BBC & Israel undermine archeology
Don't dig it | 26.01.2010 16:47 | Other Press | Palestine
The BBC described this artefact as "found in the Judean desert".
That is like saying something found in Nazi Germany was "found in the Teutonic desert". They are repeating racially biased propaganda from the Israeli state archaeology swindle.
That is like saying something found in Nazi Germany was "found in the Teutonic desert". They are repeating racially biased propaganda from the Israeli state archaeology swindle.
References:
Islamic-era skeletons 'disappeared' from Elad-sponsored dig
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/988803.html
King David Recruited to Expel Palestinians
When Archaeology Becomes a Curse
By JONATHAN COOK
http://www.counterpunch.org/cook09262008.html
The Politics of Archaeology in East Jerusalem
Digging for Trouble
By YIGAL BRONNER and NEVE GORDON
http://www.counterpunch.org/bronner04112008.html
Jerusalem orders Palestinian homes to be razed
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jun/04/israel
Jerusalem's city council has ordered one of the largest mass demolitions in the city's recent history, with plans to raze the homes of about 1,000 Palestinians in a neighbourhood claimed by Jewish settlers.
The council says about 90 buildings served with demolition orders were built illegally over the last three decades on a site of religious and archaeological value just outside the Old City walls, and that they are being destroyed to restore the area as a national park.
Islamic-era skeletons 'disappeared' from Elad-sponsored dig
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/988803.html
King David Recruited to Expel Palestinians
When Archaeology Becomes a Curse
By JONATHAN COOK
http://www.counterpunch.org/cook09262008.html
The Politics of Archaeology in East Jerusalem
Digging for Trouble
By YIGAL BRONNER and NEVE GORDON
http://www.counterpunch.org/bronner04112008.html
Jerusalem orders Palestinian homes to be razed
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jun/04/israel
Jerusalem's city council has ordered one of the largest mass demolitions in the city's recent history, with plans to raze the homes of about 1,000 Palestinians in a neighbourhood claimed by Jewish settlers.
The council says about 90 buildings served with demolition orders were built illegally over the last three decades on a site of religious and archaeological value just outside the Old City walls, and that they are being destroyed to restore the area as a national park.
Don't dig it
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
Are you sure this is a racist slight?
26.01.2010 18:13
Jericho has been in existence since about 11,000BC and the original Israelites were around at some point after that for quite a long time.
anon
rubbish!
26.01.2010 19:39
someone
more
27.01.2010 00:10
You need only go to the "Israel Map", on Israeli Ministry of Tourism's official website, to see the Golan Heights and the West Bank depicted as part of Israel (the latter being labelled "Judean Desert" and "Shomron" [Samaria], while the Palestinian city of Nablus is given only the Hebrew name "Shechem").
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article501.shtml
Map of West Bank (2006):
http://stopthewall.org/maps/1159.shtml
Ain Sakhri lovers figurine
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/pe_prb/p/ain_sakhri_lovers_figurine.aspx
Probably from the cave of Ain Sakhri, Wadi Khareitoun, Judea, Natufian, about 11,000 years old
This is the oldest known sculpture of a human couple making love. The natural shape of a calcite cobble has been used to represent the outline of the lovers.
Their heads, arms and legs appear as raised areas around which the surface has been picked away with a stone point . The figures look at one another but have no faces. The arms of one hug the shoulders of the other and its knees are bent up underneath those of the slightly smaller figure. The image is also phallic whichever way you look at it.
Found by a Bedouin in the Wadi Khareitoun not far from Bethlehem, the sculpture comes from the cave of Ain Sakhri. This site was occupied in the early Natufian period when the people of this region lived by hunting gazelle.
As the gazelle were not constantly on the move, their hunters also stayed in one place and varied their diet by collecting seeds, fruit and nuts. By gathering the seeds of wild forms of wheat and barley they inadvertently began the slow process of natural genetic modification which eventually allowed their deliberate cultivation.
The descendants of the Ain Sahkri lovers were farmers.
The sculpture may have had special significance, perhaps representing ideas about fertility or, reflecting new understanding of the part men played in reproduction. Less complex carvings of phalli are known from other sites of this period.
references
Political placenames
27.01.2010 13:31
I guess the problem is that "Judean" comes from the ancient Kingdom of Judah from which the Jews are descended. So the name gives the implicit idea that the area somehow "belongs" to the Jews, despite Palestinian non-Jews living there for many generations.
Surely though it is a historical fact that the Kingdom of Judah existed there many centuries ago? The fact that things have changed since then are irrelevant. It's like a road being called Mill Road despite the mill having long since gone.
What are people suggesting as a more "politically correct" name for this desert?
anon
Judean desert
28.01.2010 09:07
They want to wipe the Jewish names off the map, like his ancestors wanted to wipe off the Jews.
But surely you cannot stand to hear the truth...
Israel
@Israel
28.01.2010 10:40
Standing, sitting or even lying down, the truth is the truth - israel is an occupation! Ask yourself, when was the last time you thought for yourself outside the confines of the brainwashing you received as a child.
stitz
@ Israel
28.01.2010 16:42
Israel's plan to wipe Arabic names off the map
Jonathan Cook
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10667.shtml
Internet users paid to spread Israeli propaganda
Jonathan Cook
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10671.shtml
against hasbara
I don't think the Judean Desert is the same as the West Bank
28.01.2010 18:08
anon
Answers
01.02.2010 09:20
to Anon: (I'm not an expert, but I thought the Judean Desert was an old name for a large area of which the West Bank is a small part?) Yes, physical and political boundaries are not the same. The Judean Desert is the area east of the Judean Mountains (which run north-south from Bet El to Hebron via Jerusalem) but west of the Dead Sea/Jordan river, reaching the Negev desert in the south. Thus, the southern part of the Judean Desert is inside the 1967 borders.
Israel