Remember the animals, letter to Gordon Brown
Lynn Sawyer | 08.06.2009 11:36 | Animal Liberation
As the politicians and old soldiers gathered in France on the 65th anniversay of the Normandy landings there was one group not being remembered, the animals who made a contribution to the liberation of Europe. Animals who were in effect slave labour (they were forced to go and had no choice about their involvement).
No politican made mention of the horses, dogs and pigeons who made a vital contribution and died for the benefit of others, I have today sent a letter to Gordon Brown to remind him and obtain public recogntion of the role together with an apology for thier forced involvement.
No politican made mention of the horses, dogs and pigeons who made a vital contribution and died for the benefit of others, I have today sent a letter to Gordon Brown to remind him and obtain public recogntion of the role together with an apology for thier forced involvement.
Lynn Sawyer
Comments
Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments
What about the attack dogs?
08.06.2009 12:12
No effort will be made to re-habilitate them. These dogs are often procured from Dog shelters,
We should be concentrating on these serving dogs rather than worrying about rememberance.
GuardDog
Nutter alert
08.06.2009 12:28
Yeah right
Still continuing
08.06.2009 12:51
There is simply no excuse for anybody still to be eating or drinking animal products or flesh, it is inexcusable. Anybody who does so is comparble to the Nazis in my opinion.
Until all are free
Normandy Invasion
08.06.2009 12:56
Street Pete
Why not reperations ?
08.06.2009 13:00
Anybody fancy a case to the EU on this ?
Street Lawyer
Why not reperations ?
08.06.2009 13:01
Anybody fancy a case to the EU on this ?
Street Lawyer
Sickening site
08.06.2009 13:11
The entire facade was simply a way of pre-positioning US troops for an invasion of the Soviet Union
Comrade
Seeing the bigger picture
08.06.2009 14:17
In case you missed it the BNP were elected to the European Parliment a couple of days ago. The economy of the UK is in landslide and crime is at an all time high do you really think anybody gives a toss about a few dead dogs from 60 odd years ago ?
Its no wonder the animal rights movement has problems with its credibility sometimes when posts like this are on Indymedia.
See the big picture Lynn and stop focusing on animals all the time.
Fruitcake alert
Slaughter of the innocents
08.06.2009 14:44
Yes, that's right, they should be absolutely remembered, but most folk don't care a cuss that those poor innocent souls suffered. For poxed up wars they didn't create! Using animals for warfare is really evil!
Shitbags moan about the ferral pigeons being fed, but pigeons saved many lives during wars by carrying vital coded messages for the military. The only medal some arseholes are willing to give them is one of starvation, plus sheer persecution and non-thanks!
Francis H. Giles
Horses, dogs and pigeons
08.06.2009 15:30
The allies probably did use dogs, though not on the front line. There is a famous photograph of a naval beachmaster with a dog on the beaches of Normandy, he has featured in films too, but it was his pet dog. Any dogs would have been pets and were more likely to have been on ships than with army units, at least the front line army units.
I imagine the allies had a few pigeons, for use in case communications broke down totally, but I don't know if any were taken ashore.
A N Other
Yes what about the animals.
08.06.2009 18:59
Shame on you animal murderer!!!
Wiki
apology
08.06.2009 19:04
You started it.
stapph
Yes and no
08.06.2009 22:03
The horses and pigeons yes. The dogs, well that's more problematical.
There two senses in which true. If the person didn't take the dog along into battle, the dog wouldn't be there. That's one sense. The other is embedded in the very nature of the dog as a "pack predator" who instead of being a canid in the wild (whose pack mates would be other canids) has identified it's humans as its pack.
Of that sense did you mean because "instinct" (interinsic proper responses of a dog) that the dog wasn't choosing? Because the dog didn't know and wasn't thinking about the consequences? Of course in some sense the dog IS "choosing" --- if you are walking down the street with your dog and somebody jumps you perhaps a "yapper" chooses to just bark instead of suicidally joining the fray in "common pack defense" -- and sometimes an unusually timid larger dog will do likewise. But NORMALLY the dog would "choose" to go with its person and if it comes to a fight, to fight alongside.
PLEASE -- that's not intended as in any way, shape, or form intended as a justification of the use of dogs in war. Perhaps precisely because we know the consequences and they don't. But please, the dog isn't being a "slave", a machine with no will of its own. In other words, all I am objecting to here is disrespect being shown to the dogs, in this case acting according to their natures (as a "good pack member" should).
MDN
I have not written this post
09.06.2009 16:32
My grandfather was one of the first soldiers on the Normandy beaches, the first thing that happened was that he was splattered with his best friends guts. I am not impressed by someone trying to mislead others by pretending to be me especially concerning D day which haunted my grandad until he died.
Whoever you are maybe use your own name next time unless we share the same name of course!
Lynn sawyer
?
09.06.2009 16:43
Er... which liberating troops were conscipts? Are you getting the wars in Afgan mixed up, easy to do.
As for Brown trying to be nice to animals, of course, he has to be....his government is full of sheep.
Whats the matter ALFie?
Thanx for the memories
13.06.2009 15:08
jimbo purser
Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments