We did this.
Jake Summers | 06.12.2009 10:14
40% reduction and $700 billion reparations.
That’s what’s needed.
What we need from Copenhagen: Our emmissions 40% lower than 1990 and $700 billion reparations.
What’s on offer: Our emmisions 20% lower than 2005 levels and $10 billion reparations.
75% of carbon emissions have been produced by 20% of the world’s population.
That’s us. We are that 20%.
Our emmissions are overwhelmingly felt in the developing world.
Floods and droughts are ravaging the developing world now and can only get worse.
What needs to be done urgently:
We need to lower our emmisions to 40% below what we produced in 1990. Anything less is a joke.
We need to pay for the damage we have already caused and are continuing to cause in the developing world.
Droughts and floods:…………………………………………..$100 billion a year.
Leapfrogging over dirty energies:……………………………..$600 billion a year.
Anything less won’t work.
That’s what’s needed.
What we need from Copenhagen: Our emmissions 40% lower than 1990 and $700 billion reparations.
What’s on offer: Our emmisions 20% lower than 2005 levels and $10 billion reparations.
75% of carbon emissions have been produced by 20% of the world’s population.
That’s us. We are that 20%.
Our emmissions are overwhelmingly felt in the developing world.
Floods and droughts are ravaging the developing world now and can only get worse.
What needs to be done urgently:
We need to lower our emmisions to 40% below what we produced in 1990. Anything less is a joke.
We need to pay for the damage we have already caused and are continuing to cause in the developing world.
Droughts and floods:…………………………………………..$100 billion a year.
Leapfrogging over dirty energies:……………………………..$600 billion a year.
Anything less won’t work.
Jake Summers
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
War and Debt did this
06.12.2009 10:54
War and Debt
a long time ago
06.12.2009 12:43
Max
mistaking cause with effect
06.12.2009 13:08
I didnt cause that, the large global system which we call capital did. Most of us dont have the money, or the credit these days, to afford three holidays or a new tv every year. By blaming the whole of the global north, rather than the political and financial institutions focused upon capital accumulation you're confusing cause and effect.
these starving kids wont be fed through us reducing our emission cuts but through mass systemic change.
this nonsense environmentalism so many of you are peddling needs to stop.
see you on the streets!
x
But that's NOT "environmentalism"
06.12.2009 13:36
We can of course be committed to BOTH environmentalism and social justice. But let's keep clear in our minds which is which. "Environmental justice", trying to make sure that the burdens and costs are shared fairly by all is a SOCIAL JUSTICE issue. It becomes an ENVIRONMENTAL issue only to the extent that social injustices can lead to wars, etc. which are destructive to the environment.
To make this clear -- stopping emmissions (greatly reducing them) is environmental. Reparations, or even fairly sharing the cut back in emmissions is social justice. As far as Nature is concerned (impact on the environment) doesn't matter if the way we cut back is grossly unfair or not. Those of us who are concerned with both the environment and social justice have to take into account how our solutions for one of these affects the other, restricts our solution set.
MDN
Over Population is the Problem
06.12.2009 13:52
Rational is rationing
Nonsense
06.12.2009 14:34
The major problems in Africa are caused by interfering NGO's, climate activists, scientists, and governments who refuse to work with the locals and instead the seek to enforce their own plans upon the populace.
I recommend people read The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment, by Robin Mearns and Melissa Leach. Which basically destroys many of the racist myths that white Europeans and Americans hold about Africa.
Sick of white european bullshitery
Racist
06.12.2009 18:51
Ed