Oh, yes, let's have some blue-sky thinking, naval gazing and wringing of the corporate tea towel...

Hmmm ... not sure about tagging, but the general idea makes sense I think. So much of what we do is reactive ... ergo, predictable. I say, let's think about where we want to get to and start to build that, taking as many as we can with us.

So far on Indymedia there is nothing that supports this kind of thinking, so the basic idea sounds fair enough.

don't forget to mention "low hanging fruit". The world is so much richer with the use of corporatespeak.

But i do like the idea of the new catagory. Might make campaigns less insular. Does, however, provide a one-stop-shop insight into how we develop ideas to our foes. So maybe not such a good idea?
Thoughts?

I think this is an interesting proposal and I support it tentatively. Several questions immediately arise...

a) Why not do this on somewhere like LibCom?

b) What is to stop this being trolled to death?

If we, for instance, think about the whole violence/non-violence debate, then how is that going to progress, consensus reached and so on. Without some sort of proper process the debate will most likely be destroyed or be reduced to several people who will never agree bickering constantly with each other.

More useful would be a sort of zine approach with different positions clearly and thoughtfully laid out without personal snipping at each other and a tacit agreement that it is okay to disagree with each other.