Skip to content or view screen version

Police surveillance of climate activist vehicles

fitwatch | 13.10.2009 16:07 | Climate Chaos

Climate Camp activists intending to drive to the Swoop on Radcliff on the 17th October should be prepared to take a few precautions if they want to avoid being picked up by vehicle surveillance.

Police ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Reader) units have been used before at Climate Camp actions to alert police to the arrival of ‘known’ activists. Police at Kingsnorth used ANPR to monitor and intercept activist cars as they arrived. It is possible that a similar strategy will be used in Nottingham.

The police have for some years been collecting the vehicle registration numbers of vehicles used to get to protests, gatherings and even meetings. If your registration number is on this list, it could be picked up by the ANPR system.

How does ANPR work?

Motorways have permanent ANPR cameras, but mobile units can also be used on minor roads. Mobile ANPR units can be covert (hidden), but they are usually very obvious transit sized vans marked with camera symbols.

The cameras automatically read the number plates of cars passing by. The on-board computer then checks the numbers against a number of different databases. This is usually car registration, insurance, MOT etc, but the ANPR units can also check if your car is on a list of ‘protest’ vehicles.

If the ANPR flags up a ‘hit’ the police can be instructed either to simply note the fact you have arrived (perhaps flagging you up for more targeted surveillance), or to intercept the car. If you are stopped the police have powers to search the car similar to those they would use on a pedestrian (see below).

How do I avoid getting picked up by ANPR?

This is a fairly new police tactic, so this advice can hardly be said to be tried and tested - it is based only on informed guesswork. There are no guarantees!

If possible, drive a car that has never been used to get to a protest or gathering before. In theory at least, if you have not used your car in ‘protest related activity’ before, it should not be picked up. If it is, we would be particularly keen to know about it.

Borrow a vehicle from friends and family rather than hire one. Hire cars were routinely picked up by ANPR readers in Kingsnorth, so are not the ideal choice!

Don’t take a car without insurance and MOT – ANPRs are routinely used to pick up cars that are not street legal.

Take a longer, quieter route in. At Kingsnorth ANPR was put on the major access routes. The police have limited ANPR resources and can’t put all roads under surveillance, although they will try to cover those routes that are hardest to avoid.

Get dirty. ANPR readers need a standard, UK, clean number plate to get a read. Non-standard number plates, foreign plates and plates that are very dirty cause problems for the ANPR. You might want to drive down a very wet muddy road before you get there.

What should I do if notice an ANPR unit by the side of the road?

Note down all the details – location, direction, time etc – and let others know who may be travelling that way. And please tell us – the more info we have, the better we can keep track of what they are up to.

What powers do they have to stop and search a vehicle?

The police have the power to stop any vehicle, and ask the driver for their driving licence. Contrary to what some coppers say, you do not have to carry your driving licence with you, although you can be asked to produce it at a police station of your choice within seven days.

The driver of the vehicle is obliged to give their name, address and date of birth (s164 s165 Road Traffic Act 1988). The police have NO powers to demand the names and addresses of passengers. If they ask anyone other than the driver for their details they should be politely told where to go.

Police can carry out the stop and search of a vehicle under the same provisions applying to people on foot. A section 60 order, if in place, also applies to vehicles. Otherwise the police can search under PACE, but need the normal reasonable suspicion that they may find weapons, articles that could be used to cause criminal damage etc. They do not need the owners consent.


If you do notice ANPR cameras, or your vehicle is stopped on the way to climate camp, please let us know at FITwatch.

 defycops@yahoo.co.uk.

Further discussion on the FITwatch blog

fitwatch
- e-mail: defycops@yahoo.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.fitwatch.co.uk

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Live by the ANPR die by the ANPR

13.10.2009 18:04

Here's an idea.... if you think your reg has been previously clocked by the filth why not get someone else (who doesn't want to be at the demo) insured on it and get them to drive round the area in it. The more times the police stop it the less resources they have to stop activists....if enough did this it might make them forget about using ANPR.
Also the police would have to keep stopping it if it went back and forth through the area just in case it was used by the real person. If you find the police no longer stopping it the real person can start driving it again ;)

AN Idea


Driver's Legal Briefing

13.10.2009 19:37

Thanks Fitwatchers!

Here's the Climate Camp Wales Driver's Legal Briefing:

 http://climatecampcymru.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Drivers-Legal-Briefing.pdf

x

squatticus


@ AN Idea

13.10.2009 20:01

Good idea, but rather than wild goose chases a more direct approach is obvious. For legal reasons I can't suggest smashing or spraying or hacking these cameras enroute to an event, and dismantling and reselling the connected solar panels and valuable high capacity batteries on the majority of non-mains sites along roadways would also be illegal. However, if you noticed a bit of wet paper had wrapped around the lens then it is obviously not your job to remove it.

Danny


Don't fucking drive to protests

13.10.2009 20:04

Interesting how the default advice assumes ppl will be driving there.
I don't see how so many 'climate activists' miss the hypocrisy of telling other people how to live differently whilst not doing it themselves. Same applies to being vegan. Communal spaces at Clitcamp might be vegan but a large number of 'participants' won't even be veggie.
Get on yer bikes and be under the states surveillance radar!

radical idea?


Notts cameras&reply to "you're not perfect so stop campaigning, go sit armchair

13.10.2009 20:35

Comment on original useful thread:
some towns now are ringed with fixed traffic control cameras that clock vehicles number plates - the City of London, and Manchester being some obvious ones. On the 'ring of steel', it's every vehicle-passable road; in Manchester it's trunk routes at key points. From memory, some of the dual carriageways in and out of Nottingham also have this ANPR technology, so avoid going in there if possible, and beware of crossing under motorways - they may (or may not) have ANPR cameras fitted on the flyover over your carriageway.

Comment on tangent:
Please give people the credit for actually thinking about their choices and not just driving for the sake of it! You cannot take part in a mass pre-announced action and hope to get enough people near enough the intended target on bicycles - unfortunately, vehicles make tactical sense in the fucked-up world we still live in.
And people aren't preaching to others how to live their lives, only pointing out the reality and consequences of (all of) our choices.

blurg


rubbish

13.10.2009 21:59

> unfortunately, vehicles make tactical sense in the fucked-up world we still live in.
What? You mean getting from A -> B ?

> And people aren't preaching to others how to live their lives, only pointing out the reality and consequences of (all of) our choices.
Yes they are. Activists "demand" change. Closing of coal stations, etc etc.
I've never heard an activist point something out then go "but its up to you, you don't have to do it"

Steeff


Any pictures?

13.10.2009 22:38

What do the ANPR cameras look like? How can we tellthe difference between ANPR and standard speed cameras?

whatty?


inside the girls’ lavatories at a school in Wales

13.10.2009 23:05

>How can we tell the difference between ANPR and standard speed cameras?

ANPR cameras used to be the ones hanging off bridges on motorways or on posts every 1.5km. These systems are now being linked to local government and police CCTV in towns so your question is too late.

Short answer, you can't tell the difference anymore and should treat any fixed, 'public' camera as dangerous.

There are nationwide network of these beasts that have been or can be photogrpahed here. And this evil infrastructure could all be ripped up tonight if enough people were up for it.

CCTV in general is an evil.

Soaring CCTV cameras ‘are costly, futile and politically motivated’
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6871833.ece

CCTV fails to cut crime and the technology needs to be curbed in Scotland, where the number of cameras has almost doubled in the past six years, a leading academic has said. Mike Press, who has spent the past decade studying how design can contribute to crime reduction, told The Times that the expensive policy is politically motivated and ineffectual. He also warned that it can have the opposite effect of that intended, by giving citizens a false sense of security and encouraging them to be careless with property and personal safety. “We should, as a society, question why we have got it,” said the professor of design policy at Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art and Design in Dundee. “Our civil liberties have been crushed and trampled upon and compressed and this is part of that. We have yet to see it have any positive impact. I think we should have a moratorium on it.”...
In London in 2007, only one crime was solved for every 1,000 cameras, according to an internal police report...
The use of CCTV provokes fury among many civil libertarians but some specific instances have prompted particular ire. These include protesters at a closure-threatened school in Glasgow being monitored, and footage being taken inside the girls’ lavatories at a school in Wales.

