No Pretence Statement
nopretence | 08.06.2009 23:29 | Gender | Social Struggles
Below is the statement that was handed out by the group of anarcha-feminists who took the stage at the anarchist conference to talk about sexism in the movement and in capitalist society.
We have taken this space and projected this short film to show how we see sexism in ‘the movement’ and sexism in capitalist society. We have covered our faces in the same way we might do against the state and its agents – inspired by the tradition of our militant sisters who took back male-dominated stages, and political spaces.
We expect hostility, intimidation and greater surveillance after our action. Covering up makes it easier to communicate. And we know that our message is much bigger than the messenger herself.
The following text is our response to the four themes of the conference.
MOVEMENT or why we aren’t one
No matter how much we aspire to be ‘self-critical’ there is a clear lack of theorising and concrete action around sexism, homophobia and racism in the anarchist movement. We do not feel that the content and structure of the conference deal with gender and we’re tired of asking for space – we’re taking it ourselves.
You want to talk about history? Let’s stop pretending that feminism is a short blip in the history of political struggles. The feminism you know may be the one that has been dominated by white middle-class liberal politics – NOT the struggles and pockets of revolutionary resistance missing from our political pamphlets and ‘independent’ media. The feminism of Comandanta Yolanda, of bell hooks, of Anzaldua, of Mbuya Nehanda, of Angela Davis, of Rote Zora, of Mujeres Libres…
CLASS or is anybody out there?
We are all oppressed by the class system, but there is nobody ‘out there’ who isn’t also oppressed by white supremacy, imperialism, heterosexism, patriarchy, ableism, ageism…Pretending these systems don’t exist or can be subsumed into capitalist oppression, doesn’t deal with the problem, it just silences those people most oppressed by them, and allows for the continuing domination of these systems over our lives.
We are tired of being told that anarchists don’t need to be feminists, because ‘anarchism has feminism covered’. This is just a convenient way of forgetting the reality of gender oppression, and so ignoring the specifics of the struggle against it.
RESISTANCE or are we futile?
If the anarchist movement doesn’t recognize the power structures it reproduces, its resistance will be futile. For as well as fighting sexism ‘out there’ we must fight sexism ‘in here’ and stop pretending that oppressive systems disappear at the door of the squat or the social centre. Only a movement that understands and fights its own contradictions can provide fertile ground for real and effective resistance.
Ask yourselves this – do you believe sexism exists within the movement? When a woman comrade says she’s experienced sexual abuse or assault from a male comrade – what do you think? That it’s an individual or an isolated case? Or that it can happen – and disproportionately to women – because there is a system which allows it to develop and gives it life? Can we honestly say that our own autonomous spaces do not play a part in upholding this system?
Ask yourselves this – Why do fewer women speak in meetings? Because they think less? What is the gender of the factory worker? Why do more women do the washing up and run creches at meetings/events? What is the gender of the carer at home?
Now tell us if you believe sexism exists: tell us why men rape; why more women are battered than men; why more women are used by the state to do free and unwaged work. Tell us – are you a feminist?
We believe that in the anarchist movement, the strongest evidence of sexism lies in the choice we’re told to make between ‘unity’ and what-they-call ‘separatism’, between fighting the state and fighting sexism. Fuck that! We refuse to be seen as stereotypes of ‘feminists’ you can consume – like fucking merchandise in the capitalist workplace.
IDEAS INTO REALITY and what’s in between?
There will be no future for the anarchist movement if it doesn’t also identify as an anarcha-feminist movement. Anarcha-feminist organisational structures must exist within the movement to make anarcha-feminism an integral part of it. And you don’t need to identify as a woman to be an anarcha-feminist – every anarchist should be able to participate in the struggle against sexism.
The state’s incursion into our private lives and the relationship between sexuality and productivity from which it profits affects people of all genders. The gender binary system violently allocates us roles on the basis of our anatomy. A refusal to accept even these basic precepts will be a great hindrance to the movement.
You ask, ‘Can we find common cause despite our differences?’. We will only find common cause if we recognize that our differences are structured by numerous oppressive systems, and together fight to end each of these systems, wherever we find them.
Our feminisms must be plural, they must be anti-capitalist, anti-racist, anti-homophobic. Our inspiration must come from the actions of feminists who have helped self-identified women reach revolutionary consciousness.
Our feminisms must be revolutionary.
Final word
You can pretend we didn’t come here, pretend nothing was said.
