Skip to content or view screen version

Waterboarding Approved Specifically To Justify Iraq War

Craig Murray | 25.04.2009 20:30 | Anti-militarism | Repression | Terror War | World

I have just learnt something which has convinced me that Bush, Cheney and Rice are indeed evil in the sense that Hitler was evil. I did not actually believe that until today.

The excellent and much-respected Marjorie Cohn, President of the National Lawyers Guild of the USA and Professor of Law at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, has discovered that waterboarding was first approved in July 2002 by Condoleeza Rice, specifically to force confessions of links between al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein.

Everybody in the intelligence and security worlds knew there were no such links - Bin Laden and Hussein were enemies. Only torture could yield "intelligence" of such links to provide a justification of the invasion of Iraq. There could be no clearer indication that these evil people wished to launch an illegal war of aggression for their other reasons.

If it is not evil to use torture to try to create a pretext for launching aggressive war, then what is evil?

Here is the full text of Marjorie's article.

"When I testified last year before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties about Bush interrogation policies, Congressman Trent Franks (R-Ariz) stated that former CIA Director Michael Hayden had confirmed that the Bush administration only waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashirit for one minute each. I told Franks I didn’t believe that. Sure enough, one of the newly released torture memos reveals that Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times and Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times. One of Stephen Bradbury’s 2005 memos asserted that “enhanced techniques” on Zubaydah yielded the identification of Mohammed and an alleged radioactive bomb plot by Jose Padilla. But FBI supervisory special agent Ali Soufan, who interrogated Zubaydah from March to June 2002, wrote in the New York Times that Zubaydah produced that information under traditional interrogation methods, before the harsh techniques were ever used."

"Why, then, the relentless waterboarding of these two men? It turns out that high Bush officials put heavy pressure on Pentagon interrogators to get Mohammed and Zubaydah to reveal a link between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 hijackers, in order to justify Bush’s illegal and unnecessary invasion of Iraq in 2003, according to a newly released report of the Senate Armed Services Committee. That link was never established."

"The Senate Intelligence Committee revealed that Condoleezza Rice approved waterboarding on July 17, 2002 “subject to a determination of legality by the OLC.” She got it two weeks later from Bybee and John Yoo. Rice, Dick Cheney, John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales and George Tenet reassured the CIA in spring 2003 that the abusive methods were legal."

"Team Bush claimed - and still claims - that it had to use harsh techniques to protect us from the terrorists. They really sought to create evidence to rationalize an illegal, unnecessary, and tragic war."

That is absolutely stunning in its implications. How much of this did Blair and Straw also know?

Craig Murray
- Homepage: http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2009/04/waterboarding_a.html

Additions

Condoleeza Rice Appproved Waterboarding Torture

25.04.2009 20:35

It emerges that Condoleeza Rice gave the go-ahead for waterboarding as National Security Adviser.
 http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090423/ts_alt_afp/usattacksmilitaryjusticecongresszubaydah

This blog brought you information on the torture of Khalid Sheik Mohammed over two years ago.
 http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/03/cia_torture_and.html

The man was waterboarded - which causes excruciating pain and suffocation - over 180 times. That is about once every three days over the period in question. There are few examples in history of anybody ever being tortured so severely over such an extended period. Can you imagine the permanent mental anguish, of waiting for the next physical anguish to begin?

Plainly the "Ticking bomb" argument used by Cheney and the pro-torture lobby is a myth, when torture extends over years.

As a result of this extreme and prolonged torture, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to pretty well every terrorist atrocity you can name or planned terrorist atrocity you can imagine. In the UK alone, under torture he "confessed" to plans to blow up Heathrow, Canary Wharf, Big Ben and Buckingham Palace. There are similar lists for pretty well every other Western country.

When I wrote the following back in 2007 this blog got 500 visitors a day: now it gets 5,000 let me repeat it:

Secret Confessions and Torture

Mohammed Sheikh Khalid has now, voluntarily and of his own free will, admitted he masterminded every significant event from the Norman Invasion through the bubonic plague, fall of Constantinople, and Great Fire of London, to the Battle of Little Big Horn, assassination of JFK and the Oklahoma bombing.

Or he might as well have. The extraordinarily comprehensive list of terrorist outrages for which he claims responsibility would be beyond the capacity of any but the most brilliant and inspired mortal; Khalid, I fear, is a more run of the mill thug.

But in truth, we have absolutely no idea what, if anything, he has confessed at all. The BBC brazenly reported all of yesterday that while Khalid did allege he had been tortured during his four years of secret detention by the CIA in various locations around the globe, he is now freely confessing under no duress and does not retract any of his confession.

Who says? The proceedings being held in Guantanamo Bay, and which the BBC report so uncritically, are held behind barbed wire, machine guns, gun emplacements, reinforced steel and concrete and combination locks, before an exclusively military panel. Khalid does not even have a lawyer present. For all we know, his confession could be an entire fabrication. The blandness of the BBC reporting in these circumstances is one of the worst examples of the appalling desertion of the principles of that once worthwhile institution.

