Skip to content or view screen version

Squatters in the JB Spray Building, prevent water company from cutting them off

Tash [alan lodge] | 17.06.2009 21:47 | Free Spaces | Social Struggles

Squatters in the JB Spray Building, [Russel Street, Nottingham, NG7 4FL] prevented Severn-Trent water from cutting them off.


























Squatters in the JB Spray Building, [Russell Street, Radford, Nottingham, NG7 4FL] prevented Severn-Trent water from cutting them off.

On tuesday afternoon [16th June] workmen were observed in the street outside, marking the road, ready to dig. They intended to cut the supply to the building, from out in the road. Folks then went out and sat in the road to prevent any work from being started. A few supporters were scrambled and arrived to help out. Some comfy chairs and tables were deployed. Tea, bread and jam supplied, and folks settled down.

The workmen found the whole issue amusing and took photos of each other, with the protesters :-) All were amused. They were all quite friendly gezzers, with no personal issues about the situation. The Advisory Service for Squatters were contacted for advice, and they were helpful in talking directly to water company managers. The situation lasted 2 - 3 hours, before they all went away. People are of course, on the look-out for their return.

The J B Spray Building has been re-squatted for the 4th time [in as many years], over the last few weeks.

This large industrial building need some care and attention. Each time people have been evicted by the owners obtaining a temporary possession order. Then, years go by, and on peoples' return, they discover that the building has fallen into yet greater dis-repair. The upper stories of the building are now so decrepid. For a grade 2 listed building, this is such a shame.

Imagine, if people had been previously left alone, then they would have helped in maintenance, improvements and given the building, and the street, some security.

Still, back in the real world ...... owners may say they are entitled to possession and all court has to do is establish that fact to grant orders. FOR FUCKS SAKE. where is the sense in it all?

The law supports this state of affairs and in my opinion completely lacks the social responsibility that communities should expect. Many squatters care about such places. There are so many empty properties. There is so much need for shelter. So many communities are blighted by the dereliction of their surroundings.

Hoarders blamed for home deficit
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4599359.stm

and all the law can think about is the owners possession.

Squatting is about direct action to take some direct responsibly for the improvement of community, and i wish them well.

In my experience of squatting, owners / authorities generally use electric and gas supply as a weapon to help them remove folks. Action on water is a new one on me. Water being so basic to human existence. The squatters handbook [p37] points out that where water is already connected: Section 1 Schedule 4A of the Water Industry Act 1999 makes it unlawful to disconnect "any dwelling which is occupied by a person as his only or principle home".

Water Industry Act 1999 - Schedule 4
 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/ukpga_19990009_en_4#sch1

Water Industry Act 1999
 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/ukpga_19990009_en_1

Check out the Nottingham City Council - Buildings at Risk Web Site
 http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/bar-nottingham.pdf

PDF / page 137 for details of the building.

Quote :: "Planning History
None. The owner is unwilling to sell the property and prefers community uses."

Yea, right!

So, there you have it.



Advisory Service for Squatters
Angel Alley,
84b Whitechapel High St,
London
E1 7QX
 advice@squatter.org.uk
 http://www.squatter.org.uk

Section 6
 http://indymedia.org.uk/images/2005/08/321123.jpg

Section 6 - Legal Warning [to print out]
 http://www.squatter.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=31

Section 6 - Legal Warning [download]  http://www.squatter.org.uk/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1


Earlier coverage of 'dis place

2006 Nottingham J B Spray Building Squatted / Evicted / Reoccupied
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2006/07/344121.html

2006 Nottingham Spray Building Squat, Radford
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2006/08/348297.html

2006 Nottingham Spray Squat Party 1 : Acoustic Gig
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2006/08/348318.html

2006 Nottingham Spray Building Squat : Nottingham County Court Appearance
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2006/08/348339.html

2006 Nottingham Spray Squat Party 2 : Acoustic Gig, with diner
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2006/08/348358.html

2007 Nottingham Spray Building 'spring into action' open for business
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2007/04/367164.html

2007 Nottingham Spring into Action :: Bicycle power for electric generation
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2007/04/367505.html

____________________________________________
ALAN LODGE
Photographer - Media: One Eye on the Road. Nottingham. UK
Email:  tash@indymedia.org
Member of the National Union of Journalists [No: 014345]
____________________________________________
"It is not enough to curse the darkness.
It is also necessary to light a lamp!!"
___________________________________________

Tash [alan lodge]
- e-mail: tash@indymedia.org

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

being awkward for the sake of being awkward?

17.06.2009 22:26

You dont look that bothered about them shutting the water off. It doesn't sound like it is necessary for you to be there.

Reds


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments