Skip to content or view screen version

A vote for the BNP is not a protest vote … it’s a vote for fascism

Info | 31.05.2009 11:17 | World

The BNP is the most successful fascist/nationalistic organisation in the United kingdom’s history. How should we confront this threat?


The British national party led by its current leader Nick Griffin are the most successful fascist group this country has ever known. As of today it has around 50 odd county/borough/parish councillors in town halls in places like Burnley, Stoke on trent etc. It has around 10,000 members though only a few thousand are politically active. It also has an elected GLA member in London Richard barnbrook, and are possibly on the verge of winning seats in the European elections. Compare this with the old National front of the 1970’s/1980’s it is easy to see why they are easily the most successful fascist party in britain ever. The reasons for this are varied but include:

The Tory party move to the centre of british politics especialy under Cameron

The Labour party utter contempt for the Working Class especially the white working class.

The improvement in the BNP organisation and image

The utter complacent attitude of the media

The Left and anarchist being in utter denial

Lack of credible fascist rivals

Political climate regarding concerns over imigration, asylum seekers, terrorism
A vote for the BNP is not a protest vote … it’s a vote for fascism

So what should we do and not do?

Give the appaling situation that anti fascists find themselves in it would be advisable if the left/anarchist drop the nazi stereotyping of the BNP. The BNP is not in whole a Nazi party it is a postmodern fascist party. The BNP have jewish people in the party for a start plus they dont wear swastikas and jack boots regardless of what certain individuals in that party do in private and may still think in private. Fascism is a mutating ideology and we have to recognise that they have changed in that respect.

We need to take the BNP seriously and not keep assuming that they will fade away and then the left will have its time, aka 1933 germany.

We also need to exploit the tensions that undoubtedly exist in the BNP between the postmodern fascists and the rump nuckleheads who still hang on in there.

We need to exploit the tensions between those who still believe in the streets approach to building the BNP and those who wish to focus on electoral methods

We need to focus on the BNP’s populist and contradictory message. As it tries to build the coalition of the white working class, the Tory middle class and petit bourgeoisie, those contradictions will emerge even more clearly. Like all fascists they will find it hard to reconcile policies which please both classes.

We also need to reject any co-operation with the Searchlight magazine a magazine with dubious links to the state. Any co-operation with them is not in the interests of the left/anarchists in general despite its appearance as an anti fascist magazine. The left does not require help from the british state to defeat fascism. Indeed the state regard the left and the right as essentially the same.

Finally opposition to fascism is not enough we need to outline a new vision of how society should look based on decentralisation and enpowering working class communities written of by the chattering PC middle classes and the rotten stinking Labour party.

The BNP is growing and spreading its poisonous message. The current tactics on how to deal with them are clearly not working. We need new Militant ideas such as ANTIFA not picnics in the park with dolly mixtures and fizzy pop and listening to Middle Class Wankers like pete doherty. Some of the ideas outlined above have a better chance of suceeding than the UAF strategy of picnics in the park. The situation is serious and there are no easy answers to this problem but we need to do something urgently before it is too late.

We would like to remind those supporters of Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems in their hasty condemnation of supporters of the BNP that THEY themselves have little to boast about, in particular New Labour.

Let’s remember that it is Labour that has taken us into TWO illegal wars, based upon a deliberate LIE, and which has seen the deaths of 100,000 plus Iraqis, and many of our own service men and women. They have then tried to keep the whole sorry affair under wraps. These wars are costing us billions every year – that’s OUR money.

It was Labour that promised us a referendum on the EU; another deliberate LIE – there was never any intention of allowing us the opportunity to withdraw from the EU superstate which currently makes over 70% of our laws.

It was Labour MPs that have been the most enthusiastic beneficiaries of the allowances system, ripping off the tax payer to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds for everything from plasma TVs to porn films.

It has been Labour that has flooded the country with immigrants, allowing them to undercut British workers for jobs, and seemingly throwing money at them whilst our pensioners die through lack of heating in winter. To get us to accept this we have been force-fed the ‘Political Correctness’ LIE – anyone objecting is a racist.

It is Labour that seeks, for political gain, to destroy our precious green belt by allowing tens of thousands of houses to be built on our last remnants of countryside.

It is Labour that seeks to poison our water with the highly toxic fluoride. Whether this is to appease the aluminium and fertiliser industries or whether it is to bring about our dumbing down through its effects on the central nervous system, is at present a moot point.

And it is Labour that is in the process of turning our country into the most surveyed police state in history through CCTV cameras on every street corner, vehicle number plate recognition technology, compulsory ID cards, the saving of innocent persons’ DNA , and the recording of every website visited, every phone call made, and every text message sent. Truly frightening, yet mind boggling that anyone could vote for such criminals.

Oh yes, all of you who have voted Labour over the past twelve years have nothing to be proud of we can assure you, whilst those who voted for the other of the big three parties who might currently be sitting high in their ivory towers should remember that all this has been brought in with barely a word of opposition.

The BNP has now political influence, power or broad support. They are as about likely to gain some as the SWP or Greens. There are bigger problems that need attention and energy.

They’re going to win seats in the European parliament, which will put them on the Euro $$$ gravy train providing them with more opportunities to spread their bile. Take your head out of that bucket and understand that these fuckers are a threat for all the reasons in Simon’s post, then we can work towards defeating them.

• The BNP has avoided paying income tax and National Insurance contributions by pretending that some staff were self-employed.

• Their 2007 party accounts failed their audit as several thousand pounds of expenditure was not properly recorded.

The EU elections offer the BNP a gravy train of over £2 million—how much will go to line their own pockets?

With friends like these…

• The BNP has recently welcomed the support of Dr Sean Gabb, a man who hasargued that there shouldn’t be any laws against the possession of child porn.

• BNP members Ian Hindle and David Wells were jailed for child sex offences in 2008.

• BNP leader Nick Griffin has strong links with David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, as well as many other neo-nazi groups around the world.
BNP leader, Nick Griffin, cosying up with officials from Hungarian fascist party, Jobbik. The party is strongly anti-Jewish and organises a private army of uniformed fascists.BNP leader, Nick Griffin, cosying up with officials from Hungarian fascist party, Jobbik. The party is strongly anti-Jewish and organises a private army of uniformed fascists.

All politicians are scum
We all know politicians can’t be trusted, they’re a bunch of lying hypocrites who just want to get their greedy snouts in the trough at Westminster and Brussels and gorge themselves at our expense. Now we’re all being made to pay the price for the mess they and their fat-cat banker friends have made. People are right to be angry, the system is rotten to the core, why should we vote for any of these scum?!
But whilst support for the mainstream parties seems virtually non-existent, one party is busy making gains—the BNP, a fascist organisation busy ‘rebranding’ themselves, hiding their jackboots, swastika armbands and thuggish past under suits and ties so that they can get their snouts in the trough too.

The BNP — A party on the take
• In Barking & Dagenham, seven BNP councillors attended only 27% of meetings—but each still pocketed the full £9,810 allowance.
• One BNP councillor in Sandwell attended no meetings at all for six months and was booted off the council—but he still took his allowance.

And in the BNP’s own words…


“What we urgently need, and must have to survive, is very much less democracy, a very much smaller, more carefully selected and more intelligent electorate … Granting a vote to each and every one of the natives of Britain was madness … lunacy could hardly go further!” (Internal BNP document)

For fascists like the BNP, any form of democracy is a hated interference in their running of society. So when the BNP say they want your vote that is exactly what they mean. Their eventual aim is to deny you any say or representation. We fully understand why working class communities feel abandoned by politicians. But a vote for the BNP is not a ‘protest vote’ – it is a vote for fascism!

Info

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

BNP fear factor.

31.05.2009 13:51

"We need to exploit the tensions between those who still believe in the streets approach to building the BNP and those who wish to focus on electoral methods"

What utter bollocks is this?

Who are you and why are you trying to make the BNP out to be more than they are?

The BNP are marginal, uninfluential, utterly unsupported by any competent political body and not about to make any headway at all in this election or any other.

Why don't you go back to your Nu labour handler and tell them this whole BNP tactic won't work. The electorate won't buy it. You'll have to come up with some other fear tactic to save your sorry, corrupt, parasitic arse.

If you don't vote Labour that DOES NOT mean the BNP will get in.

