It was good to get off but it would have been better if we had won the case on the issues about increased cancer deaths, breaches of health and safety... and all the other issues we brought up. There had been two previous blockades:
August 2007:  https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/379149.html
December 2007:  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/12/386851.html
which surprisingly did not result in arrests.
We have had several other protests at the site including  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti73TfSFSJU
I will not put up our legal defence here but if anyone is on charges and wont to find out more please do not hesitate to contact us.
The judge did not get round to considering the evidence provided by the defendants. This included the KiKK which is a German study that showed that there are large increases of Leukaemia and other cancers in the vicinity of nuclear power plants similar to the one at Sizewell B. They also claimed that several breaches of nuclear regulations leading up to and after the leak at Sizewell A in 2007 meant that the plant was not operating legally.
KiKK report
Background to report and links to report:  http://www.bfs.de/en/kerntechnik/kinderkrebs/kikk.html
Ian Fairlie comments on the KiKK report in the New Scientist:  http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19826535.300-comment-lets-take-cancer-clusters-seriously-this-time.html
Sizewell Leak
Sizewell A – Cooling Pond Recirculation Pipe Failure Incident Of 7 January 2007. Assessment Of The Nii Decision Making Process, John Large Associates  http://www.largeassociates.com/cz3179/R3179-A3.pdf
Sizewell nuclear disaster averted by dirty laundry, says official report, Guardian June 2009:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/11/nuclear-waste-nuclearpower
Alarm did not sound for Sizewell leak, Evening Star January 2007:  http://www.eveningstar.co.uk/content/eveningstar/news/story.aspx?brand=ESTOnline&category=News&tBrand=ESTOnline&tCategory=news&itemid=IPED09%20Jan%202007%2014%3A08%3A23%3A043

plunk