Skip to content or view screen version

National Demonstration For Free Education

fil | 25.02.2009 17:19 | Education

Around 1000 students marched from the School of Oriental and African Studies to the Vice Chancellors organization (Universities UK) and then onwards to the head of Universities UK at Kings College.






The protesters called for:

* No raising of the cap on top-up fees; halt and reverse the growth in international students’ fees; abolish all fees in HE and FE – free education for all;
* A living grant for every student over 16 – at least £150 a week; and a living wage for nursing and other students who have to work as part of their course;
* Stop and reverse marketisation in our schools, colleges and universities – tax the rich and corporations to fund education.


This academic year could see the lifting of the £3,000 cap on tuition fees in higher education. Meanwhile, student debt and poverty are already spiralling, students face soaring costs of living, and the market dominates our education system from school to college to university.

After years of underfunding for post-16 education, the Government brought in tuition fees and then top-up fees. Worsening the already existing inequalities in higher education, fees are greatly accelerating the development of a competitive market between universities, with a tier of well-funded and prestigious institutions and another of less prestigious, underfunded ones. Along with the absence of decent student grants, they rule out the possibility of seriously expanding access, force most students who do get to university into debt and push many into casualised, low-paid jobs. Lifting the cap will, of course, make all this worse. Meanwhile most further education students have always paid fees and never had grants.

Top-up fees will be in the headlines this year, but fees are not the only issue. Even those who do not have to pay fees, such as Scottish students and FE students under 19, do not receive a living grant and are also forced into poverty and debt. Nursing, midwifery and other students who have to work as a large part of their course receive a bursary as an on-the-cheap substitute for a living wage.

International students are exploited to subsidise higher education institutions through higher and higher fees, while postgraduate study is limited to a small elite through a more and more restrictive funding system.

Women and disabled students are affected and disadvantaged disproportionately by the growth in student poverty and debt.

As education is commodified and most institutions are run more and more for profit, the wages, conditions and rights of our teachers and other education workers are also coming under attack.

Also note that, as the economic crisis bites, the Government has announced that it plans to cut student numbers and further limit eligibility for grants.

fil
- Homepage: http://www.flickr.com/photos/filkaler/

Additions

quick report from autonomous bloc

25.02.2009 18:26

About 30-40 anarchists and assorted libertarians were present on the autonomous bloc. Most from London, although also a good turnout from Sheffield and Sussex.

Once the march reached High Holborn, the SWP section (who were directly in front of the anarchists at the time) decided to mount a sit-down at the junction of High Holborn and Kingsway (?). About 100-150 people sat down initially, but after literally one or two minutes, the SWP leaders told their contingent to get up and carry on, which they did, leaving about 70 or so protesters who had sat down with them on their own. Stewards harassed those sitting and despite @ calls to remain seated, most were convinced to continue within about 15 minutes by the scaremongering of the stewards. As the cops came in to kettle the remaining 40 or 50, it was decided that if those who started the sit-down, and their lackey stewards, weren't prepared to stay and show solidarity with those still there, there was no point. the protest continued, and reached King's without incident.

FIT were there in force throughout the march, concentrating (surprise surprise) on anyone with a red and black flag or who fraternised with the autonomous bloc. As 20 or so of the autonomous contingent left the final (and utterly tedious, vacuous and pathetic) speeches, a number were stopped and searched and police were clearly reluctant to cite under which law they were being searched. It was clearly retribution for refusing to obey the SWP and their lackey volunteer bureaucrats.

This demo reminded us of three key principles: never trust the SWP, never trust the cops, and never trust stewards (no matter how friendly and understanding they may sound).

All in all, same old same old.

lolwob


Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Where were you?

25.02.2009 18:23

Where was the red & black bloc? All in all a poor turnout of only a few hundred!! Apathy?

Inquisitir


poor turnout

25.02.2009 19:03

Considering the recent rise in student politics focusing around the occupations in support of the people of Palestine the way this demonstration has been organised and pulled off reflects many of the problems existing in campus politics.

As a non-alligned anarchist student I have followed and participated in the Education is Not for Sale campaign over the last two years. Whilst some universities and campus groups responded well to the call-out for an anti-capitalist/anti-marketization campaign, ENS unfortunately fell into the quagmire that is the bickering of the authoritarian left amongst themselves. The Socialist Workers Party, Alliance for Workers Liberty, Socialist students... the list goes on. The factionalism and back room agendas of the left has left student politics muted by its own infighting.

The occupations showed the power of the students when infighting was put aside and solidarity with one another was shown as the strength that it is. However, since the end of the occupation at our university I have noticed a return to the name calling and accusation slinging that makes the various socialist groups look ever more unappealing from the perspective of an outsider. I believe it is this that is the problem with student politics, not political apathy.

