Skip to content or view screen version

Are you being censored?

Iwascensored | 12.03.2009 09:15 | Repression

The following information might prove useful to campaigners.

As you are probably all aware Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have Terms of Use (ToU) and Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs) which you agree to when you sign up with them, and seldom read properly no doubt. If you did you would probably never sign up in the first place, though in most cases these draconian rules are never brought to bear on a majority of users. ToUs and AUPs are comprehensive and cover just about every sort of internet behaviour you can possibly imagine, even the most trivial.

ISP websites do not usually publish a contact email address, you just fill in a website form, the exception being  abuse@whoever.com which anyone can post to directly. So what if a political opponent, or a cop, is monitoring you on the internet and discovers who your ISP is, often just by using your IP address and WHOIS? What is to stop them sending abuse reports to your ISP? Even worse, what if a group of people send multiple abuse reports? Your account could be terminated instantly by the ISP abuse department, as happened to me, after I was targeted and netstalked by a group of people.

Although there are plenty of alternative ISPs around it is often time-consuming and costly to switch from one to another, especially if you have a contract, and you are left for a while without any internet access. A useful tip though if it happens to you is to trot off to a local library and use their wifi hotspot, or one of their computers, as an interim measure.

There must surely be some ISPs who are immune to this sort of induced censorship, though extensive ToUs and AUPs are obviously there to protect them from possible litigation and police seizures.

Iwascensored

Comments

Hide 3 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

censorship

12.03.2009 10:39

ironic post given the fact that i have seen a few posts on indymedia removed as they didnt agree with the article people were commented on i have even had a few removed

we all have our own opinions let us air them

hector


Can you give more details about your case?

12.03.2009 20:55

Are you able to go into a bit more detail on your specific case?

What exactly were you accused of, and by whom

anon


How I was censored.

13.03.2009 07:34

I don't wish to give too much away at this stage for obvious reasons as the matter is ongoing.

After years of extreme abuse from a small group of disgruntled people on a newsgroup, I am a political campaigner, I threatened to publicise their email addresses. It was an empty threat because their addresses were disguised and indecipherable anyway but it seemed to make them paranoid nevertheless and they reported me to my ISP, who took my threat seriously. Following a telephone conversation with the abuse department, during which I got understandably annoyed, they cut off my broadband immediately and the ISP is now trying to charge me over 90 quid for breach of their contract. Since then the same group of people have been making repeated abuse reports against me to ISPs for trivial reasons as they have now realised how much power it gives them and they have stalked me onto other newsgroups. Of course, the temptation is to give in to this form of censorship and moderate my net presence but I am disinclined to do that.

What was evident from the telephone conversation with the abuse department was that the person on the other end had a very poor understanding of USENET charters and typical USENET behaviour.

Iwascensored


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

all the time

16.03.2009 23:14

get suppressed all the time, mainly on this site for not following the dictatorial editorial mandate designed to keep debate down

Harry Purvis


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

censoring

20.03.2009 01:38

everywhere is operating censoring policies.

try typing "indymedia censoring" into google and you'll see how much goes on. so much for free speech

a


Hide 3 hidden comments or hide all comments