Skip to content or view screen version

Strangers into Citizens: how we 'infiltrated' their march

one of no borders | 04.05.2009 17:41 | Anti-racism | Migration | Social Struggles

How beautiful to see many thousands of migrants marching for their rights...

...What's a shame the demands of Strangers into Citizens are some that Boris Johnson and several toffs, new labour and lib dems do agree with: path to citizienship conditonal to:
- 6 year proof of residence in the UK (if you came after you need not apply, or if where exploited doing cash in hand jobs and cannot prove you have been here...);
- a clean criminal record for you and all your family (when the vast majority of irregular immigrants had to break the law, i.e. present fake papers in order to get work and/or when they came here, since all avenues to migrate 'legally' have been closed except for the rich);
- good English (you try and go to English classes after working 12 hours or more);
-character references and a contract or sponsorship from an employer (just in case you were thinking to fight for better working conditions... forget about it!);
- a picture of the Queen hanging in your bedroom? (sorry I am not sure this is part of the conditions for earning citizenship, but all the others are!)
SiC means Strangers into Citizens but sic also means: I do not quite agree... The interests of migrant workers cannot possibly coincide with the interests of a minority in the ruling elite.

We met amongst comrades from Latin American Coordinadora and Campaign Against Immigration Controls; and we decided that something had to be done. We decided to form our own block and we distributed a leaflet explaining what our demands are: Papers for All - not amnesty for a few. We met at the Elephant and Castle and marched towards Trafalgar Square, with the Latin American workers associations, the Solidarity Federation, FRFI etc, and shouting papers for all / papeles for todos/as all the way... The weather was not too bad and we had quite a good time, and I am pleased to say that the crowd quite liked our slogans and repeated them gladly - unlike when, during the rally in Trafalgar Square, the organizers invited the people to sing 'God Save the Queen' : nearly nobody was up for it a part from a group of Catholic Chinese (it happened for real, it is not a joke). Queen not too popular amongst migrants communities.
In Trafalgar Square we met with more friends and decided to have a separate rally - finding it not quite interesting listening to church leaders and politicians. Members of the various campaigns spoke, i.e. Willis Cleaners, Columbia Solidarity, CAIC, Latin American Workers Association, International Federation of Iraqui Refugees - asking how they can deport people to Iraq after what they have done to their country, or what right have they got to decide who can come here from South America, after the West have pillaged all their wealth...and did the American Indians asked for papers to all the illegal immigrants that arrived there from Europe?
I ended up having a coffee with a friend who is an asylum seeker, she is getting sick with the worry and stress of living here 6 years, separated from her children and not knowing what will happen to her; recently she was detained and threatened with deportation. A man I know is about to be deported: he is a torture survivor, has even got a medical legal report, but that is not proof enough for the Home Office... he could 'relocate safely' according to the judge, so this evening they are going to take him from suicide watch and put him on a flight and there is damn nothing I can do about it.
Only a strong movement can challenge this brutal and inhumane system of immigration controls, so I live for the day I will see the migrants in their thousands, tens and hundred of thousands taking things in their own hands, with the support of their UK friends... for justice and rights for all.

one of no borders

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

English people telling others to learn languages! WHAT!!!!!!

04.05.2009 19:50

- good English (you try and go to English classes after working 12 hours or more);


Perhaps, before us British start lecturing other people about learning languages, we should put our own house in order?

How many British people have learnt fluency in another language, other than those from bi-lingual homes? The English-speaking peoples must have some of the worst language skills in the world, despite so many opportunities at school, university or evening classes. In particular, how many of the 1 million British in Spain have made any significant effort to learn the language, understand the culture or integrate with the local population?

Gregory Beetle


erm...

04.05.2009 21:13

There are about 100 (ish) languages and dialects in London spoken by each community.

Which one do we learn first?, Some of the folks coming to the UK cant read so printed material wont work.

So how do they get work, or find out where they are, or talk to the various social services they need to?

The ones working with the public dont normaly present a problem, those who cant get shoved into menial "picking or packing" jobs, with gang masters (normaly their own people) who will use EVERY dodge to keep their herd under control, the normal checks and ballences dont work because the 'agencies' are also run by their own (chinese and russian, the latter due to most east european countries being forced to learn russian in soviet state schools).

So to report these abuses requies either a friend who can speak English (rare) or can run away and find a police station (happens a lot if my sources are correct), but there they face the possibility of the imigration services getting involved.

So asking people to learn English is a good thing and assists in their life and helps them, to not do so leaves them exposed to abuse.

so which one do you advocate?

not good at languages


"infiltration" and denigration?

04.05.2009 21:49

That story and the voices of the Columbians and Iraqi's are welcome additions to the debate, and I know from reading the leaflets today that there are a lot of valid concerns about how an amnesty might be implemented deviously (although obviously the point of the rally was for a *good* amnesty, any sign of bait-and-switch would naturally be opposed).

However this article seems to be more denigrating and sneering at those who are proposing a policy which is partial, yes, but still ambitious and will actually help real people's lives right now, why does anything practical have to be looked down on? The implication that anything supported (not led, btw) by politicians, 'toffs', and religious groups 'cannot possibly coincide' with migrants rights is just infuriating.

There are quite a few things that could be said about utopian borderless flights of fancy as well, but the way it should work is practical action (yes including comromises to public opinion, grow up!) and idealistic debate going hand in hand.

SK


Snarky grammatical correction #14910

05.05.2009 09:33

Just for clarity, "sic" doesn't mean "I don't agree". It's Latin for "so" or "thus" - in the sense of "the original from which I am quoting was phrased/spelled/mangled in this fashion, as reproduced here."

Education, education, education!

Forfarfour Eastfifefive


"infiltration" and denigration? Answers to questions

05.05.2009 14:27




"That story and the voices of the Columbians and Iraqi's are welcome additions to the debate..."

-So why wasn't they given an adequate place on the speakers platform?

"However this article seems to be more denigrating and sneering at those who are proposing a policy which is partial, yes, but still ambitious etc."

-It is the type of regularistions that the toffs etc are proposing - earned citizenship for a few 'good' migrants to the exclusion of the vast majority.

"The implication that anything supported (not led, btw) by politicians, 'toffs', and religious groups 'cannot possibly coincide' with migrants rights is just infuriating".

-It is a fact, no matter how it infuriates you. I said religious leaders not religious groups.

There are quite a few things that could be said about utopian borderless flights of fancy as well, but the way it should work is practical action (yes including comromises to public opinion, grow up!)- and idealistic debate going hand in hand.

I do spend most of my time doing practical actions. I do not compromise with those who are misleading public opinion, especially if they are giving false hope to pelople who are in a dire situation.
The world we live in has been a borderless flight of fancy for several thousands of years, before some elites started setting up states and empires, for the purpose of better pillage, rape, murder and enslave.

one of no borders


I agree but

13.05.2009 15:12

Yes everyone should be entitled to an amnesty, whatever their status. But the reason the amnesty as it's proposed is likely to get widespread support is that it follows some of the principles that international law has set down to guide decisions about migration, border controls and human rights. It should really be 5 years, according to the ILO Convention on Migrant Workers, and minor offences should not count, especially not any offences related to 'false papers' and so on - these should not be used to exclude people. But I agree with your position, wholeheartedly. Just trying to explain that those asking for an amnesty for some are not at all the 'enemy' we need to confront.

Helen Hintjens
mail e-mail: hintjens@iss.nl
- Homepage: http://iss.nl/hintjens