Skip to content or view screen version

Unemployed Workers Union

little person | 10.10.2009 12:00

Sounds like something good, this...
Was on Facebook

Unemployed Workers Union
Category: Organizations - Political Organizations
Description: Unemployed Workers Union
UWU



A union of the Unemployed has been formed, a number of branchs have already opened. Many more are springing up around Britain and Ireland

We intend to form a Mass Union for all Unemployed people. We wish for each Branch to affiliate to the national body, though the union should be federalised, at least in its initial stages. We can’t have a top down approach. Those involved in Salford have merely called the action, it is for others to support it…

We propose a National Conference should be held for all interested parties and so we can begin the democratic organisation of this Union of the Unemployed.

Negotiations with other National Unions have begun. Offers of support and affiliation would be welcomed. Its too long that the Unemployed have gone without proper Representation…


The fee for an Unemployed Worker to join the Union is £1 for membership fee and a 10p monthly sub.


The Union is open for workers to join at a cost of £5 per month.


The UWU is not conventional in the sense of a standard Industrial Union and legally must not be treated as such. We aim to build Solidarity between Workers and the Unemployed. We also seek proper representation and the right to work for all unemployed people.


We are currently working on Provisional systems of running and expanding the organisation. We need your participation.




Public Appeal

We need as many Trade Union affiliations and donations.

If you are in a Union then please could you affiliate your Branch to the Unemployed Workers Union.

We also need volunteers in every corner of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. Don’t Hesitate to get in touch.

If there are any existing local or regional groups of Unemployed then we would like to disscuss affiliation and cooperation between our organisation.

Also a very important request to PCS members is that we need Cooperation in Job Centres around the country. Many can be hostile! Please get in touch and we can work out a liaison system.





For more information

or email Alex Halligan at  vollunteer@hotmail.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A Charter for Unemployed has been drafted which includes.

• The Right to Work for All
• The National Minimum Wage of £8 per hour
• Free Transport for Unemployed
• Free Prescriptions
• Free Legal Advice
• Improved Welfare Benefits
• Unemployment Benefit 70% of New National Minimum Wage
• Abolition of Student Fees
• Mass Apprenticeship Scheme for All Young People
• Nationalisation of Companies going into Bankruptcy and Liquidation, this would save jobs and stimulate the manufacturing industry


little person

Comments

Hide the following comment

Nationalisation

10.10.2009 18:43

The "demand" for nationalisation of liquidated and bankrupt businesses can be financed from the existing unemployed training budget.


It has been demonstrated, in principle, that nationalisation is a fair strategy (Northern Rock) even with World Trade Organisation constraints. To fail to allow a failed business to be nationalised would give banks an unfair advantage. To allow the temporary nationalisation of a bank but not of a business would end the "level playing field" that politicians suppose to be a sacred cow.

The liquidation or bankruptcy requires receivership. The Administrator or Reciever has a duty of care to obtain the best deal for "the business". This duty can be fulfilled by appealing to the exchequer to nationalise the business. This keeps the business in existence. The Receiver or Adminstrator can then propose that the Employees are notional assets of the business on the basis that unemployment would entitle them to some benefits. The difference between all of the business's employees prior remuneration and benefits would be the amount of investment that they bring to rescuing the business.

It would be fair to argue, given the employees have an interest, that the employees have a fair collective claim to the balance of assets and the interests of both government and oppostion policy - as outlined from 2003 onwards - would be served by recognising that interest. Even if the business were to subsequently fail - and nobody expects every business to magically succeed by being owned by workers - it would be cheaper to the Exchequer to simply ring-fence the entire Unemployment Training budget for this purpose.

Put simply, even if you take every single business that fails into workers ownership, supported by government, then the long term benefit is greater than training the unemployed on existing training programs. The businesses given a stay of execution would support the economy far more effectively than training courses that deliver no training. Even if the business subsequently failed - and there is only reason in Accounting to rescue a business for 18 months to two years - then, quite simply, the scheme would save the Exchequer billions in lost taxes and saved benefits.

And some of those businesses would succeed. Even those who argue for permanent national ownership can recognise the value of this. Those businesses that do succeed would all demonstrate that the scheme of temporary national ownership places the interest of the Exchequer, Workers and National Economy and incubating new businesses over handouts - either to the rich or to the poor. £1.7Bn has been put aside for supporting the New Deal - not to mention the Billions in actual benefits, fraud investigations, training provider bidding and so on.

The finance would be better spent investing in start up businesses. If Vestas were to have all of the financial backing of not putting people on the dole and investing in its future that would strengthen the UK economy more than making people apply for three jobs a day and fiddling travel expenses. Nationalisation is a strategy that reduces pointless handouts.

Nationalisation is, in fact, a strategy that obtains a return for the Exchequer, that reduces the benefits bill but, also - potentially - creates thriving businesses. Most people who are unemployed wish to have some kind of work. Those who have no desire to work whatsoever (and they are a tiny minority) have been the focus of policy since the Elizabethan Workhouse. Criminalising the Unemployed is a failed strategy. Those who wish to carve a niche of alternative economic existence are also served by such a strategy. Even the Tories can have no great objection to this strategy - because even if one nationalised business succeeds that leaves the economy with more jobs, more tax income, fewere unemployed and a whole load of the policy buzzwords they all love so much.





Unemployed Without Benefits