I chose not to attend the free education demo today, despite the well written call-out for an autonomous bloc (though the use of the word libertarian in the call-out was conceptually dubious) due to not wanting to be caught up in the problems that are engrossing and absorbing the authoritarian left; infighting/petty name calling etc. But also because of the way that these socialist groups have hijacked this campaign for free education. I think todays report shows how the SWP should not be allowed to maintain their facade of 'control' over student politics as it is in fact hampering decent action not facilitating it.

I do not wish to criticise the aims of those involved in todays demonstration, but simply to issue a warning to my fellow students; DO NOT GET CAUGHT IN THE TRAP OF POLITICAL VANGUARDISM.

As people we are the agents of change and our actions should reflect this.

Instead of those political parties with fingers in every pie, let us close our fingers and make a fist!

Maximum solidarity to every dreamer
love&rage

Nonalligned


Turnout and Stewards

25.02.2009 23:52

As someone who has helped organise the demo, I don't think that it was as negative as posted. (although I would say that wouldn't I!)

The turn out with just under 1000 was good for a demo that was actively discouraged by the NUS and local Unions. Activists had come together and worked to get the thing together. We planned the demo with 3 open planning meetings working with a range of decision making methods including majoritarian and consensus at different meetings.

There will always be back room bickering and disagreements but generally the planning process was amicable and I was really pleased that independents, SWSS, AEIP, AWL, ENS, Socialist Students, Revolution and many people from the Anarchist Federation came together and agreed to work together.

I would agree that the ending was disappointing - but it was for people to take this in to their own hands. The demo had always been about ending so that people to with affinity groups and other groups use a multiplicity of tatcitcs. It was disappointing not because SWP did their thing and had some speeches at the end or that ENS had a fridge meeting at the end but because so many people didn't take on their own actions - which could of happened irrelevant of the SWP.

The sit down was good that students tried (although at one point holding up an ambulance- which wasn't cool). I personally felt that most of the stewards were fine (again I would say that) with ENS, SWP and Socialist Students all providing 10 stewards each. During the sit down a number of swards joined the sit down, others tried to make sure that the demo didn't split.

The police then said that they were going to start a kettle and arrest people - I cant speak for other stewards, but I told people the information and that they should make of it what they wanted. Myself with other swards didnt encorage people to move off. The SWP contingent at the front then moved off and others followed. There were then other opportunity for sit downs which no one initiated (again SWP were never going to do that so what's the big surprise) - in fact it was more surprising that they even joined the sit down at all.

All in all, I would say that the demo was a stepping stone, but with NUS elections coming up maybe it will foster some togetherness with the Free Education lobby and also show that people do and can work together.

an ENS supporter.

Lloyd Russell-Moyle
- Homepage: http://russell-moyle.co.uk


the Anarchist Federation helped organise this?!

26.02.2009 15:31

"There will always be back room bickering and disagreements but generally the planning process was amicable and I was really pleased that independents, SWSS, AEIP, AWL, ENS, Socialist Students, Revolution and many people from the Anarchist Federation came together and agreed to work together."

are you serious? In what capacity did they do that? In what sense did these groups work together? That doesn't sound like the AF at all.

shocked


Silliness

27.02.2009 17:09

Where was the autonomous bloc, you ask? That would be the group of people with about 10 red and black flags between them, a wobbly banner, covered faces, a banner with a circle a on, etc... Was that not obvious enough?

Nonalligned complains about sectarianism then has a dig at the SWP? Good logic there. Also, if you're fed up of sectarianism, don't just avoid any left-wing action, try to actively put an end to it. I know that the activist community in my uni has made positive steps away from sectarianism and infighting, and there is a greater degree of cooperation and solidarity than before. Try actually talking to people about it, reasoning with people, and leading by example by not bitching so much about parties 'hijacking' things, etc. Incidentally that claim is a bit silly as I was on the march and the SWP had a much weaker presence than I expected them to. The autonomous bloc was about as big as the SWP bloc, for christ's sake!

I don't think anyone's trying to claim that AFED people organised the demo, although I could be wrong; I think the sentence was meant to be interpreted as saying that AFED members were present and marched alongside socialist party members, etc, without too much bitching or bickering - this is broadly true with the notable exception of the sit-down.

Personally I think the above account of the sit-down is rather one-sided and overzealous. It neglects to mention, for instance, the fact that several anarchists didn't take part, and that several stewards, as well as the so-called 'bureaucrats' (e.g. the ENS secretary) did take part. In fact, one of the stewards was an anarchist, and was very reasonable about not telling other people what to do:
"I'm not telling you to stand up, just letting you know that the police have said they will arrest people. That's your own choice to make, I'm just letting people know what the police have said."
He was met with cries of "TRAITOR!" and "Stand up if you're a bureaucrat" - great show of solidarity, guys...
I think some people just felt the need to carry out 'direct action' for the sake of it, without considering what the actual aim of their action was, or what its consequences for the people in the buses/ambulance/etc were. Their position wasn't helped by their intense desire to polarise the issue and insult people who thought that they were making a tactical miscalculation (they shouted "C*NTS" at people who were standing).

rogue