No Sharia March in London
Peter Marshall | 01.11.2009 22:27 | Anti-racism
Moderate Muslims and right-wing English groups protested peacefully next to each other against the proposal by Islam4UK for Sharia law in Britain. Islam4UK had issued a press release cancelling their March4Sharia through central London the previous day. Photos copyright (C) 2009, Peter Marshall, all rights reserved.
Although the organisers of the MARCH4SHARIAH had issued a press release the previous day announcing the cancellation of their proposed march "unique march in Central London which aimed to highlight the superiority of the Shari’ah over that of British democracy and man-made law", two groups of demonstrators still turned up at Piccadilly Cricus on Saturday to show their opposition.
The proposed march had been condemned fairly widely both by Muslims and non-Muslims across the political spectrum in the UK. Its organisers were Islam4UK, which describes itself as a platform for al-Muhajiroun, an organisation that dissolved itself after the UK government announced its intention to ban it (and its two succesor organisations were then banned under the Terrorism Act, and its founder Omar Bakri Muhammad was banned from re-entering Britain.)
A public debate on Sharia Law in London in June 2009 at which former al-Muhajiroun leader Anjem Choudary of Islam For the UK planned to relaunch al-Muhajiroun had to be abandoned after the owners of the hall refused to allow the forced segregation of men and women which was being enforced by al-Muhajiroun security guards.
Some of the groups planning to oppose the march, including Muslims4UK and The Islamic Society of Britain, called off their planned counter-demo, but supporters of other groups including British Muslims for Secular Democracy, the English Democrats and March For England and possibly a few from the EDL. Later I heard reports that more of the EDL had been wandering around the Parliament Square area where the March4Shariah had been planned to start.
The atmosphere at Piccadilly Circus was quiet and friendly and although there were several police vans down the street there was nothing for them to do. The right wing demonstrators talked and gave interviews in which they were insistent that they were not racist or opposed to Muslims in any way, but simply opposed to the imposition of sharia law in the UK. For the most part the two groups of protesters kept a few yards apart, but some of the English Democrats and others did come to talk with the Muslim groups. One young man who did express a racist view was rapidly told by his friends he was out of order.
Moderate Muslims also object the interpretation of sharia by Islam4UK and al-Muhajiroun and their desire for Britain to become a part of a universal caliphate govverned by sharia law. Nor would the great majority of Muslims here be in favour of most of the other ideas on the Islam4UK web site such as their aim to see Buckingham Palace converted into a "beautiful mosque", the Queen forced to wear a burkha, the replacement of Nelson's statue with "an exquisitely constructed Islamic clock" and "the banning of indecent organisations that are deemed anti-Islamic" from holding processions, demonstrations and concerts in Trafalgar Square.
Right-wing British newspapers use views like this, put forward by a tiny minority, to stir up hatred against all British Muslims, the vast majority of whom equally opposed to them as the rest of the population.
More pictures on Demotix
http://www.demotix.com/news/no-sharia-march-london
and more still on My London Diary in a couple of days time
http://mylondondiary.co.uk/2009/10/oct.htm
The proposed march had been condemned fairly widely both by Muslims and non-Muslims across the political spectrum in the UK. Its organisers were Islam4UK, which describes itself as a platform for al-Muhajiroun, an organisation that dissolved itself after the UK government announced its intention to ban it (and its two succesor organisations were then banned under the Terrorism Act, and its founder Omar Bakri Muhammad was banned from re-entering Britain.)
A public debate on Sharia Law in London in June 2009 at which former al-Muhajiroun leader Anjem Choudary of Islam For the UK planned to relaunch al-Muhajiroun had to be abandoned after the owners of the hall refused to allow the forced segregation of men and women which was being enforced by al-Muhajiroun security guards.
Some of the groups planning to oppose the march, including Muslims4UK and The Islamic Society of Britain, called off their planned counter-demo, but supporters of other groups including British Muslims for Secular Democracy, the English Democrats and March For England and possibly a few from the EDL. Later I heard reports that more of the EDL had been wandering around the Parliament Square area where the March4Shariah had been planned to start.
The atmosphere at Piccadilly Circus was quiet and friendly and although there were several police vans down the street there was nothing for them to do. The right wing demonstrators talked and gave interviews in which they were insistent that they were not racist or opposed to Muslims in any way, but simply opposed to the imposition of sharia law in the UK. For the most part the two groups of protesters kept a few yards apart, but some of the English Democrats and others did come to talk with the Muslim groups. One young man who did express a racist view was rapidly told by his friends he was out of order.
Moderate Muslims also object the interpretation of sharia by Islam4UK and al-Muhajiroun and their desire for Britain to become a part of a universal caliphate govverned by sharia law. Nor would the great majority of Muslims here be in favour of most of the other ideas on the Islam4UK web site such as their aim to see Buckingham Palace converted into a "beautiful mosque", the Queen forced to wear a burkha, the replacement of Nelson's statue with "an exquisitely constructed Islamic clock" and "the banning of indecent organisations that are deemed anti-Islamic" from holding processions, demonstrations and concerts in Trafalgar Square.
Right-wing British newspapers use views like this, put forward by a tiny minority, to stir up hatred against all British Muslims, the vast majority of whom equally opposed to them as the rest of the population.
More pictures on Demotix
http://www.demotix.com/news/no-sharia-march-london
and more still on My London Diary in a couple of days time
http://mylondondiary.co.uk/2009/10/oct.htm
Peter Marshall
e-mail:
petermarshall@cix.co.uk
Homepage:
http://mylondondiary.co.uk
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
Erm, WTF?
01.11.2009 23:46
"Some of the groups ... called off their planned counter-demo, but supporters of other groups including British Muslims for Secular Democracy, the English Democrats and March For England and possibly a few from the EDL. Later I heard reports that more of the EDL had been wandering around the Parliament Square area where the March4Shariah had been planned to start."
I don't care who BMSD are, as far as I can tell they're smaller than ISLAM4UK so so much for the whole "only a tiny number want this", you've basically said "Members of the EDL congregated on Britains streets to oppose the far right and no one came out to smash their presence". I don't call that something worth celebrating as your language suggests, I think its a failure of the left and should be acknowledged.
No Pasaran!
Annoyed
Reply to annoyed
02.11.2009 00:06
Confused
Some good photos but. . .
02.11.2009 00:45
These people don't need encouraging adn they don't need positive publicity. Why so many photos of British Nationalists???
The Placards on show calling for "secular democracy" are very witty yet are barely featured, who made them, why??
Not so sure about "Peter Marshall". . . . one too many crappy stories
Actually
Not necessarily Muslims
02.11.2009 05:14
The photo captioned "Dialogue" for instance looks to be of a Sikh man, though of course I could be wrong. But then again, how do we know he isn't Sikh?
Anyway point is that both the BNP and EDL have spent a lot of time engaging the Hindu and Sikh communities, and there are a minority of people in those communities who support the BNP and EDL because they all have one thing in common: anti-Muslim bigotry.
So when you see these kinds of protests, don't automatically assume the dark-skinned people are Muslim just because of their skin colour or some of the men have beards.
Muslims who are against extremism would not stand alongside far-right English nationalists - that doesn't make any sense since both the EDL and BNP are widely recognised as extremist groups.
Jeremy
religion IS fascism
02.11.2009 10:19
But tactically the EDL are doing something that anarchists and anti-fascists should be doing themselves. Religions are fascist institutions so they all deserve attacking (not just Islam). I certainly don't want to live in a religious state, neither an Islamic one nor the Christian one that we have at the moment (the unelected Archbishop of Canterbury can vote on laws that affect us).
Attacking religion should be something WE are doing on the anarchist and anti-fascist left. Not leaving it to cryto-fascists like the EDL who single out one religion and probably count a good amount of Bible-bashing Christians in their midst.
atheist anti-fascist
a good report
02.11.2009 12:16
clearly the article is a fair and fine report of what happened. if indymedia had more reports like this more people might read it. all to often it has over ideological rants that can only be understood by those already deeply immersed in the arguments. there is always bound to be bias through choice of what to report, but this makes a good attempt to be nuanced and rounded.
the idiots over at the SWP think that any condemnation of religious nutters is fascism. name calling has got us nowhere much with the BNP.
spsppspsps (against British/English nationalists and religious nutters although making the queen cover her ugly mug is a good idea)
spsps
nothing wrong with patriotism
02.11.2009 23:11
I believe in what England stands for, not this new fangled Sharia nonsense
Klibrof
no, patriotism is bullshit
03.11.2009 00:53
yes there is, patriotism is just blind following of your leaders. It's as much like dogma as religion is. What happened to thinking for yourself and supporting whatever you feel is right, whether that be what your immediate neighbours think, or what people halfway round the world think?
Borders and carving the world up into country "prisons" which we are only allowed out of under strict conditions is part of what keeps us divided and ruled. I think the world would be a far better place if there were no borders, no countries, no religions, and no patriotism.
atheist anti-fascist