Nottingham University Gaza solidarity occupation violently evicted : pix 2
Tash [alan lodge] | 03.02.2009 12:12 | University Occupations for Gaza | Free Spaces | Palestine | Social Struggles
Around 10 security staff used force to remove the occupants into the snow outside. Students were forced to wait in the cold and only alowed in one by one to pick up their belongings. They were forced to give ID in order to be allowed entry.
The occupation of B62 in the Law and Social Science Building at the University of Notttingham was today violently evicted by university security. The occupation which has been taking place since Wednesday is in solidarity with the people of Gaza and is one of a wave of university occupations which have taken place across the UK following the recent Israeli assault against Gaza. Although the occupiers have been clear throughout that they had no intention of disrupting other students' education, the university had refused to follow the lead of Kings College in London and negotiate with the occupying students.
At approximately six o'clock, Steven Dudderidge, director of student operations and support, Professor David Reilly and Head of Security, Gary Stevens entered B62 and restated their previous statement, made on Friday evening, which called for an end to the occupation and claimed that university authorities would "convene a meeting with the full range of relevant campus societies to promote dialogue around the issue of the Middle East and the recent conflict in Gaza," but only once the occupation ended. Dudderidge then told students that if they did not leave within two minutes security would enter and remove those in the room. No prior warning was given that this ejection would occur. Dudderidge refused to answer any questions or engage with those involved in the occupation
People decided to peacefully sit at the far end of the lecture theatre where most of their belongings were. Around 10 campus security then entered from a different door and dragged people out. Many were roughly assaulted and forced into stress positions causing them to scream out. Some were dropped on the concrete paving slabs outside. While this was happening other security staff protecting the windows outside stood and laughed. Not only was the violence illegal it was also unnecessary as no one was trying to actively resist.
People started to gather outside the car park entrance to the building including many supporters who had responded to emergency calls and texts. The police also arrived although they refused to act on the allegations of assault preferring to firmly enforce the university's will. They refused to facilitate those who had been assaulted in identifying the security staff who had assaulted them claiming that they didn't have the resources to deal with it! The security in question tried to lurk out of the way of the cameras outside. There was then a long period during which it is suspected that the occupants belongings were searched for personally identifying documents, etc. The security staff closed all of the curtains to ensure that no one could see what they were up to. When people did eventually get their belongings back, pockets were open and bags had been rifled through.
The university authorities had decided that people were only to be allowed to go back to pick up their belongings one or two at a time and only after they had produced ID. Their details were being recorded by university security. One person who had been allowed in described how he was generally intimidated by the security and the senior police officer present who had previously been seen having a cordial chat with ex-policeman and Head of University Security, Gary Stevens, through the glass doors. Those who could not produce ID were told that they were not allowed to claim their belongings. What will happen to those people's belongings is unclear although a number of cleaning staff were seen entering the lecture theatre with black bin liners. In spite of the freezing weather (snow had started falling) and a possible solution being proposed, that the belongings be brought outside and the police witness who was taking what, people were made to wait for the unnecessarily lengthy and vindictive process that security had deemed necessary. The police were deferent to university security at all times, never challenging this process.
In spite of (or perhaps because of) this repression the sizeable crowd who had gathered in support of the occupation were defiant and angry. Good spirits were maintained by supporters bringing food and blankets for those who were left without coats in the heavy snow. The police claimed that they did not have the resources to deal with allegations of assault against university security.
University authiorities had a confrontational attitude towards the occupation from its inception. They refused to negotiate, cancelled lectures in the room, prevented LibDem Peer Baroness Tonge from entering the building to show her support and even attempted to turn off power to the room, but it was quickly restored. When the BBC turned up in order to report on the occupation they were prevented from entering the campus by university authorities.
Concerned readers are encourage to email their anger at the protesters treatment to Vice Chancellor:
david.greenaway@nottingham.ac.uk, Director of Student Operations: stephen.dudderidge@nottingham.ac.uk or Pro Vice Chancellor of the student experience: david.reilly@nottingham.ac.uk Nottingham University in Solidarity with Gaza
http://occupationnottingham.wordpress.com Free Gaza Campaign
http://www.freegaza.com UK Feature: Yet again Israel massacres Gazan civilians
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/12/416339.html UK Feature: Gaza: Stop The Genocide
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/417271.html UK Feature: National Free Gaza demo 10.01.2009
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/417698.html Nottingham Gaza Emergency Protest
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/12/416449.html http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/12/416470.html Gaza Public Meeting at Bobbers Mill Community Centre
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/418048.html Nottingham Responds to Gaza Massacre [Feature]
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2009/01/418376.html Nottingham Gaza Protest 'candle-lit' Vigil
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419206.html http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419227.html Nottingham Gaza Protest March Through Nottingham to Market Sq
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419251.html http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/419272.html Nottingham University Students Occupation in Solidarity with Gaza
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/02/420886.html http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/02/420907.html ____________________________________________
ALAN LODGE
Photographer - Media: One Eye on the Road. Nottingham. UK
Email:
tash@indymedia.org Member of the National Union of Journalists [No: 014345]
____________________________________________
"It is not enough to curse the darkness.
It is also necessary to light a lamp!!"
___________________________________________
Tash [alan lodge]
e-mail:
tash@indymedia.org
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
out of curiosity
03.02.2009 14:10
out of curiosity
Try reading the post
03.02.2009 17:01
sam
Lie with dogs, get up with fleas....
04.02.2009 11:51
Nottingham university management have got so close to China they have even learned how to implement Chinese Government style policy towards dissent.
Wenqi
curiosity: Cameras were physically removed from a few of the protesters
05.02.2009 11:45
Cameras were physically removed from the grasp of a few of the protesters and there is currently no footage or photos of the removal. The BBC were reportedly denied permission to access campus in a blatant act of censorship by the University. As they were being removed a student began to inform the police of events. When they arrived the police kept the protesters outside the north entrance of the Law and Social Sciences building, however they did not address any student claims of assault. The head of university security addressed the protesters and said they would be allowed in one at a time to retrieve their jackets and other items of property, but only if they showed their student ID.. Another security person said that no personal details would be taken (footage available) however once inside it was discovered that this was not the case. Anyone wishing to retrieve their property had to have their names and student numbers recorded. All of this took close to three hours, the students were forced to endure sub-zero temperatures and snowfall. Some simply decided to abandon their property from fear of punishment or due to weather conditions. Especially after the peaceful nature of their protest many of the students are consulting legal advice following the use of, what they considered, excessive force that caused some physical injuries.
Once again, the University of Nottingham distinguishes itself by acting in the most repressive and disgraceful manner against what was a very peaceful, very civil expression of dissent. This is yet another example of the University Authorities trying to enforce a homogeneous culture of apathy and consent across the student body. Students who engage with the realities of this world are seen as a threat to the University's PR image of enforced servility parading as stability.
The protest has not disrupted any lectures. The room was available for lectures at all times and many lecturers and students verified the fact themselves. The University is to blame for any disruption as they are the ones who cancelled the lectures without consulting the students or the lecturers. As seen in previous episodes such as the AUT graylisting and the Freedom of Speech protests, it is obvious the views and opinions of staff and students mean nothing to the authorities of this institution.
However, perhaps we should not be surprised. The senior management at Nottingham University have a proud history of repressing free speech, curtailing academic freedom and ignoring/disregarding their own staff and students:
Student of stuff