Photographers Not Terrorists
Peter Marshall | 24.01.2010 16:36 | Repression
Around 2000 photographers gathered in Trafalgar Square, London today, Saturday 23 Jan, 2010, to protest at the harassment of people taking photographs by police, and in particular their abuse of powers under the Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Pictures (C) Peter Marshall, 2010, all rights reserved.
As well as perhaps two thousand people of all ages taking pictures, the event was also enlivened by several pieces of street theatre, including the Vigilance Committee with a man on stilts wearing a number of CCTV cameras accompanied by a male and female vigilance officer, who picked on individuals and questioned them, taking their fingerprints before finding them guilty and sentencing them to a choice of six years hard labour or contributing to the Vigilance Committee. Three Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence also came along and added a little colour (or pallor) to the event.
A BBC News reporter, standing in the middle of a crowd of experienced journalists used to recording large events was howled down after giving a report in which he gave the number attending the protest as "three hundred." Clearly there were at least 1500 taking part, although others estimated 2-3000. It was not a good advertisement for the competence or impartiality of the BBC who appear to have a policy of playing down dissent; their reported numbers for other events I have attended have also at times been laughably low.
The event organisers had not applied for permission to hold the event and it would have been illegal, but I was told that it seemed the authorities had put in an application on their behalf without informing them.
A longer report with more pictures is on Demotix:
http://www.demotix.com/news/229071/photographers-not-terrorists
and I'll put more pictures on My London Diary later.
A BBC News reporter, standing in the middle of a crowd of experienced journalists used to recording large events was howled down after giving a report in which he gave the number attending the protest as "three hundred." Clearly there were at least 1500 taking part, although others estimated 2-3000. It was not a good advertisement for the competence or impartiality of the BBC who appear to have a policy of playing down dissent; their reported numbers for other events I have attended have also at times been laughably low.
The event organisers had not applied for permission to hold the event and it would have been illegal, but I was told that it seemed the authorities had put in an application on their behalf without informing them.
A longer report with more pictures is on Demotix:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f97de/f97de1a1021bc79f8379f930ee70acebd7aff09c" alt=""
and I'll put more pictures on My London Diary later.
Peter Marshall
e-mail:
petermarshall@cix.co.uk
Homepage:
http://mylondondiary.co.uk
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Well done
24.01.2010 23:12
Hopefully shows that Metplod is still on the back foot regarding peaceful protest and human rights.
Well done the photogs for standing up for Freedom of Expression and their essential role as the Fourth Estate.
Harris Meant
How about organising a mass photo shoot in central London?
25.01.2010 15:00
Activist
Mass photography shoot-out
25.01.2010 15:56
See:
DW
er
25.01.2010 16:20
silly question I know but it struck me as a little obvious.
As far as I know the PIRA, Alfred Quida and friends dont tent to have little stickers saying "official terrorist" on them.
Me I would prefer to be asked than have mumbi stuff happen to me.
anon
PLease post this info to the sexy new London Indy site too...
25.01.2010 21:13
London Indymedia
Homepage:
http://london.indymedia.org.uk/