh right - according to an article in the Evening Standard two years ago which said it understood that spies were concerned of the risks if the lab studied stuff like ebola... which it is now very clear it won't. Not even a vague attribution for the MI5 claim, incidentally, no mention of which ministers in which department they warned. The story was weak enough not to be followed up by any national papers (which usually love a good scare story about viruses and spies). It's so weak that the scientists setting up their lab flatly say on their website's Q&A that it's untrue that ministers were warned (a risky strategy, if the scientists are lying, as one little Freedom of Information request from a campaigner could show them up - why not try it?). It's also funny that the strongest anti-lab quotes in the Evening Standard piece came from an MP who then got caught out for a massive pile of dodgy expense claims. But, hey, let's trust him.
As for Pirbright - yes, it's really scary that there are level 3 labs in the UK that are that old and delipidated; scientists have been warning about problems like that for years ("shabby" Pirbright finally won funding last year for a massive rebuild, arguably too late). But that's all an argument for getting the researchers into a decent modern one, rather than leaving them in one of the older ones that are already there, a stone's throw from King's Cross.
Norvello
I'm with the Green Party on this one - it should stay at Mill Hill
03.02.2010 18:53
They are not AR activists or NIMBYS.
As for the stuff about MI5, they did go to the Evening Standard and are such a porweful entity that they would have gone to the major newspapers themselves to say "we didn't say it" if they didn't but they did.
It its not just Ebola that poses a problem. Bird Flu, anthrax, rabies all pose a threat and the prospect of having something like this so close to the Channel Tunnel is agodd reason for NIMBYism when it comes to the staff at St Pancras International who do not want this lab near to the station and who can blame them?
I agree that the first post looks like personal rant but that isn't an issue for me to take up, I am against the lab for all sorts of reasons and the site should be used for badly needed housing.
The head of the NIMR went to the Camden New Journal to speak out against the UKCMRI project, a local pharmaicist has said it's dangerous and belives there has been a cover up over the lab, these people work for the industry and are not against research but they are against the lab. Your "what about cancer" argument has not convinced them.
anon
Re : "This is an AR issus, campaign on that platform or if you cant' "
04.02.2010 12:10
This ISN'T simply an AR issue and people who eat / sell meat or work in the labs have a right to speak out against the lab if they so wish.
We believe that the person who wrote the first post is a thug who has threatened Camden residents and activists in regard to this lab while posing as such himself but residents continue to campaign...whatever their views on animals. Well done to each of the people who continue to campaign.
Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab [Mandy Ford]
We do of course have veggie people who want to speak out against lab
05.02.2010 15:39
Stop Camden Bio Hazard and Animal Lab [Mandy Ford]
Not an AR issue?
19.04.2010 14:51
If you really care about Camden and its community you wouldnt encourage AR activiists in to our community. Oh yes I am a Camden resident and I live in Somers Town just over the road from the site. You would do so much better telling the truth rather than making wild unsubstantive statements. I have been to 4 public exhibitions by UKCMRI. I don't want them, I dont want some hugh building over shadowing my house but the one thing I now understand is that if you stand there, behave rationally, be truthful, and believe in what you are saying you come out far better than those making wild stupid and obviously alarmist statements. Oh but of course when they do it that is considered patronising.
I will object when the application is made, but for real community reasons. To Mandy and her team, take the moral high ground, be truthful stop being alarmist because for as long as you do the valuable points that you are trying to make will be ridiculed, by your own behaviours. Take the high ground, be truthful, balance the real facts. I believe in what UKCMRI proposes. I think it is a great thuing that these people want to focus on these key illnesses, illnesses that kill people in our community every week. But I believe that here is not the right place. I think teh building is over development of a small site. I beleive that the site could be better used buit lets also accept that even if we get housing here we, the community, and our children wont get it. The councils housing policy means that it will be assylum seekers long before our families.
Wendy