Rally to defeat and isolate the fascist BNP in Sheffield
underclassrising.net | 28.06.2009 12:06 | Sheffield
The event was addressed by a range of speakers including:
John Campbell, Chair Sheffield UAF • Council Leader Paul Scriven • Paul Blomfield from the Labour Party • Cllr Jillian Creasey, Green Party • Regional NUT Secretary Ian Stevenson • Aisha 'Special K', Manager of Sheffield REC • Abdul Gooljar, Islamic Society of Britain • Cllr Mahroof Hussain from Rotherham • LGBT youth speaker • Sheffield University Students' Union and others.
John Campbell, Chair Sheffield UAF • Council Leader Paul Scriven • Paul Blomfield from the Labour Party • Cllr Jillian Creasey, Green Party • Regional NUT Secretary Ian Stevenson • Aisha 'Special K', Manager of Sheffield REC • Abdul Gooljar, Islamic Society of Britain • Cllr Mahroof Hussain from Rotherham • LGBT youth speaker • Sheffield University Students' Union and others.
The UAF leadership, namely one Weyman Bennett , has once again claimed that his organisation is the leading light in the tradition of militant anti-fascism in Britain today.
Just days after a UAF march led to some of the marchers succesfully chasing Griffin away from a press conference outside the Houses of Parliament, Bennett wasted no time in publicly declaring that the UAF stand firmly in the tradition that previously saw Moseley's Blackshirts smashed of the streets of London in the 1930's.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6488664.ece?Submitted=true
Bennett is an opportunist and an outright liar.
As a member of the Socialist Workers Party, who have a history of 'self declared leadership' of popular struggles this is hardly surprising.
While eggs may have been thrown last week, in itself hardly a 'militant' act of much pedigree but an act newsworthy enough to prompt a media frenzy, those involved were most likely not themselves members of the UAF, and the lack of media footage of Bennett himself getting 'stuck in' is noticeably absent as always.
The truth is that the SWP and all their political front groups have contributed far more to actually boosting BNP membership than they have to confronting it.
One of the leading groups in the 1980's physically confronting the BNP were Red Action, whose founding members were themselves originally from the SWP and their front group the Anti Nazi League.
These members were expelled for 'Squadism', or put simply, using violence and intimidation to break up meetings, marches and other gatherings of far right groups such as the National Front and the British Movement. The idea behind the tactic was to intimidate groups seen as fascist, without generating media publicity for the far right.
In short they were expelled for being part of the tradition of militant anti-fascism that Bennett is today claiming he and the UAF belong too.
Bennett is happy to co-operate with the state while declairing himself a militant. So much so that a UAF march in Leeds yesterday led by Bennett himself, was halted by the UAF on the request of the police, so that the first Orange Order parade in 40 years could go ahead on time in the same location.
https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/06/432227.html?c=on#c225807
Now that's Bennett's 'militant anti-fascism' for you!
There have been a number of attempts to downplay the scale of the British National Party’s success in the Euro elections last week. One of the main arguments which has been put forward is that while the BNP won two Euro seats, it’s number of votes actually dropped, proving that people are not turning to the far-right.
There’s a possiblity here of reading the results for the narrative we hope find, rather than facing the true extent of the challenge for the Left and the shape of likely developments to come. It’s correct we need to avoid hysteria, but at the same time we need good analysis to form effective strategies. Despite the risk of engaging in amateur psephology, and the danger of getting some of our calculations wrong, we want to try to break down some of the figures to find out if BNP support is static or if the party is still on the march. So, let’s look at the two seats where the BNP won.
First, the North West. In 2004, the BNP won 134,958 votes (6.4%) out of 2,115,163 votes cast. This time around, the BNP attained 132,094 votes (8%) out of 1,651,825. So here we have a 1.6% increase in vote percentage but a slight drop in support of 2,864 votes between the two elections. However, this must be set against a decline in turnout of more than 21%! In this context, the BNP’s total number of votes dropped about 2%.
Second, Yorkshire and the Humber. In 2004, the BNP won 126,538 votes (8%) out of 1,573,201 votes cast. This time around, the BNP attained 120,139 votes (9.8%) out of 1,226,180. Here we have a similar picture. The BNP’s share of the vote is up 1.8% but its absolute number of votes is down by 6,399. But again the turnout fell by more than 22% while the BNP’s total number of votes fell by just over 5%.
http://theleftluggage.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/amateur-psephology-and-the-rise-of-the-far-right/
Just days after a UAF march led to some of the marchers succesfully chasing Griffin away from a press conference outside the Houses of Parliament, Bennett wasted no time in publicly declaring that the UAF stand firmly in the tradition that previously saw Moseley's Blackshirts smashed of the streets of London in the 1930's.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6488664.ece?Submitted=true
Bennett is an opportunist and an outright liar.
As a member of the Socialist Workers Party, who have a history of 'self declared leadership' of popular struggles this is hardly surprising.
While eggs may have been thrown last week, in itself hardly a 'militant' act of much pedigree but an act newsworthy enough to prompt a media frenzy, those involved were most likely not themselves members of the UAF, and the lack of media footage of Bennett himself getting 'stuck in' is noticeably absent as always.
The truth is that the SWP and all their political front groups have contributed far more to actually boosting BNP membership than they have to confronting it.
One of the leading groups in the 1980's physically confronting the BNP were Red Action, whose founding members were themselves originally from the SWP and their front group the Anti Nazi League.
These members were expelled for 'Squadism', or put simply, using violence and intimidation to break up meetings, marches and other gatherings of far right groups such as the National Front and the British Movement. The idea behind the tactic was to intimidate groups seen as fascist, without generating media publicity for the far right.
In short they were expelled for being part of the tradition of militant anti-fascism that Bennett is today claiming he and the UAF belong too.
Bennett is happy to co-operate with the state while declairing himself a militant. So much so that a UAF march in Leeds yesterday led by Bennett himself, was halted by the UAF on the request of the police, so that the first Orange Order parade in 40 years could go ahead on time in the same location.
https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/06/432227.html?c=on#c225807
Now that's Bennett's 'militant anti-fascism' for you!
There have been a number of attempts to downplay the scale of the British National Party’s success in the Euro elections last week. One of the main arguments which has been put forward is that while the BNP won two Euro seats, it’s number of votes actually dropped, proving that people are not turning to the far-right.
There’s a possiblity here of reading the results for the narrative we hope find, rather than facing the true extent of the challenge for the Left and the shape of likely developments to come. It’s correct we need to avoid hysteria, but at the same time we need good analysis to form effective strategies. Despite the risk of engaging in amateur psephology, and the danger of getting some of our calculations wrong, we want to try to break down some of the figures to find out if BNP support is static or if the party is still on the march. So, let’s look at the two seats where the BNP won.
First, the North West. In 2004, the BNP won 134,958 votes (6.4%) out of 2,115,163 votes cast. This time around, the BNP attained 132,094 votes (8%) out of 1,651,825. So here we have a 1.6% increase in vote percentage but a slight drop in support of 2,864 votes between the two elections. However, this must be set against a decline in turnout of more than 21%! In this context, the BNP’s total number of votes dropped about 2%.
Second, Yorkshire and the Humber. In 2004, the BNP won 126,538 votes (8%) out of 1,573,201 votes cast. This time around, the BNP attained 120,139 votes (9.8%) out of 1,226,180. Here we have a similar picture. The BNP’s share of the vote is up 1.8% but its absolute number of votes is down by 6,399. But again the turnout fell by more than 22% while the BNP’s total number of votes fell by just over 5%.
http://theleftluggage.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/amateur-psephology-and-the-rise-of-the-far-right/
underclassrising.net
Comments
Hide the following 23 comments
pictures
28.06.2009 14:47
especially wearing t-shirts like that!
for fucks sake
Redwatch - who gives a f*ck
28.06.2009 15:30
Ted Chippington
nothing ever comes of red watch
28.06.2009 17:05
ballz
if you fear them?
28.06.2009 17:06
underclassrising.net
Red Watch....my arse
28.06.2009 17:12
......Seriously though i do not think anyone takes Red Watch seriously..
Lee
Nudge, nudge...
28.06.2009 19:29
Meantime in Doncaster, English Democrat Peter Davies has been elected on "policies" similar to the BNP's, except that he espouses English nationalism rather than British.. Most of these "policies" aren't within the mayor's powers or are otherwise impossible to realise, but this (very thick) bigot has acquired actual political power of a sort which is still in the BNP's dreams. A handful of right wing Tories eventually agreed to form his cabinet and no doubt they'll eventually educate him about what he can and can't do, enabling him to throw his weight around and attack all those who have been the targets of his ignorant and vituperative prejudice.
This bastard should be at least as important a target as the BNP. All out for Pride in Doncaster on August 8th! (whatever your sexuality). Davies' first move was to try to pull the poxy £3,000 funding the council gives Pride, before discovering it was already committed and he couldn't. Worse shit than that (Pride would have happened anyway) is no doubt to come.
Stroppyoldgit
Most the Redwatch photos...
28.06.2009 19:45
However I wouldn't publish photos like some of the above -- it can be intimidating and scary for people to see their photos on Redwatch and a bit more care should be taken to compose images that contain the backs of heads and not faces etc.
Snapper
Some people talk bollocks
28.06.2009 20:11
Sheffielders against the BNP
pointeless bullshiters
28.06.2009 20:18
underclassrising.net
Nice attitude
29.06.2009 10:17
So you'll photograph and publish pictures of any anti-fascist at any demo whether they like it or not, and if they ask you not to you'll give them a kicking.
How exactly are you different from the BNP please?
Anti
FUCK FASCISM, FUCK NAZISM AND FUCK THE BNP
29.06.2009 12:02
@ anti
pictures pictures..
29.06.2009 16:22
anti-fascist
Back to the Sheffield demo
29.06.2009 17:41
The SWP leadership in Sheffield were grassing up militant antifascists over 30 years ago, and time and again they have worked with the cops to prevent fascists getting a kicking. The SWP and all their front groups (including the UAF) are at best politically clueless, and at worst opportunist scum. Either way, no good antifascist should work with them. As for Weyman Bennett, the man is a total fucking idiot.
Antifascist
Make your mind up underclassrising
29.06.2009 17:46
> if people say hay man please no images cool no images if people say will you remove cool get me drift
I'm not sure I do get your drift, as you appear to be saying two completely different things. Mind you, your version of the English language is so far removed from everybody else's it's hardly surprising you can't express yourself properly. I mean, what the fuck does this mean?
> but what is being said here in context is a load of erm bullshit, and being told people like me aint wellcome to take images, in what context is the better than the BNP?
Please look up the meaning of the word 'context' and maybe one or two others and come back when you can at least string a sentence together FFS.
Anti
@ anti
29.06.2009 19:15
1. the parts of a written or spoken statement that precede or follow a specific word or passage, usually influencing its meaning or effect: You have misinterpreted my remark because you took it out of context.
2. the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event, situation, etc.
another one would be perdantic, or another one your not wellcome to take images because of whome you are etc, no shame in my anarchism..
@ anti
Pictures ?
29.06.2009 20:08
ex afa
Silly ultraleftist sectarianism alert
29.06.2009 20:16
rwillmsen@gmail.com
tshirt
29.06.2009 20:18
bb
Two seperate articles
30.06.2009 09:25
The first came from http://www.antifa.org.uk/nucleus3.32/nucleus332/index.php?itemid=169
Just a small thing, however I'm sure an Antifa article stuck togethor with an SWP one would cause some confession.
Regards
Mary
Mary Me
did you not read?
30.06.2009 10:07
underclassrising.net
fuck me
Fuck You
30.06.2009 10:19
And my name IS infact Mary.
Mary Me
White T-Shirts....my arse
30.06.2009 14:27
Tall isn't he....would you say coppers height?
Still what the hell.......Getting back to the Discussion although i do take a camera on demos and actions I personally do not see the point in taken pictures of us them yeh like that ginger twit.
...and Sheffield maybe a dump but it has been proven that thats where the working class live...ever been to Luton....now that is a dump.
Lee
Lee
Who needs the FIT?
30.06.2009 17:13
Fair enough you don't mind being on sites like redwatch but perhaps the people whose photos you needlessly chuck up on indymedia do.
Edelweiss Pirate