Skip to content or view screen version

Heathrow Terminal One Climate Rush Picnic a success!

Nessuno | 13.01.2009 02:46 | Climate Camp 2008 | Climate Chaos | World

I arrived at Heathrow terminal one with alot of trepidation and caution. Not knowing what to expect, I dressed in a suit and tie to avoid attracting interest. It did not work.

Check in
Check in


I entered the terminal and when up to domestic departures to see what was happening. I found a place to sit and enjoy a coffee whilst waiting. Being near the place where alot of BAA security guards were gathering, I overheard them trying to guess who was a protester and who was a passenger...it was very funny knowing I sat yards away and they had did not realise....

The airport was in a state of some considerable alert. It seems that Climate Rush and a devilishly criminal plan to have a militant picnic (by mostly women) in departures had BAA on the run.

The cops were another matter. FIT crews were on the upper gangways and over 100 police occupied the departures lounge when i arrived about an hour before. Even more arrived as I sipped my coffee and read the Guardian.

After twenty minutes, two cops sauntered over to me and ask whether they could search me. I asked why. they said there is a protest planned and they were looking for climate chaos extremists. I said I was waiting for a friend. After finding nothing and believing my story, they let me go. I decided to move to Cafe Rouge where everybody was gathering...safety in numbers I thought. soon as I got up there, there was another 30 cops watching absolutely everyone...

As the minutes counted down, I moved with undercurrents down into the departure check in area and was joined by about 50 or 60 people who started to lay out a banner and a well stocked organic and home cooked picnic. Ten minutes later, the bulk of protesters arrived and the departures check in filled up fast. Real passengers moved aside and the police moved in to encircle the picnic. By this stage close to 500 climate rush protesters were spreading themselves out in a ever widening circle. The strings Quartet began playing and a few people started playing with a big ball which looked like the planet.

The BAA corporate media descended and so did lots of TV camera's hoping for an interview. at one such so many interviews were being given, it became difficult to move around. Speaking with some of the organizers, they claimed an enormous success in suspending the operation of terminal 1. It certainly looked like a success to me.

A while later and after most of the food had been eaten (flushed down with a little wine), everyone rose to their feet and started chanting. After Stanstead, the government, media and police were saying that everyone was an extremist and possibly eco-terrorists. So the protesters, mostly women (some in the 50 and 60's) started chanting " do we look like terrorists?" and 'down with BAA'

After one hour, the cops were closing the circle fearing a blockade or a long-term occupation. I feared we were all going to be hemmed in and arrested so I decided to retreat with my video camera intact and get back home.

Worried about what I had walked away from, I rang a friend who said that everything was alright. the demo had finished 15 minutes after I left and there had been no arrests. In fact the cops relaxed and got quite bored as climate-rush activists offered them food!

Nessuno

Additions

Photos

13.01.2009 12:57

more arrive
more arrive

The chanting begins
The chanting begins

in fine form!
in fine form!

the Climate change Doctor Who
the Climate change Doctor Who

final pic...
final pic...

Photos

Nessuno


Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

What do terrorists look like?

13.01.2009 11:32

Chanting "do we look like terrorists?" seems about as stupid as claiming the suffragettes were peaceful.

prankhurst


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Yeh genuis thats right we are even more peaceful than suffragettes&still you

13.01.2009 13:19

try to accuse of being terrorists, thanks for the enlightened comment anyway though , please continue facts are good.
Its not us you should worry about, its if we dont get serious change soon that you should worry about, many in the Pentagon now register climate change as a much larger threat than the terrorist groups the CIA trained up like Al Queada.
We should have had safe hydrogen fuel cells & electric engines more than 50yrs ago, why dont you investigate the owner of Ryan air, Henry Kissinger or David Rockefeller?

Nice action, wish I could have been there, recovering from riot police kettling over a thousand people with women & children outside the embassy, then batton charging us. Does the UK really mean it with the UN ceasefire resolution, the facts on the ground seem to say the opposite, Israel destabilises the region, useful pawns for cheap petroluem.
3,000 tonnes of arms going to Israel know check previous IMC postings, to fuel war. Has anyone done a carbon footprint of all the wars done connected to the oil industry?, must be higher than anything else with all connected refugee situ's etc.
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/418101.html?c=on#c212271
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/418075.html

"the Pentagon is the single largest consumer of oil in the world. If the Pentagon was a country, it would be the 36th biggest consumer of oil. The US military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day, but this total only includes "vehicle transport and facility maintenance". What about the 130,000 US contractors in Iraq rebuilding the ruined infrastructure?"
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/sep/27/ethicalliving.carbonfootprints?gusrc=rss&feed=environment

Universal Confederalist


Yeh genuis thats right we are even more peaceful than suffragettes&still you

13.01.2009 13:26

try to accuse of being terrorists, thanks for the enlightened comment anyway though , please continue facts are good.
Its not us you should worry about, its if we dont get serious change soon that you should worry about, many in the Pentagon now register climate change as a much larger threat than the terrorist groups the CIA trained up like Al Queada.
We should have had safe hydrogen fuel cells & electric engines more than 50yrs ago, why dont you investigate the owner of Ryan air, Henry Kissinger or David Rockefeller?

Nice action, wish I could have been there, recovering from riot police kettling over a thousand people with women & children outside the embassy, then batton charging us. Does the UK really mean it with the UN ceasefire resolution, the facts on the ground seem to say the opposite, Israel destabilises the region, useful pawns for cheap petroluem.
3,000 tonnes of arms going to Israel know check previous IMC postings, to fuel war. Has anyone done a carbon footprint of all the wars done connected to the oil industry?, must be higher than anything else with all connected refugee situ's etc.
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/418101.html?c=on#c212271
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/418075.html

"the Pentagon is the single largest consumer of oil in the world. If the Pentagon was a country, it would be the 36th biggest consumer of oil. The US military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day, but this total only includes "vehicle transport and facility maintenance". What about the 130,000 US contractors in Iraq rebuilding the ruined infrastructure?"
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/sep/27/ethicalliving.carbonfootprints?gusrc=rss&feed=environment

Universal Confederalist


@Universal Confederalist

13.01.2009 16:30

"still you try to accuse of being terrorists"

No, the suggestion is that the people saying that are racists, it certainly sounds like a racist chant.

christabella


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments