Skip to content or view screen version

High Court Australia pervert justice, cause injury leading to deaths

jusme | 02.02.2009 21:24 | Analysis | Anti-racism | Education

How High Court Australia conspire to pervert justice, and to cause injury leading to deaths

Dear Australian Parliament and the Australian Federal Police,

I give notice of a Judicial and Constitutional crisis in the Australian legal system.

By giving me authority to join to my action, ALL actions against Mr John Wilson are now suspended until the High Court Australia determines all Questions of Law, and Notices of a constitutional matter.

A judicial and constitutional crisis means a void in jurisdiction of all legal proceedings in the Australian legal system.

pham

 http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com/

 http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=9571

Dear Members of Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia,
Australian Federal Police,

The Hon Kevin Rudd MP
Title: Prime Minister.

The Hon Julia Gillard MP
Title: Deputy Prime Minister; Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations; Minister for Education; Minister for Social Inclusion.

Committee Secretary
Joint Standing Committee on Treaties
Department of House of Representatives

The Hon Robert McClelland MP
Title: Attorney-General.

Peter Hallahan
Committee Secretary
Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee
Department of the Senate

Committee Secretary
House of Representatives Standing Committee on
Legal and Constitutional Affairs

The Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP
Title: Leader of the Opposition.

Senator the Hon John Hogg
Senator for Queensland
Position: President of the Senate

John Carter
Committee Secretary
Senate Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Committee
Department of the Senate
Committee Secretary
Standing Committee on Employment and Workplace Relations
House of Representatives

Australian Federal Police
Michael Joseph Keelty, APM

RE: Constitutional and Judicial crisis; conspiracy to pervert justice and conspiracy to cause injury

We give Notice of constitutional and judicial crisis, conspiracy to pervert justice by fabricating documents and evidence, and conspiracy to cause injury by the Australia Judiciary and Commonwealth officials, and others.

Advice us what we should do, what information you need and anything else of relevance to help bring legitimacy back to the Australian parliament and judiciary.

In June of 2008, grandmother Teresa Thi Tran of Melbourne VIC, died in pain because the Alfred Hospital VIC, and Dr Stuart K Roberts Director of gastroenterology, withdrew her treatment and failed to put her on palliative care, and most importantly, failed to notify her family of her prognosis or the need for palliative care.

We tried to apply to the High Court and the Supreme Court of Victoria on Questions of Law regarding this sort of Human Rights violations and racial discrimination. Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ refused to hear Questions of Law regarding access to the law and the constitution, rules of law and rules of evidence. Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ allowed this grandmother to die in pain and without dignity in her final hours. Hayne, Gummov and Crennan also allowed and authorised through their decisions and non-decisions

a. the racist police abuse and deaths of TJ Hickey and Mulrunji (known as Cameron Doomadgee),

b. the abuse of Vivian Solon and Cornelia Rau,

c. and the incarceration of Lex Wotton and Aborigines for fighting for their home and family;

d. how many others is John von Doussa, the president of HREOC covering up?

The case of Teresa Tran is also the direct result of the Howard government and the Senate and House committees’ on Legal and Constitutional Matters failure to act against the misconduct of John von Doussa. Since 2000, the President of HREOC, John von Doussa, refused to investigate human rights violations and racial discriminations against the Commonwealth and others, and then refused to terminate the complaints so that they can be heard in the Federal Court. von Doussa also refused to report to Parliament any human rights complaints, as required under HREOA (Cth) 1986 section 46PO and other subsections.

John von Doussa refused to investigate the actions of
a. Qld Health, Gregory Seymour, Suzette Porter, PM Bartold, Rod Marshall, Laurie walsh;

in violating public safety, as Roberts is doing now, whilst rorting the public purse and taxpayers money for their continued employment. Apparently, workplace safeties are only for some persons, we sought to question the High Court Australia who those persons may be. According to Hayne, Gummov and Crennan, Questions of law can’t be heard to protect the public either.

Why are Hayne, Gummov, and Crennan JJ fighting so hard to prevent our Notices of a Constitutional Matter being heard in the High Court? Heerey, North, Grey, French JJ and others, also believe that Notices of a Constitutional Matter and Questions of Law can’t be heard in the Australian Courts either. We know this to be untrue so, the question is who can and who can’t seek legal redress and Questions of law answered in the Australian Courts.

What are these Judges fighting so hard to cover up? Unconstitutional and illegal conducts of HREOC President John von Doussa and Senior Member John Handley of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Attached is the submission to AAT V1865/2007, with the AAT seal on every page, since John Handley has a bad habit of fabricating evidence and document. You will note that John Handley refused to seal and serve Summons on relevant witnesses, preferring to abuse the rule of evidence by relying to hearsay evidence and fabricated evidence from counsel Tim de Uray, and Paul Mentor of Sparke Helmore. All of the affidavits have been filed in the Federal Court and the High Court, and we can provide them on request since they are many.

Conspiracy to cause injury extends to the abusive police beating up of Mulrunji, abusive police and sheriffs beating up on John Wilson and his friends, abusive police and racist policies of John Howard and now the Rudd government in the NT intervention in beating up Lex Wotton, and Darren Bloomfield, deaths of TJ Hickey and Mulrunji (known as Cameron Doomadgee). All authorised and sanctioned by the High Court Australia.

All these are Questions of Law that must be answered by the FULL BENCH of the High Court Australia: whether rules of law and the rules of evidence exists in the Australian legal system, whether access to the law and constitution is confined to the few, whether access to Australian Laws and legal process and equality before the law confined to the few.

We will file Summons on the Governor General and the Attorneys General for Notices of a Constitutional Matters, and we would hope they will come and validate the legitimacy of the High Court and the rule of law in Australia, and not let Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ continue to the run the cases for the Commonwealth of Australia and thereby disregarding the separation of the Executive Branch of government from the Judiciary.
Whether the Judges have immunity is not my problem; it would seem they are abusing their immunity and any discretionary powers.

Hayne J in M142/2007 PHAM vs Commonwealth, not only ran the case for the commonwealth but he also refused to answer Questions of Law and modified our application without our authorisation. Hayne’s intention was to change our Notices of a Constitutional Matter, to an appeal of the decision of the Federal court so that we couldn’t appeal anything further, depriving us of appeals avenue. Hayne thereby illegally deprived us of our filing fees like a common thief.

Gummov and Crennan JJ tried to sidestep the legal process by refusing filing of Questions of Law and Notices of a Constitution Matters, based on discretionary powers they don’t have. We would like to know who can have Questions of Law answered by the High Court?

The Judges may or may not have immunity from prosecution; however, we don’t believe John Handley, Tim de Uray and Paul Mentor have any immunity for conspiring to pervert justice by fabricating documents and evidence. We expect the Federal Police to investigate thoroughly, seeking as much information from us as needed.

We also expect the Federal Police to investigate the conduct of Rosemary Musolino, Denise Weybury (High Court) and Chris Weymouth (counter staff), and Joe Saltalamacchia (Prothonotary, Supreme Court Victoria) in refusing to seal my Applications in the High Court and the Supreme Court Victoria without legal cause or instruments. Chris Weymouth threatened us physically, and Rosemary Musolino refused to witness our affidavits, such that we had to call the security staff and Joe Logiudice at the High Court, to come assist us in filing our documents.

All these individuals will be named in future proceedings in the High Court, and we would expect all our filings to be carried through in the proper manner. We realise Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ have destroyed our Australian citizenship without cause or legal reasons, just as they have done against John Wilson, Lex Wotton, Cornelia Rau, Vivien Solon, TJ Hickey and Mulrunji (known as Cameron Doomadgee) and the Aborigines, and many others. We seek to determine the legality of such illegal acts from Hayne, Gummov and Crennan.

These individuals were authorised by Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ to prevent my mother from receiving the palliative and/or proper care, when our Writs and Applications were refused in the Supreme Court Victoria and the High Court Australia. My mother died in pain and without dignity because we couldn't have legal redress against Rogers and the Alfred Hospital in time to force them to conduct care with due diligence.

