Skip to content or view screen version

Plane Stupid Scotland shuts Aberdeen airport

Plane Stupid Scotland | 03.03.2009 07:36 | Climate Chaos

3rd March - Nine young protesters from the climate action group Plane Stupid Scotland have this morning shut down Aberdeen airport by setting up a golf course on the taxiway. They have surrounded themselves with fortified security fencing whilst another group are occupying the roof of the terminal building and have unfurled a banner reading, “Nae Trump Games with Climate Change”.



3rd March - Nine young protesters from the climate action group Plane Stupid Scotland have this morning shut down Aberdeen airport by setting up a golf course on the taxiway. They have surrounded themselves with fortified security fencing whilst another group are occupying the roof of the terminal building and have unfurled a banner reading, “Nae Trump Games with Climate Change”.

The peaceful protest began at 02.15am this morning whilst the runway was closed. Plane Stupid aims to prevent the scheduled reopening of the runway at 5am. The group intends to maintain its blockade for as long as possible to prevent the release of thousands of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere.

Photos available for download and media on our Flickr site: www.flickr.com/photos/planestupid. All photos licensed under Creative Commons.

The activists entered the runway by cutting the fence and scaled the roof climbing ladders. Dressed as Donald Trump, sporting wigs and golfing attire, with crazy golf clubs and balls, the group are ‘putting’ on the tarmac. The banner on the fencing erected by the group reads “Plane Stupid Scotland Golf Open 2009”.

Donald Trump is supporting the expansion of Aberdeen airport where his super-rich friends will arrive to play golf on his controversial golf course. BAA Aberdeen said they welcome Donald Trump's Golf Course. Like Alex Salmond, Trump wants to bulldoze over democratic opposition to environmentally damaging projects like airport expansion. Both Trump and BAA’s plans face fierce local opposition.

One of the activists on the taxiway, Jonny Agnew, 22, from Edinburgh, said:

“We have been failed by the generation of Donald Trump and Alex Salmond. Despite a catalogue of scientific reports warning them that they can’t keep on with aviation growth – even if that hinders their ability to jet in for a weekend of golf – they continue with disregard for all of us, who will end up dealing with the impacts of the climate crisis.”

He added:

“The reality is that our generation’s future is vanishing so that people like Donald Trump and his super-rich friends can jet into Aberdeen for a round of golf. The expansion of this airport just cannot go ahead."

Another, 24 year old Tilly Gifford, a social worker from Glasgow, said:

“Alex Salmond wants to let the Spanish shareholders of BAA, Donald Trump and his super-rich American friends concrete over Scotland and its efforts to stop runaway climate change.”

She added:

“Arctic ice is melting, the sea is already rising and experts warn the world’s rainforests could collapse. Our generation is already starting to feel these impacts as the warming kicks in so it’s obvious that it’s going to need to be us that urgently puts the brakes on expanding unnecessary airports.”

The campaigners chose to close Aberdeen after the Scottish government gave its backing to the expansion of capacity at the airport by 1.5 million passengers by 2015. Aviation is Britain's fastest growing source of emissions, already amounting to at least 13% of the UK's climate emissions.

With plans in the Scottish government’s ‘National Planning Framework’ for growth at Scottish airports including Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen - as well as Heathrow and Stansted - experts from the Tyndall Centre for climate research say aviation policy alone will scupper any chance the UK has of hitting its climate targets.

25 year old Dan Glass, a community worker from Glasgow, said:

“We’re here to say it cannot happen, and our generation won’t let it happen. The scientists tell us we've got seven years to make emissions peak then drop, and if we fail, the people on this runway and their entire generation, and our children, willl live with the consequences. That's why we’re doing this.”

For more information/interviews:

Dan on 07507085963
Katie on 07786381674

For photos – www.flickr.com/photos/planestupid

Plane Stupid Scotland
- Homepage: http://www.planestupid.com

Additions

update at

03.03.2009 13:34

that's it

http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/22280


Comments

Hide the following 18 comments

Nice one!

03.03.2009 11:12

Haha, brilliant :) Well done!

Ms Anne Thropy


Why not pledge not to fly?

03.03.2009 15:13

It would be great if the Plane Stupid protestors pledged not to fly themselves.

That way it would be obvious that this young Tilly Gifford from Glasgow isn't the same young Tilly Gifford from Glasgow who flies out to India every year. That bad Tilly takes loads of Glasgow students with her to teach the evils of climate change to peasant Indian kids who are unlikely ever to fly themselves by er, making pretty mobiles, something I hope this good Tilly Gifford would condemn.

noFlier


To noFlier

03.03.2009 17:00

That would never do. Don't you realise that asking the middle classes to stop flying just isn't on...

They like to make a big deal of telling the rest of us not to fly (which those of us with a sense of responsibility towards the environment already refrain from) whilst jetting off themselves. :/

noFlier also


Update: Arrests made around 8.20am

03.03.2009 18:56

Protesters have been taken into custody after voluntarily releasing themselves from a fortified fence on the tarmac at Aberdeen Airport. Seven protesters from the campaign group Plane Stupid were arrested by Grampian Police at around 8.20am. Two who remained on the roof of the main terminal building were detained later.

A Grampian Police spokesperson said: "All nine people, five of whom are males and four of whom are females, have now been taken into police custody and the incident has been resolved peacefully. Grampian Police are currently working with the BAA to minimise the impact this incident has had."

Flights to and from the airport were temporarily suspended when the protest began at around 3.15am but later resumed at the time of the first arrests. Knock-on disruption to flights continued during the course of the day.

Members of Plane Stupid, who were dressed in the style of property tycoon Donald Trump, hung a banner across the front of the terminal building saying 'Nae Trump games with climate change'. Trump is backing the expansion of the airport following approval being granted for his £1bn golf project in Aberdeenshire by the Scottish Government.


flyer


Criticism and praise

03.03.2009 19:31

The Trump reference is a red-herring designed to get the sympathies of the poor for what is essentially a middle-class campaign. Donald Trump and pals will still be able to fly into Aberdeen airport even if the cost of flights are increased drastically. Previous Plane Stupid spokespersons have refused to rule out flying in future, which while commendably honest also appears hypocritical. The people I know who fly most are Greens, Shared Planet, P&P, Plane Stupid et al - now that may just be the people I know but other have reported the same. If there was one of these nine protestors prepared to pledge not to fly then they should be the spokesperson rather than someone who lists many recent long distance flights, regardless of other considerations.

It reads like a good, safe action though so I applaud that aspect of it. The police guilt-tripping you out of there by saying a sick child was coming in by chopper was something you could have probably refused without risk of bad PR because helicopters don't land on taxiways, they land at helipads. The three Aberdeen helipads are closer to the main road than the taxiway. I assume after 6 hours you were just too cold to continue ( thermal underwear not tights especially up North).

noFlier


Class analysis

03.03.2009 19:37

When Plane Stupid blockaded Stansted airport, spiritual home of the countries two biggest no frills budget airlines, some people criticised the action for unfairly picking on working class people taking their hard earned annual holiday. Those people labelled Plane Stupid as middle class and despite the fact that the action involved 100 people from all over the country and that at least half had never done a Plane Stupid action, it is probably correct that the majority are 'middle class'.

Now, Plane Stupid Scotland activists have targeted Aberdeen airport, used by business men and well to do golfers. And what response follows - yet more stupid insults based around the claim that those involved are middle class!

Pathetic


What is pathetic

03.03.2009 19:46

is that you won't pledge not to fly while disrupting flights. Poor people use Aberdeen airport too you know.
You are prepared to ruin other peoples flights, which is a major investment for most poor people, but not your own flights. I know people from every political party and the ones who fly the most are the Greens. I know people from many different activist campaigns and the ones who fly the most are the P&P, Plane Stupid, Greenpeace activists. Perhaps that is just the people I know giving me a false impression but I've heard others making the same criticism and am prepared to name names if it comes to it. You haven't yet said if this is the same 24 year old Glaswegian Tilly Gifford who states on another website that she flies to India every year. This makes me cynical of claims that this is an environmental issue rather than a class issue.
Why not be explicit and campaign to kill the poor? After all, by killing all the poor people then the rich could fly without environmental worry.

noFlier


@noflier

03.03.2009 20:18

1. Don't address me as if I am somehow representing Plane Stupid, I'm not.

2. I won't pledge not to fly. I do fly and I don't do anti-aviation campaigning.

3. Since I am not involved with Plane Stupid I can't answer your question about Tilly.

4. Killing the poor would include me, I'd rather eliminate the rich.

What is pathetic are attempts to critique Plane Stupid or more generally campaigns against airport expansion on the basis of class.

It's slightly less pathetic to point out the apparent hypocrisy of one person within a campaign and imply that the whole campaign is therefore invalid.

Would you demand that campaigners against a road widening scheme make a pledge to never ride in an ambulance or use coach?

n


According to fact, you are wrong...

03.03.2009 20:32

So, I believe this is a favourite claim of Brendann O'Neill of Spiked/Living Marxism/Revolutionary Community Party fame.This is why this idea that this action on the part of people who despite being as a majority quite well off is somehow disproportionately affecting the poor and working class, is rubbish:

 http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/AviationandSocialExclusionData.pdf

I refer you to table 7 and 8 which clearly show that those from the lowest three socio-economic groups have actually *fallen* as a proportion of passenger numbers over the last 20 years. The huge increase (in real terms) in air travellers is from the middle classes which maintained their share of access. The real class issue here is that the disenfranchised and workers in our society still *do not* have access to air travel (no surprises there), which doesn't seem to be changing very fast (and certainly wont be going anywhere now). Also, the idea that air travel is key to enhancing social mobility seems to me to be quite flawed class-based analysis anyway.

mr numbers


Greenwashing by numbers

03.03.2009 21:48

"Would you demand that campaigners against a road widening scheme make a pledge to never ride in an ambulance or use coach? "

No, but I would expect their spokesperson not to own a car. Similarly, you don't need to be a vegan to argue that eating less meat is good for the planet but I would expect an animal rights spokesperson to be at least vegetarian.

"this is a favourite claim of Brendann O'Neill of Spiked/Living Marxism"
What is a favourite claim? I attended a Living Marxism meeting (lecture) once, bunch of public school tossers who invited audience participation only to stifle real debate by strawman arguments and distraction like your post. Have another read at what I've written and then argue against what I've actually said.

I don't know where you draw the line between middle and upper class, but I'd say the 7% who attend public school are upper class and are responsible for the worst of worlds pollution. So I was being generous calling Plane Stupid a middle-class movement. Not many activists get invites to Downing Street for awards.

noFlier


boring bollocks, repeated comments, heard it all before blah blah

04.03.2009 00:13

noFlier, you made me laugh with your first post, about the good and bad Tilly Gifford.

Partly a fair point, but also unfair because eco-activists don't hold themselves up in general as paragons of virtue, but just people who try their best to strive for a better world for all. It's like the "you use a car, so you can't campaign against roads"/"wear leather..."/"shop.."/etc/blah arguments, which are very easy to make from the sidelines, but total bollocks.

But then in your later comments, you go way up your own arse.

> The people I know who fly most are Greens...
You need to get out more in that case!

> I assume after 6 hours you were just too cold to continue ( thermal underwear not tights especially up
> North).
how supportive of you! And your presumption that they don't know about weather/aren't from 'North'...

> Poor people use Aberdeen airport too you know.
Er, and so? Poorer people still - the other side of the world - are dying because of all our choices, and you're killing the chances of life of future generations. Climate chaos hits the poorest and most marginalised first, so if you're going to have a class analysis, make it a bit more sophisticated please!

> You are prepared to ruin other peoples flights, which is a major investment for most poor people, but
It also - along with other things - kills 150,000 people a year already, directly, according to the World Health Organisation. So which are you saying is more important.

> Why not be explicit and campaign to kill the poor?
Which is in effect what you are advocating by being an armchair criticiser. See the above.

> Greenwashing by numbers
But then, reading your last comment, it becomes clear you are just trolling for no good reason. I'm sure you'll come up with bullshit justifications, but they are just that. Go out into the streets and organise something different, rather than just dissing others for organising. The end.

strawman


Establishment dissent

04.03.2009 01:28

"Partly a fair point, but also unfair because eco-activists don't hold themselves up in general as paragons of virtue, but just people who try their best to strive for a better world for all."

I know that is how you see yourselves, but in reality most of you are jet-setters and your leaders/founders are privileged rich kids with a lot of air miles under your belt. I forgive every public school kid who flys overseas for genuinely, self-honestly altruistic aims, but the upper class campaign against the poor should stop, you have common interests. The poor don't want to destroy the world but it isn't them who is really destroying it.

Some Reds and Greens have suggested dividing the current total of air-miles in a smaller percentage, then dividing those air-miles (carbon credits) equally. Many right wing anarchists suggest the same thing but some green-left anarchists would go futher and suggest carbon credits are not for sale any more than a vote is. If you don't vote, you can't sell your vote. If you don't use your air-miles allocation, you do't get any, travel is something to be saved up for. That is the same as the Greens saying 'If your house isn't insulated and you can't afford to then society will insulate it'. Admirable policy, but flunked through politics.

"Go out into the streets and organise something different, rather than just dissing others for organising."

Without criticism there is no true praise.

noFlier


Aberdeen airport and the working classes

04.03.2009 13:32

Unless you think that bankers and oil company executives are working class then your complaint about Plane Stupid falls flat at Aberdeen. Much like city airport in London, Aberdeen airport is mostly used by rich commuters, many of whom work in the oil industry. The airport hosts hundreds of flights by private jets and helicopters.

Even if it were an airport like Stansted which is mostly used by budget airlines, it is a total myth that those airlines are mostly used by the working classes. The people who can afford to take time off work and jet off for skying holidays in France, they are not this countries road sweepers, cleaners, refuse collectors, catering staff, delivery drivers etc. Most of the customers of budget airlines are the new middle classes, who until recently, were enjoying spending their disposable income on bigger flat screen TVs and multiple short break throughout europe.

Jo


Business class protestors

04.03.2009 14:43

My complaint about Plane Stupid is that their main aim is to raise the cost of flying so that poor people can't, while the protestors and their families still can and do fly without any intention of stopping.

Aberdeen is a richer city than most but to characterise everyone who flies from their as 'bankers and oil company executives' is insulting nonsense. I would bet the richest Aberdonian flyer is poorer than Joss Garman and probably flies less too. Probably more people fly from there than other airports because Aberdeen is so isolated the cost of flying compared to taking the train to a connecting flight is lower.

Besides, if you were wanting to hit the oil companies you would have blocked two out of the three helipads which taxi workers offshore, or even block the Shell office there that you must have passed to get to the airport.

"Most of the customers of budget airlines are the new middle classes, who until recently, were enjoying spending their disposable income on bigger flat screen TVs and multiple short break throughout europe."

You just made my point about snobbery better than I can. I take it none of the protestors families have TVs or have travelled to Europe? I suppose you all just go to the theatre and fly off to India and the Caribbean.

noFlier


@ noFlier

04.03.2009 22:16

""Would you demand that campaigners against a road widening scheme make a pledge to never ride in an ambulance or use coach? "

No, but I would expect their spokesperson not to own a car. Similarly, you don't need to be a vegan to argue that eating less meat is good for the planet but I would expect an animal rights spokesperson to be at least vegetarian.”

As a (vegan) animal rights activist myself I would be surprised if you found many people who act as a spokesperson for animal rights groups who are not vegan.

However, to the point about an anti-road expansion campaign spokesperson, I would disagree an anti-road expansion campaign is not an anti-road campaign, so why shouldn’t a spokesperson own a car? If ‘reclaim the streets’ (whatever happen to them?) on the other hand owned a car it would seem very strange.

ARC


ARC pledge

05.03.2009 13:46

Any anti-roads expansion campaign will have a few activists who don't own or intend to own a car, or are committed enough to get rid of their car, and it is these people who make the best spokespeople. If the anti-roads campaign blocks a proposed new route or targets the equipment needed to build it then no problem, but Aberdeen is the equivalent of blocking existing roads. Airport blocks like this don't directly target airport expansion, they delay or disrupt peoples flights. If your direct action targets strangers about an issue then you should be beyond reproach yourself. I'd prefer not being disrupted about climate change by anyone who eats meat or has a bigger carbon footprint than I do.

Strawman said flying kills 150,000 people a year which is presumably why the Plane Stupid people are motivated to sit in the freezing cold for hours and get arrested, just not commited enough not to fly themselves. Tilly can get to India on by train or bus, but she has one advantage when flying that few people have, she knows her flight isn't going to be delayed or cancelled due a Plane Stupid protest. I wonder what is the strongest pledge to cutting aviation emissions these nine protestors would all sign up to?

noFlier


Quick reply to some comments

05.03.2009 17:29

OK, so I wasn't intending on doing any aviation related activities today, but I thought I'd send a quick reply to some of the comments which seem to be going round in circles a little bit. Obviously I can only speak on my behalf but I know that others from the group who occupied Aberdeen share similar views. First, I'd like to comment on NoFliers "Criticism and Praise" blurb: we had to leave as I believe it would be completely thoughtless and dark to risk a babies life. Personally I think that it was partly a ploy, mainly officials using airport regulation and a human crisis to get at protestors and make us look bad in the media. Despite this, the action had resulted in success and the group decided it was too risky to put a life in danger for the sake of the action even though we were stopping carbon emissions by our presence. It was pretty cold, but I think that that's a pretty weak comment on your part NoFlier.

I can truthfully say that I do not currently fly, and have no intention of doing so in the future. Why you are so insistent on a "pledge" is beyond me, this seems arbitrary and petty. Of course we do not fly, it would be completely illogical to blockade a runway and then zoom off to Spain the next week. Also, I think that you’ll find that the people that fly most are business people on unnecessary short-haul flights. In Scotland, 60% of flights are within the UK and 30% are to London. One of PlaneStupid’s main remits is no short-haul flights and I think that it’s obvious from these figures it’s not “greens and P&Pers” who fly the most.

The comment on the Trump aspect being a red herring is completely unfounded. It is an un-democratic, environmentally damaging and economically draining project which is intrinsically linked to the planned airport expansion. If you want a detailed analysis I can send you some info, or just browse the web, it is pretty obvious.

On the comment of poor people using Aberdeen airport too, this is also completely unfounded, where are you finding your facts? If you look on the BAA Aberdeen website facts section, it shows that the income brackets of users of the airport are as follows: AB: 36%, C1: 49%, C2: 13%, DE: 2%. Hmmm.

Before I go just now, if you want to go naming names, then I would suggest “Trump.” He flies into Aberdeen in a private jet with TRUMP emblazoned on the side.

Johnny Agnew


@Jonathan

06.03.2009 09:08

"It was pretty cold, but I think that that's a pretty weak comment on your part NoFlier. "
No, it was a genuine comment partly informed by your blog saying there was a mix up about tights. Many winter actions have ended due prematurely to the North Sea wind, that wasn't a dig at you.

"Of course we do not fly, it would be completely illogical to blockade a runway and then zoom off to Spain the next week."
There must be two 24 year Mathilda Gifford's from Glasgow interested in Climate Change then, and the other one flies further than Spain.
 http://www.glasgowkinnalcraft.org/html/Profiles.html

"If you look on the BAA Aberdeen website facts section, it shows that the income brackets of users of the airport are as follows: AB: 36%, C1: 49%, C2: 13%, DE: 2%. Hmmm."

It also shows Aberdeen has the lowest AB travellers of any of the published airports so "Aberdeen airport is mostly used by rich commuters" is just not true, it is mostly used by C1C2, and AB use every other airport more.

Glasgow AB: 42%, C1: 38%, C2: 12%, DE: 8%.
Edinburgh AB: 37%, C1: 44%, C2: 9%, DE: 10%
Gatwick AB: 36.8%, C1: 41.3%, C2: 16.5%, DE: 5.4%
Southampton AB: 36.8%, C1: 41.3%, C2: 16.5%, DE: 5.4%
Aberdeen: AB: 36%, C1: 49%, C2: 13%, DE: 2%
* A Higher managerial. administrative and professional
* B Intermediate managerial, administrative and professional
* C1 Supervisory or clerical and junior managerial, administrative and professional
* C2 Skilled manual
* D Semi-skilled and unskilled manual
* E Casual labourers, state pensioners, the unemployed

"He flies into Aberdeen in a private jet with TRUMP emblazoned on the side. "
You never blocked his flight, you only managed to cancel a 'lifeline' flight to the Shetlands. None of your policies will stop Trump or the rich from flying, just poor people. You have just such bad press that you won't have done the Trump campaign any favours. This forum seems typically hostile -  http://taboard.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=91332&st=0

noFlier