London Indymedia's SHAC Clampdown
Chicken | 17.03.2009 11:39 | SHAC | Indymedia
Running scared of police attention?
More Support For SHAC Demos
https://london.indymedia.org.uk/articles/860
Hidden:
"More Support For SHAC Demos" (articles/860) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
The following reasons were given:
Needs to be checked, don't have time for it right now.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0314-yx.html
SHAC Financial Campaign Update
https://london.indymedia.org.uk/articles/830
Hidden:
"SHAC Financial Campaign Update" (articles/830) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
The following reasons were given:
Needs to be checked, don't have time for it right now.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0308-y0.html
WTF is this, solidarity actions by Indymedia London in support of the Police clampdown?
More Support For SHAC Demos
https://london.indymedia.org.uk/articles/860
Hidden:
"More Support For SHAC Demos" (articles/860) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
The following reasons were given:
Needs to be checked, don't have time for it right now.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0314-yx.html
SHAC Financial Campaign Update
https://london.indymedia.org.uk/articles/830
Hidden:
"SHAC Financial Campaign Update" (articles/830) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
The following reasons were given:
Needs to be checked, don't have time for it right now.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0308-y0.html
WTF is this, solidarity actions by Indymedia London in support of the Police clampdown?
Chicken
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Inevitable and sensible
17.03.2009 13:57
SHAC have their own website - why not use that?
Inevitable
SHACwatch is soooo not welcome
17.03.2009 14:18
Because they have every right to use a website whose mission statement is this:
"The Indymedia London website provides an interactive platform for reports from the struggles for a world based on peace, freedom, co-operation, justice and solidarity; and against environmental degradation, neoliberal exploitation, war, racism and patriarchy. The reports cover a wide range of issues and social movements - from neighbourhood campaigns to grassroots mobilisations, from critical analysis to direct action."
https://london.indymedia.org.uk/pages/mission-statement
SHACwatch however has no such right as it stands for repression and gloats over the victimisation of activists by the state.
solidarity not submission
Inevitable? Sensible?
17.03.2009 15:32
Presumably it is inevitable and sensible just not to bother with demonstrations and nonviolent direct action?
Lynn Sawyer
'needs to be checked'
17.03.2009 15:47
So I guess someone from SHAC has made contact with the London Indymedia and is working with them to verify posts? If not I guess it's all pissing in the wind.
prettybored
Which part bores you?
17.03.2009 17:38
or
That the 'media activists' at London Indymedia aren't showing solidarity with a campaign that is being severaly repressed
Brokeback Bill
How long does it take to check?
17.03.2009 19:17
But it's a few days since:
Sat Mar 14 14:10:16 PDT 2009
"More Support For SHAC Demos" (articles/860) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0314-yx.html
And a few more since:
Sun Mar 8 14:24:39 PDT 2009
"SHAC Financial Campaign Update" (articles/830) has been hidden by the user "marcos."
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-london-moderation/2009-March/0308-y0.html
How many days are we expected to wait for our "indypendent" news?
Till it's no longer news perhaps?
Snail
Homepage: http://https://london.indymedia.org.uk/hidden/list