Stop trying to bully indymedia's readership into voting for who you want them to vote for. Prat!

No No


Please....

31.05.2009 13:56

Whatever ones think about the the BNP, we must recognize the fact that they are 1) far better organized than whatever is left of the Left in Britain 2) they have developed strategic, flexible and adaptable political strategies in their appeal to the voter in the UK. On the other hand this appeal might also have more to do with a profound lack of organized mobility and search for a basic commonality between those on the Left. I know such latter views are and generally always have been part of an anarchist critique of the constitutional Left, and I think they are even more valid in these times, but I was wondering how socialists and communists view these matters, especially since all their energies seem to be directed at bitching about other parties and their growing memberships all the while they lack any sort of comprehensive and democratic vision directed at creating alternatives for not just the 'working class' but everyone who is fucked by capitalism.

Jason

jason


more thoughts...long post

01.06.2009 10:00

"I was wondering how socialists and communists view these matters, especially since all their energies seem to be directed at bitching about other parties and their growing memberships all the while they lack any sort of comprehensive and democratic vision directed at creating alternatives for not just the 'working class' but everyone who is fucked by capitalism."

You got me going with the last bit of your sentence. Particularly after reading this post and the response:  https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/05/431352.html

There is a problem here for those who follow Marx & Engels' writings. They see the revolutionary potential in the 'working class', or even more narrowly, the urban working class organising in factories or other large scale industries. This automatically excludes 'everyone who is fucked by capitalism'.

It goes back to the attitude of Marx, Lenin, Engels,Trotsky, who disdain the anarchists in 1918 Russia, who work and associate with petty-thieves and other 'lumped proletariat' because they are below the level of the proletariet and not capable of revolutionary action. Kind of typical of their kind of patronising views of people really.

It also makes me think about the Spanish Civil War, where the marxists essentially wrote off the revolutionary power of the rural (or peasant) people who were throwing the church out of their communities and implementing libertarian communism and sharing their land. And before the Civil War, anarchists had been working on projects in the countryside for years, helping people to learn to read and write, etc, thereby building up communities in support of an activing living libertarian movement, with their own newspapers, organisational structures, and identities.

I'm not sure any marxists are particularly interested in working with this group who is 'fucked by capitalism'. Strangely, they attract a greater number of 'intellectuals' at the universities as part of socialist student groups and the like, but I suppose both anarchists and marxists have historically understood there to be a role for these kinds of people in revolutionary struggle.

But anyway, in regards to the constituency which is living below the poverty line (which marx calls lumpenproletariat), probably engaged in drugs, petty thefts, in and out of prison, on remand, unable to read and write, working on the black market, unemployed, etc etc. This is the kind of group that anarchists have historically been much better at working with, and in a state such as the UK, where there is such a large group of marginalised and angry people, it seems the anarchist movement should think about how and whether it actively attempts to include such groups in its movement.

In my opinion, there is a danger that te movement becomes centred on a middle-class intellectual group, which has its own - valid - frustrations to be sure, but automomatically puts off other kinds of people such as non-students. Or even more dangerously, from the standpoint of creating a mass movement (rather than revolutionary/insurrectionary cells) a movement centred on those who have been active in an 'activist ghetto' for years; this may include some of the most dedicated and active individuals, but also has its very particular take on society and a set of customs which to be sure, marks it out as separate from the larger population, and often acts (consciously or unconsciously) to exlude those who don't fit in exactly.

Anyway, its time to enjoy the sun, but it will be interesting to read about the outcomes of the conference...

Ramble


No they're not

01.06.2009 11:05

In size and influence, the BNP are very small beer compared with the BUF in the 1930s.

Doesn't mean we should be complacent, though.

Stroppyoldgit


The original fascists were tiny, laughable and ineffectual

01.06.2009 13:10

...until they mushroomed through the collapse of 'serious' opposition.

Still, the real danger of the BNP today is that mainstream parties such as the Labour&Conservative will try to 'steal their ground'. By espousing extreme right policies they make slightly less extreme right policies seem to be 'the middle ground'. It is a framing of the argument useful only to the actual establishment, the so called neo-liberal/neo-conservative parties which have a proven record in recent genocide.

Danny