Skip to content or view screen version

Ian Tomlinson CCTV evidence

The Watcher | 14.04.2009 11:25 | G20 London Summit | Repression | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements

Previous police denials of CCTV evidence may be lies, sorry if this old news or been posted elsewhere.

(Taken from Karoo internet news page.)

Police watchdog admits Ian Tomlinson CCTV error
CCTV footage of the events leading up to the death of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests in London may exist, the police watchdog has admitted.

The chair of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which is investigating the death of the 47-year-old, had previously insisted there was no CCTV footage available.

Speaking on Channel 4 news on Thursday April 9th, Nick Hardwick had said: "We don't have CCTV footage of the incident... there is no CCTV footage, there were no cameras in the location where he was assaulted."

However, a statement from the IPCC on Tuesday acknowledged that there were cameras in the surrounding area.

The IPCC has launched its own investigation into Mr Tomlinson's death after video footage obtained by the Guardian newspaper showed him being pushed to the ground by a Metropolitan police officer.

The video, which also appeared to show the newspaper vendor being struck by a police baton, contradicted earlier claims from Scotland Yard that Mr Tomlinson had not come into contact with officers.

Minutes after the filmed incident, Mr Tomlinson died from a heart attack. A post-mortem showed he had died of natural causes, but a second autopsy has been requested by the IPCC.

"We continue to appeal for more information, including any other video footage," said IPCC commissioner and deputy chair Deborah Glass.

"Clearly there were a lot of people in the area when this incident happened and we still need people to contact us with any information or images they have of Mr Tomlinson."

The Watcher

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

IPCC 'may not be accurate'

14.04.2009 14:42

It is an extraordinary claim that was made at the time, that there was no CCTV footage. That seems unlikely anywhere in London at any time now, and certainly would require verififying before claiming it. The speed of it suggests bias if not a cover-up. It also seems untenable that the investigation was being handed to City of London police to investigate. I think Hardwick should resign before any creedence is given to the investigation.

"
During the live interview he said - "We don't have CCTV footage of the incident... there is no CCTV footage, there were no cameras in the location where he was assaulted."

At this point Mr Hardwick believed that he was correct in this assertion– we now know this may not be accurate.

There are cameras in the surrounding area.

From the outset it has been a main line of our enquiry to recover all CCTV from the Corporation of London and from all private premises in the area. This work is ongoing and involves many hours of viewing and detailed analysis.
"

Danny
- Homepage: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/pr140409_tomlinsoncctv.htm


The IPCC aren't the Police

14.04.2009 15:10

It was a statement from Nick Hardwick who is not, and never has been a Police officer. The IPCC is not the Police, get your facts right before you accuse other people of getting their facts wrong, you just make yourself look stupid.

metanon


Really

14.04.2009 16:56

"The IPCC is not the Police"....really? The 'independent' bit of the IPCC, doesn't seem to be working at the moment, please return when “operation police state” has been finally smashed by the people of the UK.

\AR