Report back from the Anarchist Movement Conference on Last Hours
Last Hours | 10.06.2009 21:47
Originally posted on http://www.lasthours.org.uk
The Anarchist Movement Conference took place recently. But did it fuel enthusiasm and inspiration or did it highlight old divides. Below is a report back from the two day event.
The Anarchist Movement Conference took place recently. But did it fuel enthusiasm and inspiration or did it highlight old divides. Below is a report back from the two day event.
Firstly, I must confess I went to the first Anarchist Movement Conference organisational meeting back in January or so and didn’t think much of it; although I believed a conference was important and useful, the first meeting seemed disorganised and without focus.
I then forgot about it - except seeing the occasional advert in the usual suspects of newspapers, magazines and websites, and a benefit gig organised by Class War - until the first day, Saturday 9th June. There had been an online application form, with entrance costing from £5 up, depending on your wage/generosity, which I had not managed to do, so I registered bright and early Saturday morning before being assigned a group and toddling off the welcome meeting.
Three things struck me about the people at the first meeting; the number, I think about 300 people took part; the lack of crusties, there were very few you would pick out a crowd as a probable anarchos; and the domination of white males, a theme I’ll return to later.
We had been divided into 15 groups and considerable effort had been put into making sure people from the same friendship groups and political coalitions were kept separate. This had the effect of throwing us all into conversation with people we would not normally associate with and avoided, presumably, everyone just agreeing with one another.
We then had 4 topics to cover
Movement
or why we aren’t one?
Restistance
or are we futile?
Class
or is there anybody out there?
Ideas into reality
and what’s in between?
We were given 10 hours, over Saturday and Sunday, to discuss these, or stray away from the topics if we felt it appropriate, and were instructed to organise the time and breaks ourselves, and just to be back to share what had happened 2pm Sunday afternoon. Because they are such large and important ideas each group had their own take on these questions; I won’t even begin to explain any of the conclusions or emphasis that we each put separately, needless to say they took in very different ideas from the destruction of gender-binary to post-Marxian views of class, but the minutes of all will be included in the post-conference report.
It’s fair to say that each group’s experience depended on the randomised make up, some were complicated by a couple of anti-organisationalists, who wanted to have no facilitator, and one group had 5 facilitators; none the less when everyone came to report back on Sunday afternoon, everyone seemed enthusiastic and optimistic. Uniquely for a conference, people were clamoring for more time, that it wasn’t long enough, and perhaps it could be extended to 3 days next year?
After all 15 groups had presented their conclusions and thoughts we were invaded. Six people dressed in black block attire walked in, explained they were ‘taking over’ and turned off the lights, an intentionally intimidating experience for everyone. A projector was set up, drum and bass kicked in and it was explained to us that this was a group of anarcho-feminists trying to raise awareness of sexism within the movement. Their aggressive and intimidating behaviour certainly got them more attention than a simple presentation would have done, but unfortunately some of the language they used made it seem like an attack on the conference specifically and it wasn’t until a discussion in the pub later that many of us realised it was a comment on the movement as a whole.
After 10 hours of discussion and a 2 hour report-back there was still enough energy for 6 groups to be set up to discuss specific proposals arising from the discussions immediately after the feedback session. Reports from which will be included in the massive ‘Anarchist Movement Report’ that is going to be published at the anarchist book-fair in October, which will also include the minutes from every group and organisational meeting.
I believe it was a much more positive experience than anyone dared hope for. The energy was sky-high the enthusiasm was there and people were much happier to concentrate on what united them than the petty differences that have separated revolutionary from revolutionary in the past. Roll on next year.
I then forgot about it - except seeing the occasional advert in the usual suspects of newspapers, magazines and websites, and a benefit gig organised by Class War - until the first day, Saturday 9th June. There had been an online application form, with entrance costing from £5 up, depending on your wage/generosity, which I had not managed to do, so I registered bright and early Saturday morning before being assigned a group and toddling off the welcome meeting.
Three things struck me about the people at the first meeting; the number, I think about 300 people took part; the lack of crusties, there were very few you would pick out a crowd as a probable anarchos; and the domination of white males, a theme I’ll return to later.