Danny


driving

14.10.2009 08:44

so let me get this straight

your DRIVING in an atmosphere polluting car to protest about climate change

joined up thinking there guys

jim


tangent continued

14.10.2009 09:49

Steeff and jim, you seem from your comments not to have actually got out there and been involved in a big direct action that is: a) not accessible by public transport b) involves avoiding the police who are expecting us, both to get there and to escape, or be picked up from rural police stations in the middle of the night.

And I'm not preaching, I'm not demanding change. I'm trying to close bad things (that's the definition of direct action), and in my own life I make lifestyle choices that might give us all a chance of survival (but I don't go round telling others to do so). To make it explicit for you, you don't have to make those choices as well (me telling you to in any case isn't really going to change you now is it). Anyway, this tangent is boring and in no way new, so others'll have to take up the cudgel if really necessary on this thread.

blurg


Oh come on....

14.10.2009 10:28

It's a tactical issue. What you can shift in rucksacks, on bikes or by public transport (if any) in the way of tents, literature, tools, water, food and other equipment -never mind numbers of people- is strictly limited. I know, I've half killed myself walking miles to actions with a stupid amount of weight, and then not been able to take all that was really necessary.

I think some purists just haven't thought through what's involved in a large number of people coming together with enough food, water and shitting facilities, let alone what's required to do whatever they've planned. Please show me your designs for lightweight arm tubes and lock-ons which can be carried on a bike but can't be cut through in 5 minutes (i.e. involving no concrete or steel). The radical new type of bike-transportable tripod which is invisible in transit would also be interesting.

Anyone remember the pink castle? (A whole fucken prefabricated building erected in the entrance to a field to stop the planting of GM crops.) Could that have been done with bikes and racksacks? Or should we just not do actions like that any more? Should we just shout and give out a few leaflets until they run out because we couldn't carry any more? Writing letters to the Guardian is more effective than that!

If you're going to knock people driving to an action such as Climate Swoop (about which I have strong reservations for other reasons not relevant here) you need to come up with some entirely new tactics involving nothing heavy or bulky and relatively few people in one place at one time.

Having said all that, people should always consider whether there's a practical alternative to driving, whether it will be more or less susceptible to police disruption and such issues as where vehicles can be left, number plate recognition etc. Actions should be planned to reduce vehicle/miles to a minimum, but the notion that anything big can be done with none is ridiculous.

In real life, theoretical perfectionism stops us doing anything effective or constructive at all.

Stroppyoldgit


And another thing....

14.10.2009 10:56

It takes a hell of a lot of COAL to make a bike. NO, there isn't an alternative except in the fantasies of impractical dreamers. Same goes for a solar panel, a wind genny or having your head stitched up when the cops have tonked you with a baton.

So, if the purism of people like Jim was applied all these things, and many others, would have to go, too. Exactly the same "contradiction" applies to arriving at Radcliffe on a bike as in a car.

Most of the energy used -and emissions produced- by a car, van or truck are in its manufacture. Driving cars etc. is a minor source of emissions compared with the process of making them. We should stop making all but a very few of them, and make those to last, but meantime they exist. What do you want to do with them? Scrap and recycle them? That's another load of COAL, then.

Tell you what, let's use some of those vehicles sensibly for direct action while we're working that one out, shall we?

Stroppyoldgit


answers to your questions?

14.10.2009 12:52

"Get dirty. ANPR readers need a standard, UK, clean number plate to get a read. Non-standard number plates, foreign plates and plates that are very dirty cause problems for the ANPR. You might want to drive down a very wet muddy road before you get there."

To drive any vehicle with a damaged or obscured number plate is an offence.

What should I do if notice an ANPR unit by the side of the road?

So what, considering that its the vehicle that is being checked, so what, has the vehicle been stolen, ringed, declared off road, or holds no tax/mot? Then why worry?

Typical scaremongering by the all CCTV is evil group, with the info going to a mithical super computer in the bowls of downing street with a single glowing eye!!!!

Politicians cant even run thier own expense accounts without falling over, where the hell do you think they would have got the brains to build this "state system"?

"Note down all the details – location, direction, time etc – and let others know who may be travelling that way. And please tell us – the more info we have, the better we can keep track of what they are up to."

In London they are also in marked cars so that idea is fairly redundent. Really, just go and have fun, dont chuck stuff or be a pain in the arse and you will be amazed at how little the police care.

anon


shouldnt feed the trolls but...

