Yes-Men entertain, then anger audience
Audience | 12.08.2009 16:50 | Analysis | Culture | Other Press
The simulataneous screening of the new Yes Men film yesterday first entertain, then disappointed in a big way.
Did you watch the Yes Men's latest film yesterday? I did, in my local cinema, as part of a simultaneous screening taking place across the country. The film was hilarious, thought-provoking, inspiring to a certain extent, educational no doubt for some people in attendance. People laughed out loud or clapped while watching, and cried at certain points,especially when the supposed "victims" of their hoaxes: the poor of Bhopal and New Orleans etc, fully supported their scams. Or when Kyrgystan offered yurts to those made homeless by Katrina (although this was no doubt organised by the Yes Men too). All in all, a great cinema experience.
Then it all went a bit weird. The showing was "backed" (sponsored?) by a charity, an NGO. After the film, we watched an awful broadcast from a participating cinema in Sheffield. A panel consisting of the Yes Men, a member of Cabaret Voltaire and somebody else (who the hell was he?) were asked questions by a media wannabe pretty boy, passing on texted questions too, and members of the audience.
It was unclear what was more embarrassing, the awful failure to imitate a late-night culture and arts discussion programme, or the lack of politics or inspiration on offer, particularly from the Yes Men themselves, but all were culpable.
The questions addressed genuine enough issues, but despite having produced a blinding critique of neo-liberal capitalism, the Yes Men's suggestion was that people "do something", and then the world would be a better place.
Er, OK, do what?
Put their names on a clip-board to receive emails.
And?
Their names would be given to the charities and NGOs sponsiring the events and on the Yes Men web-page.
OK. And then what?
People have to ask the government to make things better.
You what?
Yeah, like, renewable energy could be paid for by the Government increasing taxes a little, OK, a lot
Well, this all sounds revolutionary, what else?
Well, as we saw in the US, things only really change during progressive governments, so here in the UK maybe you need to wait a while until the Government gets replaced by a better one [some cultural ignorance here perhaps, do they not know that in the UK, we have GOT the supposedly more progressive of the 2-party state options?]
What about state repression of protest (the film nicked clips of anti-capitalist protests while urging everyone to "do something")? Pre-emptive arrests? Factory occupations (Vestas was raised)?
Yeah, cool, we haven't got arrested and we did some pretty cool stuff, we did a cost benefit analysis and decided that it was worth risking arrest. Cool. And yesterday in support of Vestas we did a cool photo-opportunity, sorry, protest at Ed Millbands house.
Likewise any other form of action (e.g. boycotts) were trashed as ineffective, and the calls to action became more and more vaccuous ("If you're a film-maker, make a film, if you're a musician, make music": So, we should all just do what we do anyway?). In conclusion, people in the cinema I was in got more and more incredulous at the lack of analysis or suggestions of what people could do about the whole venal, exploitative system of profit maximisation, beyond petitioning "good government" to stop the nasty businesses. People yelled at the screen, got up and walked out.
I am interested to know, what happened in other screenings? This seemed like a good opportunity to capitalise on some kind of energy and willingness to discuss shared action, and instead all the anger, compassion and hope got squashed out by some weird TV-mimicking media dribble that actively supressed any model of social change beyond lobbying within the liberal democratic system. Isn't that what we have already?
Then it all went a bit weird. The showing was "backed" (sponsored?) by a charity, an NGO. After the film, we watched an awful broadcast from a participating cinema in Sheffield. A panel consisting of the Yes Men, a member of Cabaret Voltaire and somebody else (who the hell was he?) were asked questions by a media wannabe pretty boy, passing on texted questions too, and members of the audience.
It was unclear what was more embarrassing, the awful failure to imitate a late-night culture and arts discussion programme, or the lack of politics or inspiration on offer, particularly from the Yes Men themselves, but all were culpable.
The questions addressed genuine enough issues, but despite having produced a blinding critique of neo-liberal capitalism, the Yes Men's suggestion was that people "do something", and then the world would be a better place.
Er, OK, do what?
Put their names on a clip-board to receive emails.
And?
Their names would be given to the charities and NGOs sponsiring the events and on the Yes Men web-page.
OK. And then what?
People have to ask the government to make things better.
You what?