You can purposefully misunderstand us.
Or you can ask yourselves why we came, what we meant, and whether we’ll come back again.
We expect hostility, intimidation and greater surveillance after our action. Covering up makes it easier to communicate. And we know that our message is much bigger than the messenger herself.
The following text is our response to the four themes of the conference.
MOVEMENT or why we aren’t one
No matter how much we aspire to be ‘self-critical’ there is a clear lack of theorising and concrete action around sexism, homophobia and racism in the anarchist movement. We do not feel that the content and structure of the conference deal with gender and we’re tired of asking for space – we’re taking it ourselves.
You want to talk about history? Let’s stop pretending that feminism is a short blip in the history of political struggles. The feminism you know may be the one that has been dominated by white middle-class liberal politics – NOT the struggles and pockets of revolutionary resistance missing from our political pamphlets and ‘independent’ media. The feminism of Comandanta Yolanda, of bell hooks, of Anzaldua, of Mbuya Nehanda, of Angela Davis, of Rote Zora, of Mujeres Libres…
CLASS or is anybody out there?
We are all oppressed by the class system, but there is nobody ‘out there’ who isn’t also oppressed by white supremacy, imperialism, heterosexism, patriarchy, ableism, ageism…Pretending these systems don’t exist or can be subsumed into capitalist oppression, doesn’t deal with the problem, it just silences those people most oppressed by them, and allows for the continuing domination of these systems over our lives.
We are tired of being told that anarchists don’t need to be feminists, because ‘anarchism has feminism covered’. This is just a convenient way of forgetting the reality of gender oppression, and so ignoring the specifics of the struggle against it.
RESISTANCE or are we futile?
If the anarchist movement doesn’t recognize the power structures it reproduces, its resistance will be futile. For as well as fighting sexism ‘out there’ we must fight sexism ‘in here’ and stop pretending that oppressive systems disappear at the door of the squat or the social centre. Only a movement that understands and fights its own contradictions can provide fertile ground for real and effective resistance.
Ask yourselves this – do you believe sexism exists within the movement? When a woman comrade says she’s experienced sexual abuse or assault from a male comrade – what do you think? That it’s an individual or an isolated case? Or that it can happen – and disproportionately to women – because there is a system which allows it to develop and gives it life? Can we honestly say that our own autonomous spaces do not play a part in upholding this system?
Ask yourselves this – Why do fewer women speak in meetings? Because they think less? What is the gender of the factory worker? Why do more women do the washing up and run creches at meetings/events? What is the gender of the carer at home?
Now tell us if you believe sexism exists: tell us why men rape; why more women are battered than men; why more women are used by the state to do free and unwaged work. Tell us – are you a feminist?
We believe that in the anarchist movement, the strongest evidence of sexism lies in the choice we’re told to make between ‘unity’ and what-they-call ‘separatism’, between fighting the state and fighting sexism. Fuck that! We refuse to be seen as stereotypes of ‘feminists’ you can consume – like fucking merchandise in the capitalist workplace.
IDEAS INTO REALITY and what’s in between?
There will be no future for the anarchist movement if it doesn’t also identify as an anarcha-feminist movement. Anarcha-feminist organisational structures must exist within the movement to make anarcha-feminism an integral part of it. And you don’t need to identify as a woman to be an anarcha-feminist – every anarchist should be able to participate in the struggle against sexism.
The state’s incursion into our private lives and the relationship between sexuality and productivity from which it profits affects people of all genders. The gender binary system violently allocates us roles on the basis of our anatomy. A refusal to accept even these basic precepts will be a great hindrance to the movement.
You ask, ‘Can we find common cause despite our differences?’. We will only find common cause if we recognize that our differences are structured by numerous oppressive systems, and together fight to end each of these systems, wherever we find them.
Our feminisms must be plural, they must be anti-capitalist, anti-racist, anti-homophobic. Our inspiration must come from the actions of feminists who have helped self-identified women reach revolutionary consciousness.
Our feminisms must be revolutionary.
Final word
You can pretend we didn’t come here, pretend nothing was said.
You can purposefully misunderstand us.
Or you can ask yourselves why we came, what we meant, and whether we’ll come back again.
nopretence
e-mail:
nopretence@riseup.net
Homepage:
http://www.nopretence.wordpress.com
Comments
Hide the following 15 comments
feminism vs anarchism...what are you talking about?
09.06.2009 11:29
let me know.............
leds
e-mail: cophaternumber1@live.com
missing the point
09.06.2009 14:06
But in this case it was a group of anarchists, who have direct experience of sexism in the movement, who staged the intervention to draw attention to the fact that it does exist in the movement, and therefore that it needs to be dealt with as an issue by the movement.
You say that the movement isn't inherently sexist, but I fail to see how that invalidates the points that the intervention sought to make.
anarchist man
"You can pretend we didn’t come here, pretend nothing was said."... OR!!
09.06.2009 17:54
Go on then, tell the scene what it should do:
[this space left intentionally blank]
Anarchist Communist
I think you're missing the point
09.06.2009 18:32
Well to be honest, the meetings I have been to, it's been equally distributed (speech between genders).
If there's less women at meetings, I don't think that is a repressive move by male anarchists at all. If anything, you women should spread the word as equally as the men do. It's not a male-dominated fault that women don't show.
'''''''Because they think less?''''''''''
Not at all. Biologically, women are emotionally driven, as men are logic driven, but I wouldn't say women 'think' less at all. If anything, they probably think more.
'''''''''What is the gender of the factory worker?''''''''''
This is a completely ridiculous point. The man, since he stepped foot on the earth has always done more physical work than the woman, always. That's to do with genetic/muscular/bone structure etc, again not because the man says 'No woman, you cannot' but because it is natural for the man to be 'the worker/hunter/provider' if the family is to survive.
''''''Why do more women do the washing up and run creches at meetings/events?''''''''
Because as it happens, I would say the 'motherly' instinct, has, and always will be the healthy option for the child, instead of the man, who is (usually, not always) providing for the family.
If the child in the creche is in question, then I would say it is better to have women running it then men, but it doesn't mean there can't be a switch over, or a rota or whatever.
''''''''''''' What is the gender of the carer at home?''''''''''''''' I know many guys that have to care for people at their home, but again, the woman is more hospitable than the man, that's the way it has been since pretty much the beginning of human existence.
I really think you are missing the point. And if you want to see more 'feminist' action in meetings and the MOVEMENT etc, well, don't blame it on the male-lot as 'pushing you aside'.
Last point, as for 'spot the woman' in the picture of the G2O bank of Scotland smashing the windows, realistically, in terms of physical ability over a majority, who is more likely to be able to smash sh*t up, the man or the woman? That's not a sexist point by the way, but it does have a logical answer.
Oh, and if you hadn't guessed, I am an anarchist, and a male.
anarkissed
@ Anarchist communist
09.06.2009 18:48
see here http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/06/431963.html?c=on#c225445
and here http://london.indymedia.org.uk/articles/1539
and i for one think it was a brilliant film and a brilliant action. i wish i'd been there.
anarchafeminist who has experienced plenty of sexism in the anarchist movement
@ anarkissed
09.06.2009 18:54
you are the proof for all those doubters out there that it is possible to be an anarchist, a sexist and a complete bloody idiot all at the same time!
say no more
the above comment
09.06.2009 19:11
In my experience, many women are more than able and confident to be part of the "black bloc" as men.
I don't think "violence" is the sole preserve of men and a large number of men are victims of domestic violence. You may think that such incidents deserver a greater understanding of the context i.e. women are the actual "victims" fighting back but no one should ignore that the power balance in relationships are not always in a mans favour - the same goes for same sex relationships (in terms of the potential for abuse and domestic violence).
I do support the intervention, because it put people into an comfortable situation - including myself as I was the one facilitating the next part of the plenary! - but to be honest it atleast shows the frustration and anger that women have who are involved in radical movements. I would say though that there was a tone in the statement and video that no one challenges sexism and gender oppression in that movement. People do and have done so, men and women, many people discussed these issues during the two days and so some parts of the statement did suggest that taking over the stage is the ONLY way women can bring these issues to the centre. I found that patronising as it assumed that these issues weren't discussed by women and men at the conference or generally.
As for where this discussion can be taken, I think this has to be a self-critical process and within something we all do. There are elements of which I find not very useful - like stereotyping white men. Just because society is predominantly based on white men owning the means of production there are issues of class subjugation and domination that play a massive factor in undermining any "male conspiracy". There are some places in London (and across the UK) where if you are white and working class the idea of white privilege doesn't exist. If anything, you can be excluded, written off even beaten up for being white -- trust me I talk from personal experience.
A
wrong link
09.06.2009 19:44
anarchafeminist who has experienced plenty of sexism in the anarchist movement
rbs
09.06.2009 19:55
twosup
@ twosup
09.06.2009 20:20
The video isnt saying that there are no women in anarchist activism, but just that there are a lot more men. The nopretence activist are anarchists who are women, they know that there are women in the movement, they are women in the movement. the video is about sexism, gender inequalities and the under-representation of women in mainstream society and in anarchist organising. Nobody has been written out of history!
some people are so thick
some people certainly are
09.06.2009 20:56
on the point of people being written out of history, it's been mentioned here and on the no pretence blog that women who spoke at at least one of the rallies on the video have been omitted from the film. they have been written out of the no pretence version of events, and for no good reason i can see. the ratio of men to women within the movement has been cause for comment, and concern, on a number of occasions and it isn't the sort of news you seem to think it is. if no pretence wanted to see a debate about their intervention, it is necessarily going to include a debate about their video, the video they presented as a major part of their message to the conference. and where it doesn't reflect the reality of events, where for example, there were if not equal numbers of men and women out on 1 april not far off (sorry, i didn't think to count on the day), then it's only fair to point that out.
on the substantive issue no pretence raise, yes, there is sexism in the movement, and yes it needs to be countered when it's raised. but where there were two days of discussion by many of the most active people in the movement in which this could have been raised and positive proposals for a solution reached, it's depressing that what happens is an exchange of comments on the internet where people unhappy with aspects of the no pretence action are called sexist.
twosup
justme
09.06.2009 21:13
what they have done is raise questions - to me that's fundamental to anarchism, its all about the questions - and i'm really glad.
some of the posters here have done nothing but prove to me over and over how much feminist thought is lacking within the brains of many. above this comment is one that claims women are biologically emotional where men are rational, for example! utter bollox that is almost funny its so messed-up. i couldn't bear to read the rest of that comment to be honest he has nothing to say to me its clear.
what i would like to see some debate about is why there is this percieved lack of women's voices in the so-called movement.
to me it seems likely that that is due to many women being responsible for child-care, as well as care of the elderly, and women being on lower wages on average (therefore often having to work longer hours) as well as our socialisation against having opinions let alone stating them.
the cop in our brain is ever powerful, and we (most of us) were raised very differently to the men we stand alongside.
as women and as feminists we have grappled to overcome this stuff, with varying degrees of success. however, what are anarchist men actively doing to overcome their socialisation, or to assist us in finding our voices?
at the moment it feels like survival of the fittest, those who are confident and articulate get heard, and those who aren't don't.
how can we structure our meetings and gatherings to include all those who find it harder to express themselves in public, for the myriad of reasons that are real for so many of us? this encompasses queers, people with disabilities, people of different cultures and classes...
having said that i don't think sexism in the movement is only evidenced by who speaks at meetings (or more importantly who doesn't). i think that matters, and i think we do have to face the facts that the movement is a heterosexual white male cultural space which needs to change on many levels, but i think there are other issues at play too.
its not enough to not be sexist, its necessary to be actively anti-sexist, in your actions words and thoughts. there is no fence to sit on, either you support the status quo by doing nothing, or you start to join the struggle(s).
the personal is political and you are never "off-duty" because you are never not in the patriarchy.
thoughts
Ostriches get your heads out the sand
10.06.2009 03:21
You can try and divert attention away from the issue by criticising the details of how this action was carried out, but you're just missing the point. 'Twosup', the fact that you're trying to wriggle out of addressing it is evidenced by your nit-picking.
Women who are assualted, talked down to, ignored, sidelined into doing childcare and cooking, are just going to get pissed off and leave if people can't even take this stuff on board. The total inability to even grapple with this by some of the respondents above just highlights how much it needs to be dealt with - we can stay an island of white, first-world, male-dominated activists, alienating anyone who doesn't fit into that scene, or we can grow and build a real movement. I don't see why anyone other than those involved already would take the former seriously.
spider
Quick question
11.06.2009 10:09
Confused
Good questions... a quick answer... and another question...
11.06.2009 10:58
A more interesting question to me at least is why the old Earth First!/eco-anarcho activist/Climate Change scenes manage to have a much better balance towards gender equality than the 'traditional' anarchist scene does.
A tendency towards action maybe rather than meetings/talking?
Have some mixed feelings about the intervention and some of the politics behind it though... although people picking holes in the timing of it/wearing of masks/video imagery etc. misses some more important points IMHO...
Jay