We had been divided into 15 groups and considerable effort had been put into making sure people from the same friendship groups and political coalitions were kept separate. This had the effect of throwing us all into conversation with people we would not normally associate with and avoided, presumably, everyone just agreeing with one another.
We then had 4 topics to cover
Movement
or why we aren’t one?
Restistance
or are we futile?
Class
or is there anybody out there?
Ideas into reality
and what’s in between?
We were given 10 hours, over Saturday and Sunday, to discuss these, or stray away from the topics if we felt it appropriate, and were instructed to organise the time and breaks ourselves, and just to be back to share what had happened 2pm Sunday afternoon. Because they are such large and important ideas each group had their own take on these questions; I won’t even begin to explain any of the conclusions or emphasis that we each put separately, needless to say they took in very different ideas from the destruction of gender-binary to post-Marxian views of class, but the minutes of all will be included in the post-conference report.
It’s fair to say that each group’s experience depended on the randomised make up, some were complicated by a couple of anti-organisationalists, who wanted to have no facilitator, and one group had 5 facilitators; none the less when everyone came to report back on Sunday afternoon, everyone seemed enthusiastic and optimistic. Uniquely for a conference, people were clamoring for more time, that it wasn’t long enough, and perhaps it could be extended to 3 days next year?
After all 15 groups had presented their conclusions and thoughts we were invaded. Six people dressed in black block attire walked in, explained they were ‘taking over’ and turned off the lights, an intentionally intimidating experience for everyone. A projector was set up, drum and bass kicked in and it was explained to us that this was a group of anarcho-feminists trying to raise awareness of sexism within the movement. Their aggressive and intimidating behaviour certainly got them more attention than a simple presentation would have done, but unfortunately some of the language they used made it seem like an attack on the conference specifically and it wasn’t until a discussion in the pub later that many of us realised it was a comment on the movement as a whole.
After 10 hours of discussion and a 2 hour report-back there was still enough energy for 6 groups to be set up to discuss specific proposals arising from the discussions immediately after the feedback session. Reports from which will be included in the massive ‘Anarchist Movement Report’ that is going to be published at the anarchist book-fair in October, which will also include the minutes from every group and organisational meeting.
I believe it was a much more positive experience than anyone dared hope for. The energy was sky-high the enthusiasm was there and people were much happier to concentrate on what united them than the petty differences that have separated revolutionary from revolutionary in the past. Roll on next year.
Last Hours
e-mail:
lasthourssw@mail.com
Homepage:
http://www.lasthours.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
sounds awesome
10.06.2009 22:08
datum
so
11.06.2009 00:07
whats the point of thinking up all these ideas when nothing i going to come of them, its great to get together and organise but really, its all talk and no action. thus pointless.
ballz
White activist community in London avoid issue of Tamil Genocide
11.06.2009 01:01
Meanwhile, all one white activist can say about the protest is criticise the wording on a slogan on a banner as not being wholly correct - namely "Stop State Fascism in Sri Lanka" in that only the state can be fascist and that it's not correct to say 'State Fascism'. I'd say that's exactly what's going on in Sri Lanka.
Whatever was discussed at the Anarchist Conference, I say it matters not a jot if none of you have ever been bothered to come down to Parliament Square. Did any of you even know within the activist bubble that 3 weekends ago, thousands of Tamils converged on Parliament Square to hold a vigil for the tens of thousands dead in Vanni with candles. There were so many candles, that the entirety of Parliament square was lit up in an unprecedented display of autonomy opposite Parliament (as police stood off, ...it was videoed).
meeting this Sunday - venue tbc. keep checking: http://www.act-now.info
from Act-Now
Although the war is now over there is still a large number of human rights
> violations taking place in the so-called detention camps in Sri Lanka and
> the suffering of the Tamil population continues. These detainees have been
> caught up in the conflict, traumatised, and still living in fear. Act Now is
> working with a number of human rights organisations and aid agencies and
> has a very good network of credible information. Through our sources we have
> heard extremely disturbing reports of rape, torture, extortion, murder and
> child recruitment by SL government backed paramilitary groups, occuring in
> the screening process and in the camps. Detainees are living in inadequate
> conditions, with a lack of medical treatment: the overcrowded camps and poor
> sanitation conditions are leading to the spread of diseases. Lack of food is
> leading to malnutrition and some cases of starvation. Aid agencies are not
> being given proper access and those that are, are not allowed to speak to
> the detained civilians.
