Getting arrested
Lynn Sawyer | 22.03.2009 09:14 | Animal Liberation | Repression
Well it is alleged that I was interfering with a hunt, I was held for 6 hours and bailed, it will come to nothing.
My reason for posting is that I have not been arrested for a few years and a couple of things have changed.
First a police woman breached PACE by trying to check me for body piercings at the custody desk where there were 4 men by lifting up my t shirt(for anyone who is interested no I don't have any and have no intention of getting any). I told her in no uncertain terms that she was out of order and that she should search me somewhere private and she complied and I would advise other activists not to take this nonsense. If I am right this constituted a partial unauthorised strip search.
The other area of concern is that some Reliance bloke was under the impression that I was obliged to answer private questions about shoe size, tatoos, scars, the name of my Mums cat, my favourite colour etc. When I stuck to my guns and told him that I was only giving him name and address he was in a proper strop and was under the false impression that I could be held for longer. No-one he said had ever refused to answer such questions before and that activists were always a pain. Again no-one should be answering these questions if they do not want to, there is no legal right for them to insist.
It seems as though the private security companies are getting more and more entrenched in custody suites which in spite of the fact that I have no illusions with the police appears to be a very bad move because some of these people have even bigger delusions of granduer than police officers.
My reason for posting is that I have not been arrested for a few years and a couple of things have changed.
First a police woman breached PACE by trying to check me for body piercings at the custody desk where there were 4 men by lifting up my t shirt(for anyone who is interested no I don't have any and have no intention of getting any). I told her in no uncertain terms that she was out of order and that she should search me somewhere private and she complied and I would advise other activists not to take this nonsense. If I am right this constituted a partial unauthorised strip search.
The other area of concern is that some Reliance bloke was under the impression that I was obliged to answer private questions about shoe size, tatoos, scars, the name of my Mums cat, my favourite colour etc. When I stuck to my guns and told him that I was only giving him name and address he was in a proper strop and was under the false impression that I could be held for longer. No-one he said had ever refused to answer such questions before and that activists were always a pain. Again no-one should be answering these questions if they do not want to, there is no legal right for them to insist.
It seems as though the private security companies are getting more and more entrenched in custody suites which in spite of the fact that I have no illusions with the police appears to be a very bad move because some of these people have even bigger delusions of granduer than police officers.
Lynn Sawyer
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
question
22.03.2009 11:12
Yes, the police give much less of a shit about the law than 5 years ago, especially around when they're wiling to arrest you or otherwise infringe your rights, even if they know it'll come to nothing and they might get sued.
aunty
Well..
22.03.2009 11:43
I suspect that the police have abdicated the reponsibilty of such questions to private security personell which is not reassuring.
Furthermore he is a Reliance employee, will a private company have access to data obtained in a police station such as my photo prints and if I had answered details all about my life?
They get more and more powers year on year. I wonder if they will ever make it a condition of release to answer such questions?
Lynn Sawyer
The cops were following all day that day
22.03.2009 15:58
Glad your out and safe,Lynne .
Vegantruthist
Homepage: http://www.youtube.com/user/VeganTruthist1
Yes - they have delegated powers
22.03.2009 15:59
Delegate