Should we be worried about the BNP?
Andrew Bowman | 05.08.2009 22:02 | Analysis | Anti-racism
In years gone by, there’s been more interest amongst the British public in the Eurovision Song Contest than the European Parliamentary Elections. The election of Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons, leaders of the British National Party (BNP), has changed all that. How are these racist loons representing us? And how worried should we be?
For smaller political parties like the BNP, Euro elections are crucial. They don’t have a hope of getting elected to the national parliament, but the Euro elections use a different system which gives them a chance. The BNP launched their biggest ever election effort, and despite a lot of campaigning to stop the unthinkable happening, it happened.
Has everyone turned ultra-nationalist overnight? Not really. The BNP got fewer votes in the North West than at the last Euro elections in 2004, but fewer people voted overall and they scraped in with 8% of the total. Nationwide their vote grew by only 1%. The BNP aren’t as popular as the results might suggest, but the win will give them lots of publicity and prestige – it’s a big success for them.
How has this happened? Dig deeper than election maths and you hit the Labour Party. Labour was established at the turn of the 20th century to give voice in parliament to the working class majority and push for equality. Labour at the turn of the 21st Century is different. They’ve cuddled up to big business and started using the policies this demands. The consequences are clear. Data from the Department for Work and Pensions shows the gap between rich and poor in Britain is greater now than at any time since records began. Promises to halve child poverty by 2010 have failed miserably – nearly three million children still live on less than 60% of average income. The bank bailouts are among the largest transfers of wealth from poor to rich in human history – to make sure banks still turn profits, each person in the UK is liable for at least £20,000. Where was this money when it came to child poverty?
There’s no major party representing the interests of the low income majority any more. The BNP have taken aim at this political vacuum, targeting the poorest areas and scapegoating migrants for the problems people face.
But really, the BNP don’t feed off the despair of poorer people (most aren’t so easily fooled), they thrive off accepted mainstream prejudice. The BNP’s demonisation of ‘sponging illegal migrants’ wouldn’t look out of place at the Home Office. Their fearmongering about ‘Islamic extremists’ taking over isn’t far removed from that of the police (see page 15). And while the BNP talk about ‘cracking down’ on migrants and Muslims, Labour have been locking up and deporting thousands of vulnerable people (see page 7), and killing hundreds of thousands of Muslim people in Aghanistan and Iraq.
Labour’s response to the BNP’s success has been attempted blackmail: apparently either we put up with Labour, or face the BNP. The BNP are a growing threat, but for now they’re still nutters on the margins to most people – the real threat to our freedom and safety, right here and now, comes from ‘legitimate’ and ‘respectable’ politicians pushing schemes like the ID database (see page 8). The solutions to all these problems are clearly going to have to come from outside the status quo.
Has everyone turned ultra-nationalist overnight? Not really. The BNP got fewer votes in the North West than at the last Euro elections in 2004, but fewer people voted overall and they scraped in with 8% of the total. Nationwide their vote grew by only 1%. The BNP aren’t as popular as the results might suggest, but the win will give them lots of publicity and prestige – it’s a big success for them.
How has this happened? Dig deeper than election maths and you hit the Labour Party. Labour was established at the turn of the 20th century to give voice in parliament to the working class majority and push for equality. Labour at the turn of the 21st Century is different. They’ve cuddled up to big business and started using the policies this demands. The consequences are clear. Data from the Department for Work and Pensions shows the gap between rich and poor in Britain is greater now than at any time since records began. Promises to halve child poverty by 2010 have failed miserably – nearly three million children still live on less than 60% of average income. The bank bailouts are among the largest transfers of wealth from poor to rich in human history – to make sure banks still turn profits, each person in the UK is liable for at least £20,000. Where was this money when it came to child poverty?
There’s no major party representing the interests of the low income majority any more. The BNP have taken aim at this political vacuum, targeting the poorest areas and scapegoating migrants for the problems people face.
But really, the BNP don’t feed off the despair of poorer people (most aren’t so easily fooled), they thrive off accepted mainstream prejudice. The BNP’s demonisation of ‘sponging illegal migrants’ wouldn’t look out of place at the Home Office. Their fearmongering about ‘Islamic extremists’ taking over isn’t far removed from that of the police (see page 15). And while the BNP talk about ‘cracking down’ on migrants and Muslims, Labour have been locking up and deporting thousands of vulnerable people (see page 7), and killing hundreds of thousands of Muslim people in Aghanistan and Iraq.
Labour’s response to the BNP’s success has been attempted blackmail: apparently either we put up with Labour, or face the BNP. The BNP are a growing threat, but for now they’re still nutters on the margins to most people – the real threat to our freedom and safety, right here and now, comes from ‘legitimate’ and ‘respectable’ politicians pushing schemes like the ID database (see page 8). The solutions to all these problems are clearly going to have to come from outside the status quo.
Andrew Bowman
e-mail:
editor@themule.info
Homepage:
http://www.themule.info
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
Reality check
06.08.2009 11:02
Now, I know the truth isn’t always the most important of subjects for the looney left, but isn’t it about time you started to acknowledge that the BNP’s members, and the party itself, do have other areas of concern other than immigration, regardless of how repugnant most sane people find the idea of Britain’s population rising to 70 million, with all the problems that brings, in the near future because of immigration.
A recent discussion on their website about what New Labour will be remembered for highlighted many areas of concern and, surprise surprise, they weren’t all to do with immigrants: ID cards, GM food, lack of a decent public travel, the surveillance state, the selling off of our industries, the two illegal wars were just some of the suggestions made; yes, things you might be concerned about also!
You also suggest that the BNP are “still nutters on the margins to most people”. Well, nearly one million people voted for them, which is probably a few more than you’ll find supporting the Communist Party of Great Britain, with ‘nutter’ being a far kinder term than that which would normally be used to described your average far left, politically correct crank.
Finally just one more thing: though the dividing line between Labour and Tory has become ever-more blurry, it is fair to say that public opinion he shifted greatly towards the political right, though it is regretable that the sheeple, in the main, have been convinced that the answer to all our New Labour-created nightmares comes in the form of one David Cameron.
The amusing fact is, that by the time they wake up from THAT particular bad dream most of the young, idealistic Union-brainwashed students we find here will have left college, thrown out their masks and anarchist regallia, grown up, started work, and learnt just what it means to live in the real world, at which time their views on the BNP are likely to be very different from those they hold now.
mike
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments