Skip to content or view screen version

Extreme police tactics targeting campaigners exposed by Plane Stupid

Plane Stupid Scotland | 25.04.2009 14:41

Tilly Gifford of Plane Stupid Scotland exposed extreme police tactics used in an attempt to infiltrate the direct action group. Using spy cameras and skype phones she recorded two officers making offers including thousands of pounds in return for regular insider information.

Extreme police tactics targeting campaigners exposed by counter-espionage by Plane Stupid activist

Over the past few months the police have been approaching climate activists with offers of cash for inside information. Tilly Gifford from Plane Stupid Scotland last night exposed police tactics used by the “community intelligence unit.” Using a hidden camera and skype phone she recorded two officers suggesting tens of thousands of pounds could be exchanged in return for weekly meetings to inform the police on Plane Stupid’s activities.

Evidence of high levels of police activity regarding climate activists is not only clearly a miss-spending of tax payer’s money but also a blatant breach of the right for peaceful protest. This couldn’t have come at a more apt time; the persistent and often aggressive interrogation of Plane Stupid highlights how the state is placing the interests of powerful corporations over those of the public and the environment. This comes in the wake of a long list of extreme and over the top policing towards climate activists recently including Climate Camp last August, violence towards campaigners during the G20 protests and police infiltration of coal activists in Nottingham. The police are treating peaceful protesters as criminals, when they are simply campaigning to protect the destruction of the environment from runaway climate change.

The police maintain it wasn’t Plane Stupid they were “worried about, but individuals within Plane Stupid”; individuals, they claimed, who may be planning acts of violence in the name of our cause. We've heard it all before. At the Climate Camps, it was the elusive “hardcore of trouble-makers” intent on provoking violence, and in the case of the Nottingham conspiracy, “those arrested posed a serious threat to the safe running of the site." EON, the owners of the alleged target of the alleged protest, gave us a helpful clue about what is going here in their statement following the arrests: “While we understand that everyone has a right to protest peacefully and lawfully, this was clearly neither of those things.”

In a country with a long history of peaceful protest and direct action, heavy policing is threatening our democracy and right to protest. Activists have been at the forefront of productive change from the road movements of the 1990’s to the rent strikes in Glasgow and recent occupations of schools. “It’s dangerous to lock people up for thinking about action,” commented Geraint Bevan, coordinator of NO2ID Scotland. “You cannot have pre-emptive justice and people have the right to say “we want change”.” Police interrogation and pay-offs cannot be allowed to get in the way of climate action to prevent carbon heavy businesses reaping huge profit at the expense of our communities and planet. Non-violent direct action represents an expression of the need for change, and offers a vital outlet for representation of public interests in the face of unjust laws and major corporations. We must ask ourselves whose interests are really being served by devoting such extravagant police resources to preventing peaceful disruption to major polluters whose core activities are driving us ever closer to the precipice of catastrophic, runaway global warming.

List to the tapes and read the transcripts  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/audio/2009/apr/24/police-surveillance-intelligence-1


Plane Stupid Scotland
- e-mail: planestupidscotland@activix.org
- Homepage: http://www.planestupid.com

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Extreme?

25.04.2009 18:29

It's not particularly extreme. It's what police do day in day out with regard to political people they investigate. This time they were even more dumb and got caught! Well done to all but it's not exceptional.

@


what I don't understand is

25.04.2009 20:20

that the police knew she was possibly recording, because in the first transcript they ask her if she's still recording, and she tells them that it runs out after half an hour and she was sure it was more than half an hour. I don't understand.

On Newsnight or somewhere, she spoke of "young people" opposing climate change - as if it's been some agreement somewhere that Plane Stupid people talk about their youth...which doesn't really seem so fair on everyone over 25, and it makes it easy to dismiss the protests with "oh they'll grow out of it" (not that they wouldn't find other ways of dismissing them if there wasn't that excuse!)

oldie


Not stupid

26.04.2009 12:48

People seem to think it was 'stupid' for the police to get 'caught' making this offer but think again....

When approaching a dedicated activist who is motivated by ideology not money, the chances are that you'll get told to fuck off. Maybe you'll get lucky, catch them at a time when they desperately need money, or got caught with some embarrassing photos on their computer last time their house got raided, or they've got a kid brother nicked for joy-riding who the cops could go easy on. In such a cases you might get them to co-operate but if you just get rejected it's no big deal and you can still benefit.

When an activist is approached, maybe they don't want to tell anyone, holding back for info because they fear people will not trust them or because they think perhaps in the future they might change their minds. But what if somebody noticed that you had that little chat in the coffee shop? What if the cops let it slip to somebody else? Creating distrusting among activists is often as damaging to a movement than having infiltrators. Even if the person does go public with the fact that they were approached, people may still have trust issues - why did the cops think that person might help them?

Better yet, when the person goes public it becomes free advertising, an easy way to recruit others who you've not yet approached or thought of approaching - perhaps somebody involved in the periphery of a campaign (organising benefit parties or occasionally siting in on meetings with a more dedicated friend). Such a person might be amenable to the idea of a bit of cash-in-hand - perhaps to support a drug habit.

And what of getting recorded - surely that is undesirable, embarrassing even? Well, perhaps. But it's also great propaganda value. Look at this week with headlines of how the police are running a network of hundreds of infiltrators within the environmental movement. That's enough to scare many people off being involved in taking action yet it sounds like pure propaganda to me. Hundreds of spys? We don't have that many people active in the campaigns! If there were that many spys it would mean that half the people at any meeting were actual working for the cops and we'd be totally fucked.

Tillys recording do not represent the cops getting caught with the pants down. You'll notice that the cops were aware that at least some of their conversations were being recorded and they simple do not care - or they actually wanted there to be recordings. The fear of infiltration and the paranoia that goes with it - that's a powerfully disruptive weapon to use against protesters.

So how about this picture... Tilly talked to the cops, she recorded some of those conversations, she talked to them a lot, she was tempted but she'd already told a friend that this was happening, the cops suggest she could still be a grass AND expose the cops for trying to turn her, she publishes the tapes, the cops enjoy the benefits of great black propaganda and get a spy whose credentials have now improved in her comrades eyes. How's that for dangerous speculation!

uncle


"How's that for dangerous speculation! "

27.04.2009 23:46

Incredible, as in, 'not credible' imo, but worth considering though. It should also be easy for the PS crowd to dismiss too so why haven't they? There are 3 hours of recordings that were given to the Guardian, only minutes of which that were published.

It seems reasonable to assume that if Tilly was a spy, then the cops wouldn't have mentioned, or at least wouldnt be quoted as mentioning, the fact they thought they were being recorded. It seems likely that the cops just speculated early on in the interview that they were being recorded, and everything that they said was with a partial awareness that they may be being recorded. In that case, Tillys answers make perfect sense. What would you say to a cop you were recording who asked you if you were recording them? PS could clear this up by releasing the full transcript here.

And even say for the sake or argument /investigation, we were to assume that this is a black op and that Tilly is an agent. If so it has backfired. PS has raised issues that of concern to all UK activists and grabbed the headlines with it. It is true that it could be a plot to make us trust Tilly and PS more, but judging from the comments here then that has hardly worked.

I hadn't heard of Tilly until the Aberdeen protest. I latched onto her name and criticised her heavily for reasons I still feel are valid. I followed this story closely and I still feel whatever the motivation, this story had a positive effect.

Activists do get recruited and blacklisted, prison isn't nice, maybe it does take a posh girl to get any recognition of these issues reported upon on TV news.

noFlier