14.10.2009 13:20

You'd be surprised how little the Police care? Suggestions that people don't take anti-surveillance measures? Hmmm. You do know this is the alleged target of an alleged action allegedly being planned earlier this year, where 114 people were arrested in the middle of the night before they had even got within 10 miles of the place, if that is indeed where any of them were planning to go (God, legalese massacres language!)? There are 2 responses to the upping of Police tactics on environmental, and particularly climate, actions and protests. One is to get together with a trusted afinity group, chose a date, and just go do it when there isnt a major police operation around your target (this is probably the most effective approach, in terms of likelihood of success, but needs to have excellent media and legal support). The other is to defy the restrictions and call for a mass, publically advertised action. The likelihood of practical success (e.g. of shutting down the target) may be lower, but the media interest should be higher, and the number of people empowered by taking part is also larger. In both cases, reducing the ease with which the Police can monitor, record and prevent what we want to do is a "no regrets" option, it can ony have positive effects if it does not severely restrict what you plan to do anyway.

@TP


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

timetable

14.10.2009 18:22

ok what time we meeting up i just flew in on my private jet and got my 4x4 all fueled up and ready to go and kick some climate change butt

i hate these scum that dont take climate change seriously i just hope they dont mention the fact that 20 years ago global cooling was a major problem i think we dodged that bullet hey guys

mike


re: answers to your questions?

14.10.2009 22:30

> To drive any vehicle with a damaged or obscured number plate is an offence.
Yeah, like the rest of the stuff we do isn't an offence!!

> So what, considering that its the vehicle that is being checked, so what, has the vehicle been stolen,
> ringed, declared off road, or holds no tax/mot? Then why worry?
I agree that it might be unlikely to work to write down the details of all ANPR cameras and share them effectively, but you sound like another person who's not experienced actions and what happens to known activist vehicles: once your number plate gets 'flagged' then you end up being stopped by random passing police cars when you're doing nothing at all, but your numberplate that they have put in their computer says "stop this car", or police track vehicles on their way to a protest, either if it's a secret action finding out about it and where it is, or by stopping you and hassling you/confiscating equipment etc. That's the reality.

blurg


reply

15.10.2009 15:22

There is a pic of a standard ANPR on the FITwatch blog, but not all of them are this obvious.

The point about the rings of ANPR around major cities is a good one. It is becoming harder and harder to move around the country without being picked up by police on ANPR, which is something that happens regularly to protest vehicles.

Those who say we are scaremongering really miss the point. Paranoia helps no-one, but a real understanding of how and what surveillance is being used helps us all to either
a) avoid getting caught by it, or
b) resist and challenge it
depending on your point of view.

PS drivers legal briefing is useful, particularly on road safety checks.

fighting fit


Limited ANPR resource ?!?!

16.10.2009 11:11

Hi,

Don't really understand the "limited ANPR resource" bit. Most (all?) police patrol cars (marked and unmarked) are now fitted with ANPR, so it's very easy to cover every road in an area.

The real question is:
Is ANPR "only" used to compare the registration against databases (uninsured driver, taxes, "intelligence") or more worryingly used to gather intelligence/record every cars in an area... if the same registration has been spotted around 2 climate camps it's easy to dig out that the registered keeper is very likely to be a dangerous climate terrorist.....

Afaik it has always been publicly announced that ANPR will not be used to monitor your move but... don't really trust them on that one (or anything else).

Steph


ACPO policy on ANPR - "Protest" Warning Marker on the ANPR database

18.10.2009 13:05

ACPO policy on ANPR: The Management and Use of Automatic Number Plate Recognition

There seems to be a "Protest" Warning Marker on the National ANPR Database, which may be used or abused by the Police to arbitrarily blacklist a particular vehicle (probably forever).

ACPO policy on ANPR: The Management and Use of Automatic Number Plate Recognition
 http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/ANPR_genesis.pdf

Appendix 2
NAAS Database
Template

REASON

3rd WORD
Drugs
Crime
Disqualified
Docs
Drink Drive
Sexual
Other
Protest
VISOR
NO STOP
Intel

For silent checks enter NO STOP

wtwu
mail e-mail: blog@spy.org.uk
- Homepage: http://SpyBlog.org.uk


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments