Skip to content or view screen version

Camp Ashraf Hunger Strikes 36 released, London - pictures.

Terence Bunch | 07.10.2009 21:30 | Iraq | Repression | Terror War | World

72 days after hunger strikes start around the world in protest at the attacks carried out by Iraqi security forces on Camp Ashraf, Iraq releases 36 Iranian pro-democracy prisoners it has been holding arbitrarily in extra-judicial detention.

The Hunger Strikes end.
The Hunger Strikes end.

The announcement is made.
The announcement is made.

The congratulations begin.
The congratulations begin.

Victory salute.
Victory salute.

Farzaneh Dadkhah and victory.
Farzaneh Dadkhah and victory.

Punching the air.
Punching the air.

Fatemah Khezri and Soudabeh Heidari.
Fatemah Khezri and Soudabeh Heidari.

Some tributes.
Some tributes.

Coming to an end.
Coming to an end.


72 days after hunger strikes start around the world in protest at the attacks carried out by Iraqi security forces on Camp Ashraf, Iraq releases 36 Iranian pro-democracy prisoners it has been holding arbitrarily in extra-judicial detention.

The 36 detainees are released from detention early on the morning of 7th October and are taken immediately back to Camp Ashraf. Observers claim the men are in poor physical health as a result of their detention.

In London, one of the sites of the worldwide hunger strikes, Iranians end their hunger strike in jubilant scenes outside the embassy of the United States in Grosvenor Square.

They spend the day congratulating each other on their success, watching a press conference that takes place in Paris formally announcing the release and preparing to take the now former hunger strikers to hospital for formal medical examination to assess their health post protest.

US embassy, London, UK. 07th October 2009.

Terence Bunch
- e-mail: terry.bunch@terencebunch.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.terencebunch.co.uk/PUBLIC/camp-ashraf-hunger-strikers-day-72-us-embassy-london-36-hostages-released-07-10-2009.php

Additions

Context.

09.10.2009 17:31

"This article really lacks historical background or context."

This story has been ongoing since July and has been posted on IM regularly since then in the form of updates. To provide historical updates is a problem as it means endlessly repeating content over and over again.

The newswire is not really the place to post historical context except at the start of a story/event/action.

For a timeline of events posted here at IM:

4th August 2009.
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6739371.ece

7th August 2009.
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/08/435859.html

31st August 2009.
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/oxford/2009/08/437073.html

4th September 2009.
 https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2009/09/437352.html

6th September 2009
 https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2009/09/437466.html

10th September 2009
 https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2009/09/437717.html

24th September 2009
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/09/438595.html

4th October 2009
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/10/439169.html

And then this report.




Terence Bunch
mail e-mail: terry.bunch@terencebunch.co.uk


Comments

Hide the following comment

some background on Camp Ashraf.. more needed

09.10.2009 15:49

This article really lacks historical background or context. I was intrigued to find out more and did a very quick amount of net research. The following is a summary based on reading just a few different sites:

----------
Camp Ashraf is the base of a group called the 'People's Mujahedin of Iran', a leftist dissident group which organised against the Shah but also against the Islamic Republic which replaced him. Their theory was a fusion of Islamism and Marxism, their most visible tactics were armed struggle, bombing campaigns, assassination etc.

They were given bases, equipment, weapons etc in Iraq by Saddam, and fought on the Iraqi side in the Iran-Iraq war. There are allegations that they were involved in killing off opponents of Saddam. After the invasion of Iraq they disarmed and surrendered to the Americans, and were put under their protection, since they would obviously be unpopular with many Iraqis, due to their support for Saddam, but also with the Iranian regime, which would probably like to have them imprisoned or executed.

But Camp Ashraf was transferred to Iraqi control recently, and the residents are now being persecuted by the Iraqi government, hence the recent attack on the Camp.
--------
 http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/07/31/iraq-protect-camp-ashraf-residents
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Mujahedin_of_Iran
 http://www.english.mojahedin.org
--------

Can someone with more in-depth political knowledge comment further on this?

Obviously they are more than just another armed group; they must have a decent social base in order to be able to inspire these sorts of solidarity protests worldwide. What are there politics nowadays? How do they justify collaborating with one tyrannical regime (in Iraq) in order to overthrow another? Or are they a group that started with progressive values and was corrupted by the hierarchies and atrocities inherent in an armed struggle?

Tom R