Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Death of Mandamus: French, Hayne, Gummow, Crennan JJ protecting and coverup conspiracy to pervert justice

jusme | 06.03.2009 01:29 | Anti-racism | Repression | Social Struggles

AUTHORITY

Mandamus will lie for an abuse of discretion where discretion has been exercised arbitrarily and
capriciously or where discretion has been exercised in bad faith, Peavey Co. V. Corcoran 714 S.W.2d 943.
In such instances the abuse amounts, in effect, to no discretion. Mandamus is warranted when the abuse is
clear or results in a manifest injustice, Reis V. Nangle 349 S.W.2d 943. Mandamus will lie when an official
refuses to act when he has a duty to act and refuses to do so.


AUTHORITY

Mandamus will lie for an abuse of discretion where discretion has been exercised arbitrarily and
capriciously or where discretion has been exercised in bad faith, Peavey Co. V. Corcoran 714 S.W.2d 943.
In such instances the abuse amounts, in effect, to no discretion. Mandamus is warranted when the abuse is
clear or results in a manifest injustice, Reis V. Nangle 349 S.W.2d 943. Mandamus will lie when an official
refuses to act when he has a duty to act and refuses to do so.

In 2008 a writ of mandamus was filed against French et al JJ, for perverting justice by relying on a fictitious document not listed in the Appeals Book.

Death of Mandamus: French, Hayne, Gummow, Crennan JJ conspire to pervert and to cause injury
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/12980588/Death-of-Mandamus-French-Hayne-Gummow-Crennan-JJ-conspire-to-pervert-and-to-cause-injury

Not only did Hayne J refuse to hear a Notice of a Constitutional Matter, and a Writ of Mandamus, from an Application for an Order to show Cause, he decided that Mandamus actually was spelt Certiorari.

High Court Transcript M142/2007 Pham vs French & ors
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960139/Perverting-Justice-High-Court-Australia-Hayne-J

1. notice of a constitutional matter

2. application for an order to show cause

3. affidavit

Thus, allowing all other crooked judges, senior members, the free rein to abuse the law, and causing pain, suffering and death.

Byrne J and prothonotaries:
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/12980889/Death-of-Mandamus-High-Court-Australia-allow-Byrne-J-to-pervert-justice

1. notice of a constitutional matter

2. application for an order to show cause

3. affidavit

Senior member AAT: John Handley, Tim de Uray, Paul Mentor of Sparke Helmore

Transcript:V2007/1865
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960326/Perverting-Justice-AAT-Senior-Member-John-Handley

So now we are back again with a notice of a Constitutional Matter and a Mandamus !
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/12779129/Suing-CentrelinkGovernment-Notice-of-Appeal
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/12779061/Suing-CentrelinkGovernment-Notice-of-a-Constitutional-Matter

1. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;

2. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act (Cth) 1986;

3. Racial Discrimination Act (Cth) 1975;

4. Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR 965;

5. Travers v State of New South Wales [2000] FCA 1565 (3 November 2000);

6. R v Derek Bentley (Deceased) [1998] EWCA Crim 2516

7. R v Mahmoud Mattan (Deceased) 24th February 1998 No: 9706415/S2

8. High Court of Australia Act 1979 (Cth) s I I and Schedule (emphasis added)

9. Lord Denning, The Discipline of Law, Butterworths, London 1979 p 292 (emphasis added)

10.Gipp v The Queen (1998) 155 ALR 15 at 48; [1998] HCA 21 at [121]

11.Gipp v The Queen (1998) 155 ALR 15 at 60; [1998] HCA 21 at [169] per Kirby J referring to Davis &
20 Cordy v R (1937) 57

12.CLR 170 at 180 and Ratten v R (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 515

13.Gipp v The Queen (1998) 155 ALR 15 at 49; [1998] HCA 21 at [126] per Kirby J

jusme
- e-mail: nwn.webmaster@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com/