We have authorisation from John Wilson, Darren Bloomfield, and others to come, to become party, and we expect our application to be filed as a matter of course in order to determine the definition of Australian Citizenship. No further action against John Wilson can commence until we have our Questions of Law answered by the FULL High Court, as per his right as a citizen of Australia, given that Hayne, Gummov and Crennan have created a judicial crisis and legal void in legitimacy of the jurisdiction of the Australian judiciary.

Advice us what we should do, these government officials will not have immunity against prosecution; either the Australian Federal Police can investigate them with due diligence, we can give instructions for citizen arrests on all of them for conspiracy to pervert justice and conspiracy to cause injury.

Advise us what we should do.

We note that the senate and house committees have not acted on our notices previously. We seek formally that this also form the basis of the Petition to the relevant Australian Parliament committees regarding judicial corruption, conspiracy to pervert justice by fabricating documents and evidence, contrary to rules of evidence and rules of law. We wonder if the Australian Parliament is made illegitimate, by the committees’ non-action. Public health and safety against Qld Health, Gregory Seymour, Suzette Porter, PM Bartold, Rod Marshall, Laurie Walsh, as well as Dr Stuart K Roberts Director of gastroenterology Alfred Health must be investigated, and our writs be filed as part of our redress through the legal system. These individuals continue to rort the health system and our tax burden without scrutiny.

We will attach these documents for perusal. Since we intend to send to many members, we cannot attach many.

1. Transcript of M142/2007 PHAM vs the Commonwealth;

2. V1865/2007 PHAM vs DWER;

3. Documents fabricated by Tim de Uray and Paul Mentor of Sparke Helmore;

4. Affidavit against Byrne J, and Joe Saltalamacchia but was refused without cause by Weybury;

We were expecting full arguments in the Courts, as the norm in any first world legal system. As you can see, Tim de Uray fabricated the documents, and we tried to summons the Secretary, Department of Workplace Relations, in order to confirm the authenticity. Senior Member John Handley refused to issues or seal those summons, his intention was to disregard rules of evidence and rules of law, and tailor made his decision based on fabricated evidence and documents that we could not verify at the witness stand. By refusing our Questions of law, Hayne, Gummov and Crennan JJ authorised Handley, de Uray and Mentor to continue to pervert justice in total disregard for rules of law and evidence, by fabricating documents. We watched in horror as North J of the Federal Court, removed a case to the lower courts when the defendants could hardly speak English. That’s the definition of institutionalised discrimination.

The Commonwealth owes us our HECS and tuition fees, compensation for loss of income, court costs, our Australian citizenship as well as John Wilson’s, TJ Hickey’s and Mulrunji’s, Lex Wotton’s, and many others. Commonwealth owes us for our taxes paid since 1996 in employment of John von Doussa, and the Judges and government officials. The Commonwealth owes Teresa Tran resting peace, and for her grandchild not to be abused and deprived of what rightfully belongs to him.

Sincerely,

FURTHER DOCUMENTS

PHAM

Monday, 2 February 2009

 http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/exposing-judiciary-corruption-australian-legal-system-online-docs

Judicial Corruption, pervert justice, institutionalised racism

Perverting rules of law and evidence by Administrative Appeals Tribunal Senior Member John Handley

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960326/V20071865AAT27102008web2up

Judicial Corruption, pervert justice, institutionalised racism

How the High Court Australia judge Hayne J conspiring to pervert justice, by acting for the defendant and modifying the application without authorisation from the applicant, and then illegally depriving the applicant of the filing fees. Covering up for Senior Member John Handley.

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960139/Highcourthayne2up

Judicial Corruption, pervert justice, institutionalised racism

How the High Court Australia judge Crennan and Gummov JJ conspiring to pervert justice, by covering up for Hayne J. abusing any discretionary powers in rule.

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960293/High-CourtcrenNAN20022008-2Web-2up

Judicial Corruption, pervert justice, institutionalised racism

How Victorian Judge Byrne and prothonotary Joe saltalamacchia conspire to pervert justice in refusing to seal writs under common law in the state of victoria.