Tim Martin - Act-Now
Other info of recent military offensive and human rights violations:
http://www.infobass.com/documents/5May-Tamil-Genocide-Vanni-Situation-Report.pdf
first they came for the Tamils...
Anarchists are not superheroes
11.06.2009 06:10
a
words lead to action
11.06.2009 06:21
but action doesn't 'just happen'
get real
datum
Dare to be Aware
11.06.2009 08:59
> oh, that's right is it? There absolutely nothing you can do in support of these people. Absolutely nothing? Anyone could write letters; it is the post-conflict humanitarian crisis which is most urgent right now and which needs peoples' attention, such as the turning away of the ship carrying aid for the Tamils a couple of days ago (they were not allowed to dock - Ref: http://vannimission.org/2009/06/05/press-release-5th-june/
06 June video interview with Kristjan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4UcKxF7rSY).
If you are aware that the Sri Lanka state's violence is a escalation but ultimately a continuation of what it has been doing since the 1950s, then you may also consider doing direct-action against Sri Lankan government interests, Boycott Sri Lankan products, the tourism industry, ..etc.
Also there is Heckler & Koch in Nottingham. H&K is an international arms company that makes submachine guns and assault rifles. Its international sales office is in Nottingham. H&K rifles and
submachine guns are used by the Sri Lankan army. Some of these rifles were supplied by Pakistan, to whom H&K had granted a production license. (See the Amnesty International report Undermining Global Security: the European Union’s arms exports.)
see also:
Britain sold arms despite Sri Lanka’s abuses – The Times
TamilNet, Tuesday, 02 June 2009
http://tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=29507
first they came for the Tamils
Response to Tamil comment
11.06.2009 12:02
Last Hours
e-mail: lasthourssw@mail.com
Homepage: http://www.lasthours.org.uk
@Last Hours
13.06.2009 23:21
"Movement - or why we aren’t one?
We are as much as a movement as we are allowed, as we are able to be. Cope with what you got, don't look far from safety for extra help. Now a days weneed wee groups, not a movement.
"Restistance - or are we futile?"
Futile resistance is smarter than pacifist resignation.
"Class - or is there anybody out there?"
MI5 are out there and they are generally well educated, certainly well-funded compared to anyone on our ranks.
"Ideas into reality - and what’s in between?"
We are at war. None of your questions have acknowledged this- for why? Well, I'll give you a serious answer. What is in between idea into reality is a bit of work, a bit of commitment and often a bit of bravery, a smattering of cunning and discipline.
These are meaningless questions though. Presumably they were just meaningless headlines for real arguments, but it would be better to either inform those of us who didn't attend what those arguments were, and who was making them. Whne you post here, even a comment, you should try to be the sort of journalist worth reading, the one that quotes sources.
If I read those questions I would assume I was at a Star Trek convention. Bland and vague - defensive. Your report makes me glad that I never went and I don't know if that was your intention. I'd be grateful if you'd like to file a more in depth report here.
Danny
great stuff
14.06.2009 22:15
Well maybe if we talk more, and actually agree on some things, then we'll be in a better state to actually *try* to stop genocide wherever it takes place. But I agree with the last poster, we can't, simply as anarchists, feel guilt for not having stopped it. I don't feel guilty for not having stopped the Iraq war, though I went out of my way to do it and ended up getting nicked by the pigs twice for that.
Anyway, report and forthcoming 'product' sounds excellent and I look forward to reading them.
Krop
@Danny
15.06.2009 00:45
Sorry I didn't actually write the report myself. If you have comments to make maybe the best thing to do would be to leave them on the last hours site ( http://www.lasthours.org.uk) where the author may respond. I for one would encourage debate on the topic.
I have my own opinions about the conference and this brief report back but don't feel the need to air them here.
Cheers
Tom - Last Hours
Homepage: http://www.lasthours.org.uk