The readiness of the rest of the media to push the "instil fear" button on behalf of the Orwellian government is predictable. They report as fact that Khalid also planned to blow up Heathrow, Canary Wharf, Big Ben, Buckingham Palace and any other British building the Pentagon had heard of.

If Khalid really is freely and openly confessing all of this stuff, then what possible reason can there be to deny him a lawyer, and not allow public and media access to his trial? The atrocities he allegedly confesses - the Twin Towers, Madrid, Bali - left thousands of bereaved families. They have a right to see justice done, rather than this elaborate propaganda set-up, with its total lack of proper legal process or intellectual credibility.

Did Khalid really do all of this? Two facts must be considered. He has been through years of vicious torture and of solitary confinement. If the experience of others who survived extraordinary rendition is typical, he has been kept in total isolation, in darkness, beaten, cut, suffocated and drowned, suffered white noise and sensory deprivation. He will have been moved around, often not even knowing which country he is in. One good contact has told me that the CIA gave the Uzbek torturers their turn with him. I do not know that for certain, but who can contradict me?

After years of this, a person can be so psychologically damaged that they believe the narrative of their torturers to be the truth. It is perfectly possible that he now in fact believes he did all that stuff on the list, when he did not.

Alternatively, he may have decided to exaggerate his own role and achievements for the personal glory it brings. We can get the appalling situation where both the sides which benefit from and wish to promote the War on Terror - Al Qaida and the CIA - indulge in what becomes a grim mutual cooperation in exaggeration as each seeks to glorify their role. Thus do those on both sides who actually desire a "Clash of Civilisations", promote one.

What is happening now in Guanatanamo Bay is a disgrace. We cannot in present circumstances accept anything that comes out of it as other than a completely unsubstantiated claim by the Pentagon. Some of it is quite possibly true. But this is no way to make the case.

 http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/03/secret_confessi.html

The UK is complicit in this torture. Every bit of "intelligence" from the CIA torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the thousands of other victims of torture by the CIA or their foreign liason intelligence agencies, has been shared with MI6 by the CIA. Jack Straw took the positive decision that the UK should accept intelligence from torture. That is the main point of the evidence I shall give to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights on Tuesday 28 April.

Craig Murray
- Homepage: http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2009/04/condoleeza_rice.html


Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Craig is listed

25.04.2009 23:24

"That is the main point of the evidence I shall give to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights on Tuesday 28 April. "

Is this a one off event or are you likely to have more opportunities to discuss this in Parliament? If so, I think you should consider delaying if you are able to. There has been some recent progress about these cases that in my opinion suggests you should 'hold your fire' for a month or so if that is possible. With the greatest respect for your previous decisions, I think your interpretations of these cases are just slightly, but importantly, off target. Especially, I am not convinced the House of Commons is a better place for evidence than Indymedia.

Messy
mail e-mail: CriticalMess@riseup


@Messy

27.04.2009 12:02

This is a one-off event and as far as I know there is no chance of delaying. I think that would be a mistake anyway - the govt have fought tooth and nail to discredit Craig Murray - and to ensure he was not able to give evidence on Tuesday 28th April. He has now been invited to give evidence despite apparent misgivings from the committee (possible government pressure?). I think this opportunity needs to be grasped with both hands.

In what way do you think that CM's interpretations are incorrect here? Either comment here, or better still, on his blog, where a conversation can be had on the issue.

As to whether Indymedia is a better forum for this evidence than a Parliamentary Joint Committee, I disagree. The MSM can ignore the former with ease - but the latter is harder to ignore. It is part of the establishment, sure, but at the moment we need it to carry out its purpose effectively.

I have put up a notice about Craig's evidence session for Tues 28th:

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/04/428643.html

Jon


Bad timing

27.04.2009 22:33

"This is a one-off event and as far as I know there is no chance of delaying. I think that would be a mistake anyway - the govt have fought tooth and nail to discredit Craig Murray - and to ensure he was not able to give evidence on Tuesday 28th April. He has now been invited to give evidence despite apparent misgivings from the committee (possible government pressure?). I think this opportunity needs to be grasped with both hands."

I understand and appreciate that, it would just be better if he could've delayed for a few days, if he had that option. There is progress being made on the use of torture, both in the US and in the UK. I'd be happy to discuss this via email in the meantime, not on any website though.

"In what way do you think that CM's interpretations are incorrect here?"

I think the UK press has been focussing too much on the authorised use of waterboarding. I don't see that as the major issue. I realise it is torture, but I've been reading a lot of US torture reports and frankly I'd rather be waterboarded daily than suffer some of the other abuse. I assume CM is using waterboarding as a recognised 'launching off point', and with his history I am sure he will expand on that, but it'd just have been better if this was happening next week.

Messy