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10960264/Byrneweb-2up

what you see is all the way and down the Australian Judiciary is a bunch of corrupt judges and lawyers and judicial officers conspiring to pervert justice, dispensing with rules of law and rules of evidence.

jusme
- e-mail: nwn.webmaster@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com

Comments

Hide the following comment

http://images.theage.com.au/2009/02/02/367314/wr_420_michaelkirby-420x0.jpg

03.02.2009 18:57

 http://images.theage.com.au/2009/02/02/367314/wr_420_michaelkirby-420x0.jpg

 http://images.theage.com.au/2009/02/02/367314/wr_420_michaelkirby-420x0.jpg

JUSTICE Michael Kirby has retired from the High Court in a blaze of controversy, accusing fellow judges of exercising racial bias against Aborigines in the Northern Territory intervention case.

Justice Kirby's attack drew an extraordinary rebuke from Chief Justice Robert French, who attacked the departing judge for his "gratuitous" suggestion that the bench had made a ruling based on the "Aboriginality" of those involved in the case.

And not for the first time, Justice Kirby was the sole dissenter in a 6-1 decision. In this case a majority of judges ruled against Aborigines who challenged the constitutionality of a key aspect of the former Howard government's 2007 intervention.

About 60 protesters stormed the lobby of the High Court building in Canberra after the decision, several clashing with police trying to push them out of the building. One man was arrested.

The row came on the same day as a complaint was lodged with the United Nations against the NT intervention, claiming it was racist and responsible for "an escalation in racist incidents".

In yesterday's High Court ruling, the majority of judges found that an amendment to the Aboriginal Land Rights Act allowing the Commonwealth to take five-year leases over land, communities and town camps was valid. They found, however, that there were grounds for land councils to ask for "just terms" compensation.

The case was launched by senior members of the Dhukurrdji clan, challenging the validity of the lease over the Maningrida land in Arnhem Land.

Justice Kirby sparked the ire of Chief Justice French by suggesting that the Aboriginality of the applicants influenced their decision. "If any other Australians, selected by reference to their race, suffered the imposition on their pre-existing property interests of non-consensual five-year statutory leases … it is difficult to believe that a challenge to such a law would fail as legally unarguable on the ground that no 'property' had been 'acquired'," he said.

"The Aboriginal parties are entitled to have their trial and day in court. We should not slam the doors of the courts in their face. This is a case in which a transparent, public trial of the proceedings has its own justification."

Chief Justice French's rebuke was blistering, accusing his former colleague of insinuating discrimination by the rest of the bench. "The conclusion at which I have arrived does not depend upon any opinion about the merits of the policy behind the challenged legislation.

"Nor, contrary to the gratuitous suggestion in the judgement of Kirby J, is the outcome of this case based on an approach less favourable to the plaintiffs because of their Aboriginality," he said.

Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin said later the Government had supported "just terms" compensation and would immediately negotiate with payments to landowners.

Ms Macklin said that the Government would also examine reducing the boundaries of the current five-year leases.

Meanwhile, a formal complaint has been lodged with the UN against the intervention, saying the Commonwealth is in "flagrant breach" of its obligations under the International Convention on the Elimination of Racism, that the intervention is illegal under international law and violates human rights.

It claims the intervention has undermined Aboriginal communities to the extent that they have been left in "collective existential despair".

The complaint urges the UN to direct Australia to suspend the intervention while it enters discussions with the NT Aborigines to ensure compliance with the convention.

It points out that Australia suspended its Racial Discrimination Act to allow the intervention to be implemented.

The complaint was sent last Wednesday to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in Geneva. It was presented on behalf of the Prescribed Area People's Alliance, a range of communities affected by the intervention, by a legal team led by former Federal Court judge Ron Merkel, QC, and including human rights lawyer George Newhouse.

Twenty people from various Aboriginal communities across the Northern Territory signed the complaint.

Mr Newhouse said the complaint was the only avenue of redress left to the communities after yesterday's refusal by the High Court to rule the intervention illegal.

The UN committee's rulings were not legally binding but carried a moral force, he said.

 http://www.theage.com.au/national/kirbys-last-dissent-my-fellow-judges-racially-biased-20090202-7vr7.html?page=-1

Looks like Merkel and Newhouse are just copying us.

Too little too late now Justice Kirby
Perhaps we could ahve come to you earlier

jusme
mail e-mail: nwn.webmaster@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com