Skip to content or view screen version

Battle of Threadneedle Street

Eryn Angharad Beynon | 09.04.2009 14:32 | G20 London Summit | Analysis | Globalisation

The article refers to the G20 demonstartions that took place outside the RBS. In light of criticism that Police have had I believe this piece will give a correct account of how they behaved and how the tactic of cordoning the crowd in aggravated the situation.

In the wake of the horrible footage that was released on Tuesday showing the defenceless man that died on April 1st being pushed by police, after simply walking home through the G20 Meltdown. My experience of the day has to be heard.

A massive yellow canary being stretchered away, with the words R.I.P Canary Wharf written on him was genius. Being April the 1st, there was no doubting who the fools were today. The protest, aimed at the G20 summit, commenced at London Bridge and travelled a short distance to The Bank of England. This was a perfect chance for me and my fellow students to get stuck in to what promised to be the largest protest since the 2001 anti war campaign.

And get stuck in I did. Protesters were hoping to leave the square mile and head towards the University of East London, where an autonomous summit was due to take place. Discussions were due to focus on, as the vocal speaker put it, “What needs to be done to our economy, locally, nationally, European wise and through the world. Follow the samba band, if you want to be part of the revolution”. Fearing the worse, police decided to seal all entrances off, leaving thousands of protesters unable to leave, a tactic known as kettling. As protesters tried to make their way down ThreadNeedle Street they met stiff opposition in the form of-The Riot Police.

By now I had managed to haul my tiny frame through the masses to the front line, where I was confronted by a pack of Bulls. All kitted out in their armour, I knew my eyes were deceiving me but one officer was blowing steam from his ears. Another shed a tear, more likely to be beads of sweat. What prevailed in the next three hours, outside the RBS building became quite an eye opener.

The situation became a stand-off, with each meter or two gained by protesters, police would barge back. Shields and truncheons at the ready. Just as things would calm a little, the police would get restless and barge some more. Sandwiched between two sides of the law it seemed ludicrous that the police would be the ones to apply force and it turn arguably instigating what turned into constant scuffles.

“Who are you defending, not your people, chanted the masses”. Something so simple had never sounded so true. “We want to go forward but we are here for a peaceful protest”, shouted another. A group of twenty to thirty people sat down, emphasising they were not ready to cause trouble. There were many blood casualties; each wondering how it became that standing for your right deserved this sort of treatment.

“Who’s Street, Our Street”. No one was going to back down in a hurry. Protesters had broken windows on the RBS building, it was time to get tough, bring out the cavalry. I couldn’t help thinking that being contained was not helping matters whatsoever. On this note I made my way back to the square where spirits were much on the brighter side, the party had begun. I sat reflecting on the stark contrast of what I was experiencing now and what I had just witnessed. We were sat in a massive fish-bowl, you were lucky to be let out and there was definitely no one coming in.

Out from the bubbling cauldron, came Joe one of our crew, looking a whiter shade of white. He had been caught in a moment, guilty of coming too close to the hand of the law. “I’ve had enough of the Met for one day. I was stood there, there was pushing and then wham”, he said, sporting an eye socket that was darkening by the minute and a hand that won’t function for a while.

Eryn Angharad Beynon
- e-mail: eabeynon@live.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Sitting down?

09.04.2009 15:33

"A group of twenty to thirty people sat down, emphasising they were not ready to cause trouble. There were many blood casualties;" so it was you and your crew who insisted that people sit down? this has to stop! There are certain tactics to be employed in these situations and sitting down is definitely not one of them - this is usually used by students or hippies who have never experienced police violence before at demonstrations and think that this is what you do - it isnt!. Sitting down is only useful when you are attempting to obstruct something i.e a police van or something, they are NOT used when the police are wading in attacking people, hence the “many bloody casualties”. This tactic is just silly. Additionally, the people who i saw sitting down caused more trouble than not, the police would push people who would then be tripping over these 'sitters' i was one of them - very very annoying.

If you do choose to sit down, then you must at least link arms, its quite simple really, because all the sitters at the G20 were not linked, therefore making it easy for police to snatch them, proving this tactic is really really ineffective. I suggest that before you start yelling at people to “sit down”, maybe think about whether this is really the right tactic to be employed at that time, because I and many other activists will not just sit there while being bludgeoned by batons, sorry.

Anarchist


sitters should be shot?

09.04.2009 20:32

That's sometimes how I feel, though I don't want to. It's the moralising whiny appeal to the cops' better nature that gets me - it won't work when they get the orders. Meanwhile you have made yourselves and others more vulnerable, less mobile (to TAKE space as well as fall back), and just downright a danger not a help. Read the Guide to Public Order Situations and think some before you go out on the streets next.
 http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/22429

agree