Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Johnson's Baby Wipes and Child Porn

mickeymac | 28.03.2009 17:26 | Gender | Health | Social Struggles

Our civilisation is based on greed and competition, on doing as much as you think you can get away with if it makes you a few quid. So the advertising industry has pushed the boundaries of accepability all the way to breaking point. Someone has to call a halt to this obscene exploitation of the naked bodies of human babies.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Johnson's Baby Wipes and Child Pornography / Child Prostitution

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you view British television even a little, your eyes will have been
assailed daily by an advertisement for Johnson's baby wipes, which is
shown frequently, as well as many other advertisements in the same
vein. I don't remember exactly, but there may be more than one such
advert for the same product. The imagery is of glamorous women
lovingly caressing naked babies, usually ending with a woman kissing a
baby on his bare buttocks.

These infants are incapable of giving their consent to this parading
of their naked bodies in full public view, solely for financial gain.
The mothers of these babies get paid for letting their babies' naked
bodies be displayed for profit, and the manufacturers of Johnson's
baby wipes get paid via increased sales.
And the advertising agency get their cut, all on the basis of
exploiting babies' naked bodies solely for financial gain.

This looks very similar to child prostitution. The sole motive is
financial gain, for the mothers of the babies, for the advertising
firm, and for the manufacturers of the product being promoted.

What will those children think of this when they are old enough to
know that their mothers prostituted them as babies, selling images of
their babies' naked bodies for financial gain?

It's a godsend for paedophiles. Free child porn images supplied
publicly by the mothers for financial gain. I have difficulty
understanding what we call paedophilia, but logically I can deduce
that paedophiles probably are turning to these advertisements as a
safe way of accessing child porn, by making recordings of TV
programmes in which these ads are broadcast during the commercial
breaks, and then repeatedly replaying the adverts for Johnson's baby
wipes while masturbating furiously over your baby's naked body.

The emotional fallout for those tragic children when they grow up and
realise what their mothers have done to them - doesn't bear thinking
about.

-------------------

It's alien to me - the concept of being sexually aroused by babies and
young people generally. I like a quiet life, and can only view babies
and young people as an irritation to be avoided. I am attracted only
to women of mature age.

If my naked body had been exploited for financial gain when I was a
baby, and paraded publicly for all the perverts to masturbate over....
I know what I would say to my mother in adult life............

+++++How much did they pay you for prostituting my body, Mummy? Was it
worth it? What did you spend the money on, Mummy?+++++

And this is happening in Europe and North America, and being done by
mothers who are not short of a bob or two.

If the mothers were in South East Asia, and desperate for money to
feed their baby, and used the advertising agency fee to nurture the
same baby to make a difference to his health and development, that
would be different. But it is not so.

-----------------------

The cops are madly pursuing anyone who has an image of a child on his
computer.

But the mothers who prostitute their babies naked bodies for the
mother's financial gain, and to sell more Johnson's baby wipes, and to
enrich the advertising industry..... these mothers are supplying
videos of their babies' naked babies, including a video sequence of a
woman kissing their baby on his naked bottom - pure child porn - and
these women, these filthy dirty female child pornographers, are not in
jail at the time of writing but are still walking free on our streets
and living it up on the cash proceeds of prostituting their babies
naked bodies.

------------------------

Finally, it is interesting to observe the following. Men very often
care for babies, changing their nappies and bathing them and dressing
and undressing them, and applying Johnson's baby powder and Johnson's
baby wipes.
Supposedly the inclusion of men in baby care is part of the PC
agenda.
Yet no men are shown in those adverts for Johnson's baby wipes.
I wonder why.

-------------------------

mickeymac