Yeah, like, renewable energy could be paid for by the Government increasing taxes a little, OK, a lot
Well, this all sounds revolutionary, what else?
Well, as we saw in the US, things only really change during progressive governments, so here in the UK maybe you need to wait a while until the Government gets replaced by a better one [some cultural ignorance here perhaps, do they not know that in the UK, we have GOT the supposedly more progressive of the 2-party state options?]
What about state repression of protest (the film nicked clips of anti-capitalist protests while urging everyone to "do something")? Pre-emptive arrests? Factory occupations (Vestas was raised)?
Yeah, cool, we haven't got arrested and we did some pretty cool stuff, we did a cost benefit analysis and decided that it was worth risking arrest. Cool. And yesterday in support of Vestas we did a cool photo-opportunity, sorry, protest at Ed Millbands house.
Likewise any other form of action (e.g. boycotts) were trashed as ineffective, and the calls to action became more and more vaccuous ("If you're a film-maker, make a film, if you're a musician, make music": So, we should all just do what we do anyway?). In conclusion, people in the cinema I was in got more and more incredulous at the lack of analysis or suggestions of what people could do about the whole venal, exploitative system of profit maximisation, beyond petitioning "good government" to stop the nasty businesses. People yelled at the screen, got up and walked out.
I am interested to know, what happened in other screenings? This seemed like a good opportunity to capitalise on some kind of energy and willingness to discuss shared action, and instead all the anger, compassion and hope got squashed out by some weird TV-mimicking media dribble that actively supressed any model of social change beyond lobbying within the liberal democratic system. Isn't that what we have already?
Audience
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Yeah
12.08.2009 17:10
The screening's weren't sponsored by NGOs - local groups were allowed to speak about local activism (and got free tickets, woo!) after the screenings, in exchange for plugging the film on their website (bit like Age of Stupid).
Ms Anne Thropy
? how come they are doing something with climate camp & plane stupid then
13.08.2009 21:17
james
why do we have to critisize EVERYTHING
14.08.2009 13:10
sigh
Stunt Girl vs Yes Men
14.08.2009 21:14
The only time I got to ask the Yes Men a short, sensible question they were also asked a long, self-promoting questions by a paedo-protestor who was solely trying to boost his own chances of getting laid by a 16 year old boy, but you can't blame the faults of the audience on the talent.
Did the Yes Men hit Union Carbide in the pocket? Yes, they did. Have the people here who have criticised the Yes Men hit a better target harder? No, they haven't.
Danny
careful
16.08.2009 07:58
anyway!
yes the Yes Men's actions, and their film, are fine examples of what can be done when people work well together and get creative, and swallow their fear just to get out there and put some crazy ideas into careful and concerted practice. but as they said in the film, all their stunts, and also all the actions of the others of us up to stuff, have not yet stopped enough of the extreme craziness at work in the world.
and we do need to stop more of it, and make more good things happen.
and so we all need to find new ways of being and acting.
for our selves as well as the world..
agreed the Q and A was shocking, i was in Islington and people were laughing and grumbling noisily at the screen, gender analysing the panel (not mentioned yet here above...) and pointedly walking out of the Q and A. I do hope that whoever organised it in Sheffield has had a bit of word with themselves, if no one else got there first.
but in a way you can't blame the NGOs. they exist largely to service the guilt of large numbers of people in this country who live a more comfortable life than their ancestors did and (partly for that reason) can't imagine stepping out of their 9-5 and mortgage safety zones. and for many of them, signing up with a critical, justice-focused group like WDM is pretty radical - more so anyway than (say) giving money to Oxfam... which most people in this country don't even get as far as doing...
That said, I think that it was daft of the organisers to assume that the audience of a yes Men premier was going to be all at that level! there were a lot of fierce-hearted and intelligent people in those cinemas that night, and they felt cheated, let down .. felt like their heroes of the hours before were asking them to step back from the brink of personal action, creativity and responsibility, rather than to push forward to ever braver, brainier, brighter actions for direct change.
so next time dear NGO people, please remember that the world needs more Yes People rather more than it needs more signatures on your petitions, and when you have guys like that in our country, please help them to inspire the few, as well as the many..
thanks!
zoe
James
16.08.2009 13:27
Ms Anne Thropy